The site of Mohelno-Plevovce is situated below the water line of the Mohelno water reservoir (lower part of the Dalešice pumped-storage hydroelectric power plant). The site was repeatedly occupied during the Late Upper Paleolithic. We discovered three areas with in-situ artifacts within intact sediments. While two assemblages excavated so far in Artifact Cluster 3 are characterized by microlithic tools made on carenoidal blanks and utilization of local rocks, both assemblages in Artifact Clusters 1 and 2 differ significantly from Artifact Cluster 3 and represent different techno-complexes. Artifact Clusters 1 and 2 are characterized by prevailing erratic flint supplemented by several artifacts made on radiolarite and obsidian. Technology is characterized by long, narrow and straight blades and bladelets removed from bidirectional cores. The collection of tools is characterized by prevailing backed microblades, in several cases with a straight truncation. In one case the truncations form a rectangle. This techno-complex continuing the Gravettian technological tradition is similar to material from Brno-Štýřice that is currently dated to the large time span covering two millennia between 17 100 and 19 100 calBP., Petr Škrdla, Jaroslav Bartík, Jan Eigner, Tereza Rychtaříková., and Obsahuje seznam literatury
Mohelno-Plevovce was repeatedly occupied during the Late Upper Paleolithic. Two paved stone structures constructed from local stones have been excavated thus far. These structures are characterized by a high density of lithic artifacts within the paved area and a rapidly decreasing density away from the paved area - this is interpreted as a result of the "barrier-effect" of the covered area. The lithic tools are characterized by abundant splintered pieces, steeply retouched end scrapers, and tiny microlithic tools produced on carenoidal blanks. Utilized raw material types indicate good knowledge of local rocks including rock crystal and weathering products of serpentinite, as well as broad raw material networks including erratic flint imported from northern Moravia and Szentgál radiolarite imported from Balaton Lake area., Petr Škrdla, Jaroslav Bartík, Jan Eigner, Tereza Rychtaříková, Pavel Nikolajev, Miriam Nývltová Fišáková, Ladislav nejman, Michaela Polanská, Jan Novák., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy
Ořechov IV is a recently investigated Bohunician site located in southern Moravia, but outside the Brno Basin where most of the other known Bohunician sites are located. It appears to belong to the pure Bohunician industry with no bifacial technology detected. It was probably discovered in the 1930s and due to later errors in reporting its exact location, it was ‘saved’ from prospecting by amateur archaeologists for several decades. We have re-located this site in 2010 and have conducted numerous pedestrian surveys and subsurface testing. We have collected a total of 3214 artifacts (most of them recorded by GPS) and a small amount of ochre. Two-thirds of the artifacts were manufactured on Stránská Skála chert. The second most common raw material used was Krumlovský Les chert followed by very small numbers of other raw materials including erratic flint, a long-distance import. Up to 20 % of the artifacts were damaged by frost action and agricultural activities. Numerous Levallois points and evidence for bidirectional flaking support the Bohunician classification. Test pitting has confirmed the presence of undisturbed sediments with cultural material including 4 structured hearths. Results of radiocarbon dating of some of these hearths are consistent with Bohunician antiquity. Only one lithic artifact in association with a hearth was found insitu. It is likely that future subsurface testing will yield more artifacts., Petr Škrdla, Tereza Rychtaříková, Ladislav Nejman, Jaroslav Bartík, Alena Hrušková, Jan Krása., and Obsahuje seznam literatury
This study examines a polycultural site Hradiště u Louky located in southwestern Moravia. The main aim is to introduce a new archaeological and historical model based on data from the surface survey, metal detecting and probing. Mainly non-destructive methods were used in this research. A new settlement phase from Jevišovice culture was documented. The onset of Medieval settlement in the area most likely dates to post-Great Moravian and Late Hillfort periods. The most intensive anthropogenic activities date to the high Medieval period when a small castle fortified by a moat and a rampart was built. Archaeological artefacts from the younger phase of the Medieval settlement possess chronological features of the 2 nd half of the 13 th and the 1 st third of the 15 th century. Also, to clarify the sequence of the owners of the castle and possible causes of its demise, a revision of written accounts was performed., Jaroslav Bartík, Lenka Běhounková, Stanislav Vohryzek, Josef Jan Kovář, Hana Poláchová, Michaela Kokojanová, Hana Nohálová., and Obsahuje seznam literatury
Zuzana Jarůšková, Richard Bíško, Ivan Čižmář, Michal Přichystal, Petr Kos, Libor Kalčík, Samuel Španihel, Tereza Kašparová, Martin Kuča, Milan Salaš, Marek Lečbych, Jakub Halama, Barbora Tomešová, Adam Fojtík, Miroslav Popelka, Vendula Vránová, Tomáš Chrástek, Václav Kolařík, Blanka Mikulková, Jaroslav Bartík, Marek Kalábek, Tereza Tichá Krasnokutská, Zdeněk Hájek, František Trampota, Pavel Fojtík, Jakub Vrána, Vít Hadrava, Václav Kolařík, Jaroslav Dytrych, Jiří Kala, Arkadiusz Tajer. and Obsahuje seznam literatury
Richard Bíško, Ivan Čižmář, Jaroslav Bartík, Marek Lečbych, Pavel Fojtík, Marek Kalábek, Lukáš Hlubek, Martin Kuča, Irena Ženožičková, Michal Přichystal, Kateřina Červená, František Trampota, Arkadiusz Tajer, Vendula Vránová, Vít Hadrava, Jiří Kala, Dana Vitulová, Václav Kolařík, Blanka Mikulková, Tomáš Chrástek. and Obsahuje seznam literatury
Ivan Čižmář, Petr Kos, Michal Přichystal, Antonín Přichystal, Aleš Romanovský, Lubomír Šebela, Martin Kuča, Jaroslav Bartík, Petr Škrdla, Marek Lečbych, Arkadiusz Tajer, Blanka Mikulková, Svatopluk Bříza, Rudolf Feilhauer, Adam Fojtík, Miroslav Popelka, Marek Kalábek, Lukáš Šín, Lukáš Hlubek, Zdeněk Hájek, Alžběta Čerevková, Zdeněk Tvrdý, Jakub Vrána, Daniel Fryč, Richard Bíško, Jiří Kala, Dana Vitulová, Josef Unger, Dalibor Všianský. and Obsahuje seznam literatury
Michal Přichystal, Ivan Čižmář, Petr Kos, Lenka Sedláčková, Antonín Přichystal, Petr Gadas, Josef Unger, Martin Kuča, Richard Bíško, Jaroslav Bartík, Alžběta Čerevková, Eliška Kazdová, Michal Hlavica, Adam Fojtík, Miroslav Popelka, Kateřina Červená, František Trampota, Karel Kraus, Zdeněk Hájek, Jakub Vrána, Vít Hadrava, Marek Kalábek, Blanka Mikulková, Marek Lečbych, Jitka Kučová, Miroslav Dejmal, Lukáš Hlubek. and Obsahuje seznam literatury
Michal Přichystal, Jiří Svoboda, Lukáš Hlubek, Zdeněk Schenk, Kateřina Dlouhá, Petr Kubín, František Trampota, Jitka Kučová, Martin Kuča, Tereza Rychtaříková, Petr Škrdla, Jaroslav Bartík, Martin Novák, Sandra Sázelová, Soňa Boriová, Lubomír Dokoupil. and Obsahuje seznam literatury
Metabasic rocks of the Želešice type were one of the most intensively utilized raw materials used for the manufacture of Neolithic polished industry in the Middle Danube region. Primary sources are located in the Ophiolite Belt (formerly Metabasite Zone) of the Brno Batholith, approximately 5 km SW of Brno. All sites represent secondary workshops that are not located at the outcrops. Quarrying at the outcrops has not been directly confirmed for this period. The focus of this work is a complex description of a unique primary workshop recently discovered nearby primary outcrops. Recently obtained data has revealed new information about the lithic operational stages, morphology, dimensions and procurement of the raw material. Petrographic analysis reveals several subvarieties of metabasic rocks which were utilized to different degrees. Another goal of this work is to add to the debate regarding terminology of workshop sites., Jaroslav Bartík, Lukáš Krmíček, Tereza Rychtaříková, Petr Škrdla., and Obsahuje seznam literatury