Search

Start Over Format bez média Date Unknown

6743. Dva mimořádné hroby z laténského pohřebiště v Rousínově

Creator:
Čižmář, Ivan, Mikulková, Blanka, Kmošek, Matěj, Chovanec, Michal, and Kala, Jiří
Format:
bez média and svazek
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
La Tène period, cemetery, South Moravia, female chain-belt, and warrior cremation
Language:
Czech
Description:
Development-led excavation in Rousínov in 2017 uncovered a La Tène cemetery in which 30 graves were excavated. Out of these, two exceptional graves, a rich female inhumation and a warrior’s cremation grave, are discussed in detail in this paper. In addition to typological determination of artefacts, the paper includes the results of a survey and conservation work on metal artefacts and anthropological analysis. The inhumation burial of a gracile woman at the age of about 30 years (H823) contained, among other things, a complete bimetallic chain-belt; its furnishing can be dated to LT B2/C1. The warrior’s cremation contained, among other things, an undeformed sword in its scabbard and a spear-head with an exceptionally decorated socket; the grave goods date to LT C1.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public

6744. Dva neznámé rukopisy k počátkům Jednoty bratrské v benediktinské knihovně v Seitenstetten

Creator:
Coufal, Dušan
Format:
bez média and svazek
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
Benedictine Library in Seitenstetten, Unitas Fratrum, Jan Rokycana, and Heinrich Insistoris
Language:
Multiple languages
Description:
This study presents for the first time in detail two manuscripts dealing with the beginnings of the Unitas Fratrum which are in the holdings of the Benedictine Library in Seitenstetten in Austria. Manuscript 72, dating from the beginning of the nineties of the 15th century, contains Latin translations of five letters written by the Czech Brethren to Jan Rokycana from 1489, which have been unknown till now and excerpts from five introductory chapters of the Síť víry (The Net of Faith) by Petr Chelčický, also translated into Latin in 1477. Manuscript 302 contains a copy of the record of an interrogation of four prominent Brethren in Kłodzko in 1480. This article indicates the possibilities of studying these texts, focusing on three main points: on their possible contribution to text tradition research, on research of the circumstances of the origin of their translations, and on the person of the scribe who made the collection. From the possible persons the inquisitor Jindřich Institoris has been excluded as his autograph doesn´t correspond with the writing of the scribe being looked for.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public

6745. Dva pohledy na vývoj českého poválečného syntaktického myšlení

Creator:
Karlík, Petr and Panevová, Jarmila
Format:
bez média and svazek
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
syntax, linguistic theory, structuralism, generative grammar, two-level valency syntax, functional generative description, grammar, lexicon, teorie jazyka, strukturalismus, generativní gramatika, dvourovinná valenční syntax, funkční generativní popis, gramatika, and slovník
Language:
Czech
Description:
The authors present their respective views on the development of the Czech post-war syntactic studies. Their approach is influenced by the fact that they were educated by the different syntactic schools: thus the paper is a combination of Prague’s and Brno´s views. V. Šmilauer´s Novočeská skladba (Syntax of Modern Czech, 1947) is understood as a source of the contemporary research of the Czech syntax. The paper describes the results reached by individual investigators as well as the results of the research teams. According to the authors´ opinion, Two-Level Valency Syntax (represented by F. Daneš and his close collaborators and reflected in the Czech Academic Grammar) and Functional Generative Grammar (developed by P. Sgall and his colleagues) form the main paradigms of the Czech syntax since 1960. Both theories incorporate the results of the classical Praguian functional approach as well as results of the generative paradigm. The authors conclude that the Prague‘s and Brno´s views on the development of Czech syntactic studies are not incompatible but rather complementary and that the methods of formal and corpus linguistics are attractive and useful for the young researchers.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public

6746. Dva příspěvky k otázce etnických menšin za Francouzské revoluce: zrovnoprávnění židovských obyvatel Francie a nebělošského obyvatelstva francouzských kolonií

Creator:
Grégoire, Henri, Brissot de Warville, Jacques-Pierre, Tinková, Daniela, and Jirsová, Klára
Format:
print, bez média, and svazek
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
francouzská revoluce (1789-1794 : Francie), Židé, French revolution (1789-1794 : France), Jews, 8, and 94(437)
Language:
Czech
Description:
překlad Klára Jirsová, ediční poznámky Daniela Tinková.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public

6750. Dva rozdílné postoje ke vzniku ČAVU: Antonín Rezek a Jaroslav Goll

Creator:
Jiroušek, Bohumil and Clarke, Melvyn
Format:
bez média and svazek
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
Czech Academy of Sciences, Antonín Rezek, Jaroslav Goll, and Josef Kalousek
Language:
Czech
Description:
Tento text je věnován problematice založení České akademie věd a umění (ČAVU) a postojům dvou výrazných osobností české historické vědy té doby - Antonína Rezka a Jaroslava Golla - k této nově zakládané instituci. Antonín Rezek se k záležitosti zvažovaného založení ČAVU vyjádřil již v polovině osmdesátých let 19. století v polemice s Tomášem G. Masarykem na stránkách časopisu Athenaeum. Zatímco T. G. Masaryk volal po založení nové vědecké akademie, Antonín Rezek byl zastáncem (finančního) posílení již sto let existující Královské české společnosti nauk, což ovšem řadě dalších vědců, včetně Masaryka, nevyhovovalo, neboť Královskou českou společnost nauk chápali jako instituci jazykově utrakvistickou (česko-německou), navíc v ní viděli jen malé množství řádných členů, zatímco oni se domnívali, že nově založená akademie by měla mít velmi rozsáhlý řádný počet členů, jakkoli si neuvědomovali, že ČAVU bude - podobně jako Královská česká společnost nauk - dlouhodobě trpět nedostatkem financí na podporu vědecké, zejména ediční činnosti. Při vlastním založení ČAVU tak byl jmenován přímo císařem Františkem Josefem I. jen omezený okruh řádných členů z nejstarší generace vědců, zatímco mladí univerzitní profesoři Antonín Rezek a Jaroslav Goll byli - teprve na jejich zasedání – zvoleni mimořádnými členy. Antonín Rezek nakonec pragmaticky mimořádné členství přijal a brzy se - už jako vlivný ministerský úředník - dočkal i členství řádného, Jaroslav Goll z uražené ješitnosti odmítl (údajně pro vážné chyby v základech ČAVU) a přijal teprve v roce 1907 rovnou řádné členství, když mu tuto volbu zajistil historik Josef Kalousek, pak se ovšem snažil ČAVU (zejména její I. třídu) ovládnout. Z postojů Antonína Rezka a Jaroslava Golla ke vzniku ČAVU a vstupu do ní můžeme vidět i jejich osobnostní rozdíly a charakteristiky. Zatímco Antonín Rezek, jakkoli muž velkého sebevědomí, byl schopen kompromisů, domluv se starší generací historiků, labilnější Jaroslav Goll toužil po tom, aby jeho autorita nebyla zpochybňována, aby byl považován za toho, kdo má rozhodující vliv - nemohl-li ho mít, ani v dané společnosti (jako mimořádný člen) být nechtěl., This text focuses on the issues surrounding the establishment of the Czech Academy of Sciences and Arts (CASA) and the attitudes towards this newly established institute held by two prominent figures in Czech historical scholarship at that time - Antonín Rezek and Jaroslav Goll. Antonín Rezek made his feelings felt regarding the planned establishment of CASA as early as the mid-1880s in polemics with Tomáš G. Masaryk on the pages of the Athenaeum journal. While T. G. Masaryk was calling for the establishment of a new scientific academy, Antonín Rezek was a supporter of (financially) bolstering the Royal Bohemian Society of Sciences, which had already been in existence for a hundred years. However, this did not go down well with scholars such as Masaryk, who understood the Royal Bohemian Society of Sciences to be a linguistically Utraquist (Czech-German) institution with only a small number of ordinary members, whereas they also believed that a newly established academy should have a broad range of ordinary members. However, they did not realize that like the Royal Bohemian Society of Sciences, CASA suffer over the long term from a lack of funding for scientific and especially publishing activities. When CASA was actually established, only a limited circle of ordinary members from the oldest generation of scientists and scholars were appointed directly by Emperor Franz Josef I, while their meetings elected the young university professors Antonín Rezek and Jaroslav Goll as associate members. Antonín Rezek eventually pragmatically accepted associate membership and as an influential ministerial official, he soon saw ordinary membership, whereas Jaroslav Goll rejected ordinary membership out of hurt vanity (allegedly over serious errors in the CASA foundations) and only accepted it in 1907, when his election was arranged by historian Josef Kalousek, and he then attempted to control CASA (particularly its First Class). Antonín Rezek’s and Jaroslav Goll’s attitudes towards the establishment of CASA and membership of it also indicate their personal differences and characteristics. While Antonín Rezek, albeit a man of great self-confidence, was capable of comprises and agreements with the older generation of historians, the unstable Jaroslav Goll did not wish his authority to be placed in any doubt and wanted to be considered the one with the decisive influence. If he could not wield it then he did not wish to be a member (as an associate)., and Překlad resumé: Melvyn Clarke
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public

Limit your search

Show values starting with
more »

Show values starting with
more »

Show values starting with
more »

Show values starting with
more »

Show values starting with
more »

Show values starting with
more »