Článek se zabývá některými důsledky otevřené vědy z perspektivy komunikace vědy a filosofie komunikace. Kromě čistě komunikačních a filosofických témat se text věnuje i otázkám tykajícím se procesu popularizace vědy prostřednictvím sociálních médií (zejména Twitteru a blogů). Článek se sestává ze tří oddílů: první navrhuje definici komunikace vědy a sociálních médií; druhý zkoumá proměnu komunikace vědy v éře internetu a zabývá se vlivem sociálních médií na komunikaci vědy; třetí a závěrečný oddíl přináší několik případových studií a filosofických postřehů. Nejdůležitějším, zde dosaženým závěrem je tvrzení, že sociální media vědu a vědeckou komunikaci proměnila. Twitter a blogy jakožto nové nástroje vědecké komunikace mohou být užitečné a smysluplné pro vědu i společnost. Sociální média mohou být navíc použita k usnadnění širšího zapojení občanů do diskusí o vědě., The aim of the present article is to discuss several consequences of the Open Science from a perspective of science communication and philosophy of communication. Apart from the purely communicative and philosophical issues, the paper deals with the questions that concern the science popularization process through social media (especially Twitter and blogs). The article consists of three sections: the first one suggests a definition of science communication and social media, the second examines the transformation of science in the Age of the Internet and considers the influence of social media on science communication, the third and final one presents some case studies and philosophical observations. The most important conclusion to be reached here is that the social media have changed science and science communication. Twitter and blogs as novelty tools of science communication can be useful and meaningful for both science and society. Furthermore, social media can be used to facilitate broader involvement of citizens in the discussion about science., and Emanuel Kulczycki.
We introduce the comments of the last four directors of Academy institutes, who were asked these three questions: In which direction will they lead the development of their institutes? What are they doing to achieve excellence in science? How will they evaluate the work in accordance with the new statutes governing Public Research Institution? The rubric was very successful and we sould like to express out thanks to all the directors who were willing to provide us their responses to our questions. and Odpovědi 4 ředitelů ústavů AV ČR na otázky redakce (pokračování)
We introduce the comments of four other directors of Academy institutes, who were asked these three questions: In which direction will they lead the development of their institutes? What are they doing to achieve excellence in science? How will they evaluate the work in accordance with the new statutes called Public Research Institution?
In the summer issue of Academic Bulletin, 53 directors of all Academy institutes were introduced. They will be in charge of their institutes during the next five years. In this issue, we have asked them three questions: In which direction they will lead the development of their institute? What are they doing to reach excellence in science? If they can lead the institutions in accordance with the new statutes called "Public Research Institutions".
This month we continue with the comments of the directors of all the Academy institutes, who were asked these three questions: In which direction they will lead the development of their institutes? What are they doing to achieve excellence in science? Can they evaluate the work in accordance with the new statutes called Public Research Institution?
We continue in introduction the comments of three additional directors of Academy Institutes, who were asked three questions. and Odpovědi 3 ředitelů ústavů AV ČR na otázky redakce ( pokračování)