Fr. Chodounský ; analyse chemické provedl Vácslav Bareš, biologické-chemické Vojtěch Netík, analyse Jan Šatava and Zvláštní otisk z X. ročníku Českých listů hospodářských, r. 1902
The aim of this article is to present a relatively complex linguistic analysis of the three-volume correspondence between Jiří Voskovec and Jan Werich (V+W). Focusing on the dialogic structure of these letters, its remarkable coherence and stylistic uniformity, we examine the research possibilities such text types may offer in the field of dialogue stylistics. This highly private correspondence draws attention to the transitions between written and spoken language, fluctuations between using literary and common Czech, as well as a frequent use of vulgarisms, which we interpret as a natural part of the authors’ shared idiolect. Another building block in the stylistic uniformity of the entire correspondence that is worth highlighting is the linguistic playfulness and languagebased humor, including V+W’s fondness for using, manipulating, and commenting on specific set phrases, in which they also intertwine Czech and English. Although English holds a prominent position both in terms of frequency of use and the variety of expressions, the letters actually display features of multi-lingual texts; this quality comes out also in the form of stating the authors’ opinions about Czech (or other languages). The multi-lingual flavor is not far from issues of intertextuality, which manifests itself in the form of a variety of quotations, paraphrases, references, or ad-hoc created fake proverbs. Another part of our analysis concerns V+W’s creativity in word-formation (especially on the part of Voskovec), as well as various grammatical phenomena. In morphology, the texts show a conspicuously high frequency of participles and the archaic short-form adjectives; in syntax, we observe the stylistic function of certain passive constructions, causativization of non-causative verbs, special kinds of ellipsis, and idiosyncratic patterning in marking information structure.
Kniha Petra Placáka Gottwaldovo Československo jako fašistický stát podle autora svým názvem vyvolává falešný dojem, že pojednává o Československu v letech 1948 až 1953, kdy byla jedinou držitelkou moci v zemi Komunistická strana Československa a její předseda Klement Gottwald byl prezidentem republiky. Pro toto období totalitního režimu v Československu by některé autorovy závěry byly přiléhavé, avšak dokazovat fašistický charakter režimu v Československu v letech 1945 až 1948, kdy zde vládla koalice stran Národní fronty, prezidentem byl Edvard Beneš, existoval kritický tisk a do značné míry fungovaly demokratické procedury, je podle jeho názoru zcela pomýlené. Autor polemizuje s některými Placákovými tezemi a uzavírá, že jeho kniha v konfrontaci s fakty nemůže obstát., Simply by its title, Peter Placák´s Gottwaldovo Československo jako fašistický stát (Gottwald´s Czechoslovakia as a fascist state) creates, according to the author of this article, the false impression that it is about Czechoslovakia from 1948 to 1953, when the Czechoslovak Communist Party was the sole holder of power in the country and its chairman, Klement Gottwald, was President of the Republic. Though some of the author´s conclusions about this period of totalitarian rule in Czechoslovakia might be apposite, to argue that the Czechoslovak regime from 1945 to 1948 was of a fascist nature, when the country was in fact governed by a coalition of parties in the National Front, and the President of the Repbulic was Edvard Beneš, a critical Press was in existence, and democratic procedures were largely respected, is, according to the author, simply erroneous. The author takes issue with some of Placák´s propositions, and concludes that in the light of the facts the book does not pass muster., [autor recenze] Jiří Pernes., Druhý ze 3 příspěvků v oddílu Tři hlasy k jedné knize: Konfrontace - kontrasty - kontexty, and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy