Papoušek versus Lupáč: polemika o výklad basilejských kompaktát z poloviny 15. století

Title:

Papoušek versus Lupáč: polemika o výklad basilejských kompaktát z poloviny 15. století
Papoušek versus Lupáč: Discussion on the interpretation of the Basel Compacts from the mid-fifteenth century

Creator:

Pálka, Adam

Identifier:

https://cdk.lib.cas.cz/client/handle/uuid:15485cfb-7159-454a-a123-d033c0c40225
uuid:15485cfb-7159-454a-a123-d033c0c40225

Subject:

Compactata (Basel Compacts), Council of Basel, Jan Papoušek of Soběslav, Martin Lupáč, and religious controversy

Type:

model:article and TEXT

Format:

bez média and svazek

Description:

The study follows the polemics between the Catholic Jan Papoušek of Soběslav and the Utraquist Martin Lupáč on the interpretation of the Compactata. The fact that Lupáč´s Sensus is a polemical reaction to Papoušek´s Edicio is raised for the very first time. According to Papoušek´s tractate, the Compactata were a temporary concession by the Council of Basel; whereas the Compactata were not limited in time according to Lupáč´s work. The two authors also differenty understood the document, by which the council allowed Bohemian and Moravian priests to provide communion in both kinds. According to Papoušek, the document was a license for Utraquists that was to be reevaluated by the Pope after the dissolution of the council, whereas Lupáč understood the document as an order to the Catholic clergy to provide communion sub utraque to the lay who requested it. There was also no agreement in terms of children taking Communion: according to Papoušek the Compactata forbid such practice; whereas according to Lupáč they do not include a ban on communion for children.

Language:

Czech

Rights:

http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
policy:public

Source:

Studia mediaevalia Bohemica | 2016 Volume:8 | Number:1

Harvested from:

CDK

Metadata only:

false