Hudba je umění, dá se řící, že dokonce nejabstraktnější forma umění. Mizí v okamžiku, ve kterém byla stvořena, a po většinu času ji lidé nebyli schopni uchovávat jinak než v paměti nebo nějakou formou notového zápisu. Ani notový zápis však nepředstavuje skutečný záznam hudby, je to pouze předpis pro její opětovné stvoření a úspěch tohoto procesu závisí na zručnosti a vkusu interpreta. Vnímání hudby a její krásy je jedinečnou výsadou každého člověka a doprovodné subjektivní pocity závisejí na individuálním vkusu a kulturní predispozici. Otázku subjektivního vnímání ponecháme psychologii a na tomto místě se pokusíme popsat hudbu objektivně. Ve skutečnosti však nepůjde o skutečný popis hudby samotné. Objektivně jsme schopni popsat pouze hudební teorii, tj. nauku o tom, jak tvořit zvuky a souzvuky tak, aby to našemu uchu znělo libě - tedy spíše jak nevytvářet hluk. Tvorbu neboli skládání a interpretaci hudby ponecháme příslušným géniům - skladatelům a interpretům., This article provides a description of the perception of sound, the characteristics of tone and physical principles of music theory. Melody and harmony are explained by Pythagorean tuning of the three, five, and seven tone scale of notation along with just and tempered tuning., Vladimír Scholtz., and Obsahuje seznam literatury
The second half of the 18th century marked an extraordinary flowering of music, especially church music in the Czech lands. Monastic churches, in particular, were characterised by a high level of music production performed by choral scholars whose liturgical music was conducted by chosen monks. Some members of religious orders also composed. These were for example M. J. Haberhauer (1746-1799), a member of the Benedictine order situated in Rajhrad near Brno and P. J. Marek (1748-1806) who belonged to the Augustinian monastery in Brno. Both of them got a musical education as choral scholars and remained musically active also after entering orders. Eventually these two authors both performed as chorregents in the 70’s and early 80’s of the 18th century and they collected sacred and secular pieces of music of their more famous and popular contemporaries (C. Ditters, F. X. Brixi, Haydn, etc.). Apart from a few exceptions they were only composing liturgical works. Haberhauer bequeathed 90 compositions, most of whom composed of Mass for choir and solo accompanied with instrumental ensemble as well as vespers and motets. Marek, however, composed only 21 church compositions and most of them consist of Marian antiphons and litanies of Loreto. These were necessary at the Augustinians, given the honor rendered to the picture of Virgin Mary placed in their church. The two monasteries ran a mutual cooperation which can be proved by Haberhauer music collection preserved at Augustinians in Brno. Haberhauer work can be also found in the collections of other Moravian churches and also at Prague Benedictine order. While Marek’s compositions were exclusively connected to the Augustinian monastery in Brno. Their pieces of music are purely purposeful showing features of a musical classicism. Lives and works of both composers are now the subject of research of the author and of Pavel Žůrek from the Ins, Irena Veselá., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy
This study makes a contribution towards resolving the issues surrounding the interpretation of intermedia works that experimentally combine poetry, word, music and sound. The particular subject of this analysis is a project known as Scribbles by writing duo Jaromír Typt and Michal Rataj, which has seen the light of day both in the form of live performances and on two albums (Škrábanice [Scribbles], Zaškrábnutí [Scribbles more]), on which the present essay is also based.