The response of effective quantum yield of photosystem 2 (ΔF/Fm') to temperature was investigated under field conditions (1 950 m a.s.l.) in three alpine plant species with contrasting leaf temperature climates. The in situ temperature response did not follow an optimum curve but under saturating irradiances [PPFD >800 µìmol(photon) m-2s-1] highest ΔF/Fm' occurred at leaf temperatures below 10°C. This was comparable to the temperature response of antarctic vascular plants. Leaf temperatures between 0 and 15°C were the most frequently (41 to 56%) experienced by the investigated species. At these temperatures, ΔF/Fm' was highest in all species (data from all irradiation classes included) but the species differed in the temperature at which ΔF/Fm' dropped below 50% (Soldanella pusilla >20°C, Loiseleuria procumbens >25°C, and Saxifraga paniculata >40°C). The in situ response of ΔF/Fm' showed significantly higher ΔF/Fm' values at saturating PPFD for the species growing in full sunlight (S. paniculata and L. procumbens) than for S. pusilla growing under more moderate PPFD. The effect of increasing PPFD on ΔF/Fm', for a given leaf temperature, was most pronounced in S. pusilla. Despite the broad diurnal leaf temperature amplitude of alpine environments, only in S. paniculata did saturating PPFD occur over a broad range of leaf temperatures (43 K). In the other two species it was half of that (around 20 K). This indicates that the setting of environmental scenarios (leaf temperature×PPFD) in laboratory experiments often likely exceeds the actual environmental demand in the field. and V. Braun, G. Neuner.
The species specific response of photosystem 2 (PS2) efficiency and its thermotolerance to diurnal and seasonal alterations in leaf temperature, irradiance, and water relations were investigated under alpine field conditions (1 950 m) and in response to an in situ long-term heat treatment (+3 K). Three plant species were compared using the naturally occurring microstratification of alpine environments, i.e. under contrasting leaf temperatures but under similar macroclimatic conditions. Thermotolerance of PS2 showed a high variability in all three species of up to 9.6 K. Diumal changes (increases or even decreases) in PS2 thermotolerance occurred frequently with a maximum increase of +4.8 K in Loiseleuria procumbens. Increasing leaf temperatures and photosynthetic photon flux density influenced thermotolerance adjustments. Under long-term heating (+3 K) of L. procumbens canopies with infra-red lamps, the maxima of the critical (Tc) and the lethal (Tp) temperature of PS2 increased by at least 1 K. Thermotolerance of the leaf tissue (LT50) increased significantly by +0.6 K. The effects of slight water stress on thermotolerance of PS2 were species specific. High temperature thresholds for photoinhibition were significantly different between species and increased by 9 K from the species in the coldest microhabitat to the species in the warmest. Experimental heating of L. procumbens canopies by +3 K caused a significant (p>0.01) upward shift of the high temperature threshold for photoinhibition by +3 K. Each species appeared to be very well adapted to the thermal conditions of its microhabitat as under the most frequently experienced daytime leaf temperatures no photoinhibition occurred. The observed fine scale thermal adjustment of PS2 in response to increased leaf temperatures shows the potential to optimise photosynthesis under varying environmental conditions as long as the upper thermal limits are not exceeded. and V. Braun, O. Buchner, G. Neuner.