Number of results to display per page
Search Results
34782. Sociologický časopis
- Type:
- issue, normal, model:periodicalitem, and TEXT
- Language:
- Czech
- Description:
- 2
- Rights:
- http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public
34783. Sociologický časopis
- Type:
- issue, normal, model:periodicalitem, and TEXT
- Language:
- Czech
- Description:
- 1
- Rights:
- http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public
34784. Sociologický časopis
- Type:
- issue, normal, model:periodicalitem, and TEXT
- Language:
- Czech
- Description:
- 2
- Rights:
- http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public
34785. Sociologie jako cesta ke štěstí: česká verze
- Creator:
- Zdeněk R Nešpor
- Format:
- print, bez média, and svazek
- Type:
- model:article and TEXT
- Subject:
- teorie vědy, štěstí, pokrok (filozofie), theory of science, happiness, sociologie - dějiny náboženství, sociologie a náboženství, česká sociologie, sociology - history of religion, sociology and religion, Czech sociology, progress, 12, and 00
- Language:
- Czech
- Description:
- Zájem současné sociologie a dalších společenských věd o výzkumy spokojenosti a štěstí zatemňuje skutečnost, že původně právě sociologie chtěla "štěstí“ poskytovat a nahrazovat tak náboženské přístupy ke světu. Tento implicitně náboženský charakter je patrný i v rané české sociologii v dílech prvních propagátorů sociologie, jako byl především Emanuel Makovička, a později (někdy jen dočasně) u některých následovníků a epigonů T. G. Masaryka, v meziválečném období zejména u Ladislava Kunteho, R. I. Malého, Alexandra Sommera-Batěka, Jindřicha Fleischnera a Jana Duška. Z hlediska vývoje české sociologie šlo o zcela okrajové postavy, ačkoli mnohé z nich vynikly v jiných oblastech, jako celek jsou nicméně vyjádřením jednoho z aspektů dobových teoretických úvah o společnosti, jejím uspořádání a vývoji, na který by nemělo být zapomínáno. Zatímco T. G. Masaryka a pozdější akademické sociology "omezoval“ vědecký charakter jejich práce, a i pokud směřovali k sociálnímu reformismu, oddělovali jej od teoretické sociologie, "sociologie vedoucí ke štěstí“ nalezla plné uplatnění ve vizích a ambiciózních projektech těchto amatérských takésociologů - třebaže skončily faktickými nezdary nebo ani nedošly praktického naplnění, ostatně stejně jako v případě jejich pravzoru, Comtova pozitivistického apoštolátu., The engagement of contemporary social sciences in happiness studies blurs the fact that, originally, it was sociology that offered to provide “happiness” with the intention of replacing religious approaches. The implicitly religious nature of the “happiness” movement was characteristic of early Czech sociology (e.g. Emanuel Makovička) and it was adopted by certain followers and epigones of T. G. Masaryk as late as during the interwar years (Ladislav Kunte, R. I. Malý, Alexandr Sommer-Batěk, Jindřich Fleischner and Jan Dušek). Whereas Masaryk himself and academic sociologists as a whole were “restricted” by the rules of scholarly work, or they made a clear distinction between their academic and social-reformist engagement, the afore-mentioned, predominantly amateur, sociologists fully employed “sociology as a way to happiness” in their ambitious visions and reformist projects. Th eir largely stillborn eff orts had (fortunately) a minimal impact on both society and the study thereof, but their efforts should not be forgotten entirely since they represent an important element of early Czech sociology., and Zdeněk R. Nešpor.
- Rights:
- http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public
34786. Sociologie jako program: K neakademickému myšlení Ivo Možného
- Creator:
- Havelka, Miloš
- Type:
- article, model:article, and TEXT
- Language:
- Czech
- Rights:
- http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public
34787. Sociologie modernity - spojování nespojitelného
- Creator:
- Prýmková, Karolína
- Format:
- bez média and svazek
- Type:
- model:article and TEXT
- Subject:
- 20. století, věda, sociologie, sociologie modernity, science, 12, and 00
- Language:
- Czech
- Description:
- [autor recenze] Karolína Prýmková.
- Rights:
- http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public
34788. Sociologie po sociologii
- Creator:
- Alain Touraine and Kupková, Jana
- Type:
- model:article and TEXT
- Subject:
- sociologie, sociology, 18, and 316
- Language:
- Czech
- Description:
- The unity of the sociology now termed classical was not that of a theory or discourse about social organization, social actors or the ways in which social wholes change; it was the study of society defined as a set of interdependent mechanisms ensuring the integration or combination of mutually opposed elements: the individualism of the actors and the internalization of institutional norms in the service of collective integration. The primary historical reason for the decline of this classical sociology is that its most stable foundation, the opposition between haves and have-nots along with that between men and women, was slowly undermined by a series of great social movements based at once on a quest for liberation and on the idea of equality It was the crisis in the earlier representations of social life which provoked, beyond the decline of the earlier sociology, the creation of a new intellectual space in which a constellation of forms of thought arose which constitute today what may be called contemporary sociology, and which is a sociology of ultramodernity. It is no longer in terms of objective situations or evaluations, economic or otherwise, that the social actor is explained. It is the cultural actor, his image of himself and his demands that govern a rapidly increasing part of social life. Throughout the world and in all sectors of social life, actors are making a comeback. Reversal of the conception and role of institutions leads us to see them as instruments for the defence of individuals against norms. Today’s sociology is better explained by its future than by its past. The new sociology is already constituted as a set of questions and sensibilities, more widespread across the planet than any other previous form of social thought. But this de facto existence of the new sociology is not - not yet - accompanied by sufficient self-reflection., Alain Touraine, z angličtiny přeložila Jana Kupková., Tento text byl poprvé uveřejněn v European Journal of Social Theory 2007: 10 (2), str. 184-193, and Obsahuje bibliografii
- Rights:
- http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public
34789. Sociologie vědy a sociologická metateorie
- Creator:
- Petrusek, Miloslav
- Type:
- model:article and TEXT
- Subject:
- filozofie, philosophy, sociologie vědy, osvícenství, metateorie, vědění, historicismus, sociology of science, enlightenment, metatheory, knowledge, historicism, 5, and 101
- Language:
- Czech
- Description:
- Studie je věnována roz- manitým sociologizujícím, a později přímo i sociologickým způsobům, kterými v minulosti byla a dodnes je věda uchopována. Do sociologie se věda jako výzkumný předmět dostává spolu s osvícenskou ideou pokroku, na kterou v první polovině 19. století navazuje Auguste Comte. Teprve sociologie 20. století se však zbavila „historicismu", kterým byla sociologie nejen Comtova, ale samozřejmě i Marxova určována. Od 30. let minulého století (Merton) se pak věda stává zvláštním sociologickým tématem, které bude s postupujícím časem nabývat na síle (až po nedávný bloorovský a latourovský obrat). V samostatné části se pak prof. Petrusek věnuje fenoménem zpochybňování vědy, který spojuje s proměnami samotných našich společností. Svoji studii uzavírá zamyšlením se nad sociologickou metateorií., This study focuses on various forms of sociological accounts and understandings of science. It demonstrates that as an explanatory topic science enters the field of sociology together with the Enlightenment's idea of progress, which is then followed up by Auguste Comte in the early 19th century. However, it had taken many decades before sociologists were able to free themselves of " historicist" ways of thinking, which can easily be traced in Comte's and Marx's writings. Since the 1930s, science has become a distinct research topic within sociology (with Robert K. Merton as a leading figure) that is nowadays more and more in the centre of systematic disciplinary interest (with David Bloor or Bruno Latour as leading figures). In the final parts, the author inquires into the arguments against science and associates these arguments with the transformations of societies. Also the role of sociological metatheory is aligned with the prospects of socio- logical accounts of science., and Miloslav Petrusek.
- Rights:
- http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public
34790. Sociologie vědy a sociologická metateorie
- Creator:
- Miloslav Petrusek
- Type:
- model:article and TEXT
- Subject:
- sociologie, sociologické teorie, sociologie vědy, sociology, sociological theories, sociology of science, 1, and 316.7
- Language:
- Czech
- Description:
- The article surveys the ways science was thematized as a sociological subject. It starts with the reflections on knowledge and science in the Enlightenment, further reviews the main contributions of Comtean philosophy and sociology of science, stresses Merton’s role in making the traditional sociology of knowledge open to empirical research, and traces the subsequent development of the field: the progress of quantitative analyses and ethnographic researches of science, the Kuhnian turn towards historicizing and Foucaultian turn towards the politics of science, the evolution of cognitive sociology of science, as well as the inspirations drawn from works of Bloor, Barnes, and Latour., Miloslav Petrusek., and Obsahuje bibliografii
- Rights:
- http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public