AKCES-GEC is a grammar error correction corpus for Czech generated from a subset of AKCES. It contains train, dev and test files annotated in M2 format.
Note that in comparison to CZESL-GEC dataset, this dataset contains separated edits together with their type annotations in M2 format and also has two times more sentences.
If you use this dataset, please use following citation:
@article{naplava2019wnut,
title={Grammatical Error Correction in Low-Resource Scenarios},
author={N{\'a}plava, Jakub and Straka, Milan},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.00353},
year={2019}
}
Automatically generated spelling correction corpus for Czech (Czesl-SEC-AG) is a corpus containg text with automatically generated spelling errors. To create spelling errors, a character error model containing probabilities of character substitution, insertion, deletion and probabilities of swaping two adjacent characters is used. Besides these probabilities, also the probabilities of changing character casing are considered. The original clean text on which the spelling errors were generated is PDT3.0 (http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-097C-0000-0023-1AAF-3). The original train/dev/test sentence split of PDT3.0 corpus is preserved in this dataset.
Besides the data with artificial spelling errors, we also publish texts from which the character error model was created. These are the original manual transcript of an audiobook Švejk and its corrected version performed by authors of Korektor (http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/korektor). These data are similarly to CzeSL Grammatical Error Correction Dataset (CzeSL-GEC: http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-2143) processed into four sets based on error difficulty present.
CoNLL 2017 and 2018 shared tasks:
Multilingual Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies
This package contains the test data in the form in which they ware presented
to the participating systems: raw text files and files preprocessed by UDPipe.
The metadata.json files contain lists of files to process and to output;
README files in the respective folders describe the syntax of metadata.json.
For full training, development and gold standard test data, see
Universal Dependencies 2.0 (CoNLL 2017)
Universal Dependencies 2.2 (CoNLL 2018)
See the download links at http://universaldependencies.org/.
For more information on the shared tasks, see
http://universaldependencies.org/conll17/
http://universaldependencies.org/conll18/
Contents:
conll17-ud-test-2017-05-09 ... CoNLL 2017 test data
conll18-ud-test-2018-05-06 ... CoNLL 2018 test data
conll18-ud-test-2018-05-06-for-conll17 ... CoNLL 2018 test data with metadata
and filenames modified so that it is digestible by the 2017 systems.
Baseline UDPipe models for CoNLL 2017 Shared Task in UD Parsing, and supplementary material.
The models require UDPipe version at least 1.1 and are evaluated using the official evaluation script.
The models are trained on a slightly different split of the official UD 2.0 CoNLL 2017 training data, so called baselinemodel split, in order to allow comparison of models even during the shared task. This baselinemodel split of UD 2.0 CoNLL 2017 training data is available for download.
Furthermore, we also provide UD 2.0 CoNLL 2017 training data with automatically predicted morphology. We utilize the baseline models on development data and perform 10-fold jack-knifing (each fold is predicted with a model trained on the rest of the folds) on the training data.
Finally, we supply all required data and hyperparameter values needed to replicate the baseline models.
Baseline UDPipe models for CoNLL 2018 Shared Task in UD Parsing, and supplementary material.
The models require UDPipe version at least 1.2 and are evaluated using the official evaluation script. The models were trained using a custom data split for treebanks where no development data is provided. Also, we trained an additional "Mixed" model, which uses 200 sentences from every training data. All information needed to replicate the model training (hyperparameters, modified train-dev split, and pre-computed word embeddings for the parser) are included in the archive.
Additionaly, we provide UD 2.2 CoNLL 2018 training data with automatically predicted morphology. We utilize the baseline models on development data and perform 10-fold jack-knifing (each fold is predicted with a model trained on the rest of the folds) on the training data.
Corpus of texts in 12 languages. For each language, we provide one training, one development and one testing set acquired from Wikipedia articles. Moreover, each language dataset contains (substantially larger) training set collected from (general) Web texts. All sets, except for Wikipedia and Web training sets that can contain similar sentences, are disjoint. Data are segmented into sentences which are further word tokenized.
All data in the corpus contain diacritics. To strip diacritics from them, use Python script diacritization_stripping.py contained within attached stripping_diacritics.zip. This script has two modes. We generally recommend using method called uninames, which for some languages behaves better.
The code for training recurrent neural-network based model for diacritics restoration is located at https://github.com/arahusky/diacritics_restoration.
This submission contains trained end-to-end models for the Neural Monkey toolkit for Czech and English, solving three NLP tasks: machine translation, image captioning, and sentiment analysis.
The models are trained on standard datasets and achieve state-of-the-art or near state-of-the-art performance in the tasks.
The models are described in the accompanying paper.
The same models can also be invoked via the online demo: https://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/grants/lsd
There are several separate ZIP archives here, each containing one model solving one of the tasks for one language.
To use a model, you first need to install Neural Monkey: https://github.com/ufal/neuralmonkey
To ensure correct functioning of the model, please use the exact version of Neural Monkey specified by the commit hash stored in the 'git_commit' file in the model directory.
Each model directory contains a 'run.ini' Neural Monkey configuration file, to be used to run the model. See the Neural Monkey documentation to learn how to do that (you may need to update some paths to correspond to your filesystem organization).
The 'experiment.ini' file, which was used to train the model, is also included.
Then there are files containing the model itself, files containing the input and output vocabularies, etc.
For the sentiment analyzers, you should tokenize your input data using the Moses tokenizer: https://pypi.org/project/mosestokenizer/
For the machine translation, you do not need to tokenize the data, as this is done by the model.
For image captioning, you need to:
- download a trained ResNet: http://download.tensorflow.org/models/resnet_v2_50_2017_04_14.tar.gz
- clone the git repository with TensorFlow models: https://github.com/tensorflow/models
- preprocess the input images with the Neural Monkey 'scripts/imagenet_features.py' script (https://github.com/ufal/neuralmonkey/blob/master/scripts/imagenet_features.py) -- you need to specify the path to ResNet and to the TensorFlow models to this script
Feel free to contact the authors of this submission in case you run into problems!
This submission contains trained end-to-end models for the Neural Monkey toolkit for Czech and English, solving four NLP tasks: machine translation, image captioning, sentiment analysis, and summarization.
The models are trained on standard datasets and achieve state-of-the-art or near state-of-the-art performance in the tasks.
The models are described in the accompanying paper.
The same models can also be invoked via the online demo: https://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/grants/lsd
In addition to the models presented in the referenced paper (developed and published in 2018), we include models for automatic news summarization for Czech and English developed in 2019. The Czech models were trained using the SumeCzech dataset (https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/L18-1551.pdf), the English models were trained using the CNN-Daily Mail corpus (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.04368.pdf) using the standard recurrent sequence-to-sequence architecture.
There are several separate ZIP archives here, each containing one model solving one of the tasks for one language.
To use a model, you first need to install Neural Monkey: https://github.com/ufal/neuralmonkey
To ensure correct functioning of the model, please use the exact version of Neural Monkey specified by the commit hash stored in the 'git_commit' file in the model directory.
Each model directory contains a 'run.ini' Neural Monkey configuration file, to be used to run the model. See the Neural Monkey documentation to learn how to do that (you may need to update some paths to correspond to your filesystem organization).
The 'experiment.ini' file, which was used to train the model, is also included.
Then there are files containing the model itself, files containing the input and output vocabularies, etc.
For the sentiment analyzers, you should tokenize your input data using the Moses tokenizer: https://pypi.org/project/mosestokenizer/
For the machine translation, you do not need to tokenize the data, as this is done by the model.
For image captioning, you need to:
- download a trained ResNet: http://download.tensorflow.org/models/resnet_v2_50_2017_04_14.tar.gz
- clone the git repository with TensorFlow models: https://github.com/tensorflow/models
- preprocess the input images with the Neural Monkey 'scripts/imagenet_features.py' script (https://github.com/ufal/neuralmonkey/blob/master/scripts/imagenet_features.py) -- you need to specify the path to ResNet and to the TensorFlow models to this script
The summarization models require input that is tokenized with Moses Tokenizer (https://github.com/alvations/sacremoses) and lower-cased.
Feel free to contact the authors of this submission in case you run into problems!
The Czech Legal Text Treebank 2.0 (CLTT 2.0) annotates the same texts as the CLTT 1.0. These texts come from the legal domain and they are manually syntactically annotated. The CLTT 2.0 annotation on the syntactic layer is more elaborate than in the CLTT 1.0 from various aspects. In addition, new annotation layers were added to the data: (i) the layer of accounting entities, and (ii) the layer of semantic entity relations.
Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy České republiky@@LM2015071@@LINDAT/CLARIN: Institut pro analýzu, zpracování a distribuci lingvistických dat@@nationalFunds@@✖[remove]73