Converted from MARCXML to MODS version 3.5 using MARC21slim2MODS3-5.xsl (Revision 1.106 2014/12/19)(EE patch 2015/05/15), Supralibros olomoucké jezuitské koleje., Na titulním listu rukou: "Collegij Societatis Jesu Olomucij Ao. 1693. Infirmariae inscriptus", Titulní list bez impresa, následuje 197 arabsky číslovaných mědyritinových tabulí s vyobrazeními členů řádu Tovaryšstva Ježíšova s popisnou legendou při spodním okraji. Autorské signování: J. G. Heinsch del. ; Joh. Christoph. Hafner sc. ; W. P. Kilian sc. ; Jeremias Kilian sc. ; Nypoort sc. ; P. I. Franck ; Georg. Chr. Insbruckner sc. ; Melch. Haffner sc. ; Bal. v. Westerhout scul. Pra. ; Carel Prevost del. Na oslední rytině se objevuje datace 1690., and Converted from MODS 3.5 to DC version 1.8 (EE patch 2015/06/25)
The article presents a review of the research activities of the Socio-Economics of Housing research team. The Socio-economics of Housing team is one of the research teams at the Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. The main research activities of the team include sociological research concerning attitudes towards housing in the Czech Republic, international comparisons of housing policies and social housing systems, and econometric simulations of policy reforms, like rent deregulation, the introduction of housing allowance and social housing, housing finance, housing market efficiency, and house price indices.
This article analyses the recurring topics in the epistemology of the leading 20th-century French sociologist and political theorist Raymond Aron, drawing on his doctoral dissertation Introduction à la philosophie de l'histoire (1938) and on a range of works he published in his later years. The author first discusses six different reasons for Aron's conspicuous absence from many contemporary handbooks on the social sciences: his deliberate avoidance of developing a system in his work, his disinclination towards abstract theoretising, his lack of interest in empirical research, and his refusal to specialise in one field, and also the changes that occurred in the social scientific context in which his work was received and changes in the surrounding political and social circumstances, most notably the collapse of the communist regimes. The author notes that a major feature in Aron's epistemological thought was his neo-Kantian awareness of the limits of strictly scientific knowledge, which he identified with the domain of causal analysis. The second crucial theme, recurring throughout Aron's work, is the indispensability of philosophy for providing the foundations for social scientific analysis, always in need of being positioned with respect to values. His enduring interest in international relations and contemporary history is taken as an indication of the third basic element of his epistemology: a passion for the analysis of singular events. The author concludes that, given his preoccupation with the singular and the particular, the key, albeit somehow implicit, aspect of his epistemology is the capacity for judgment in the Kantian sense.
Zájem současné sociologie a dalších společenských věd o výzkumy spokojenosti a štěstí zatemňuje skutečnost, že původně právě sociologie chtěla "štěstí“ poskytovat a nahrazovat tak náboženské přístupy ke světu. Tento implicitně náboženský charakter je patrný i v rané české sociologii v dílech prvních propagátorů sociologie, jako byl především Emanuel Makovička, a později (někdy jen dočasně) u některých následovníků a epigonů T. G. Masaryka, v meziválečném období zejména u Ladislava Kunteho, R. I. Malého, Alexandra Sommera-Batěka, Jindřicha Fleischnera a Jana Duška. Z hlediska vývoje české sociologie šlo o zcela okrajové postavy, ačkoli mnohé z nich vynikly v jiných oblastech, jako celek jsou nicméně vyjádřením jednoho z aspektů dobových teoretických úvah o společnosti, jejím uspořádání a vývoji, na který by nemělo být zapomínáno. Zatímco T. G. Masaryka a pozdější akademické sociology "omezoval“ vědecký charakter jejich práce, a i pokud směřovali k sociálnímu reformismu, oddělovali jej od teoretické sociologie, "sociologie vedoucí ke štěstí“ nalezla plné uplatnění ve vizích a ambiciózních projektech těchto amatérských takésociologů - třebaže skončily faktickými nezdary nebo ani nedošly praktického naplnění, ostatně stejně jako v případě jejich pravzoru, Comtova pozitivistického apoštolátu., The engagement of contemporary social sciences in happiness studies blurs the fact that, originally, it was sociology that offered to provide “happiness” with the intention of replacing religious approaches. The implicitly religious nature of the “happiness” movement was characteristic of early Czech sociology (e.g. Emanuel Makovička) and it was adopted by certain followers and epigones of T. G. Masaryk as late as during the interwar years (Ladislav Kunte, R. I. Malý, Alexandr Sommer-Batěk, Jindřich Fleischner and Jan Dušek). Whereas Masaryk himself and academic sociologists as a whole were “restricted” by the rules of scholarly work, or they made a clear distinction between their academic and social-reformist engagement, the afore-mentioned, predominantly amateur, sociologists fully employed “sociology as a way to happiness” in their ambitious visions and reformist projects. Th eir largely stillborn eff orts had (fortunately) a minimal impact on both society and the study thereof, but their efforts should not be forgotten entirely since they represent an important element of early Czech sociology., and Zdeněk R. Nešpor.