Comprehensive Arabic LEMmas is a lexicon covering a large list of Arabic lemmas and their corresponding inflected word forms (stems) with details (POS + Root). Each lexical entry represents a lemma followed by all its possible stems and each stem is enriched by its morphological features especially the root and the POS.
It is composed of 164,845 lemmas representing 7,200,918 stems, detailed as follow:
757 Arabic particles
2,464,631 verbal stems
4,735,587 nominal stems
The lexicon is provided as an LMF conformant XML-based file in UTF8 encoding, which represents about 1,22 Gb of data.
Citation:
– Namly Driss, Karim Bouzoubaa, Abdelhamid El Jihad, and Si Lhoussain Aouragh. “Improving Arabic Lemmatization Through a Lemmas Database and a Machine-Learning Technique.” In Recent Advances in NLP: The Case of Arabic Language, pp. 81-100. Springer, Cham, 2020.
Baseline UDPipe models for CoNLL 2017 Shared Task in UD Parsing, and supplementary material.
The models require UDPipe version at least 1.1 and are evaluated using the official evaluation script.
The models are trained on a slightly different split of the official UD 2.0 CoNLL 2017 training data, so called baselinemodel split, in order to allow comparison of models even during the shared task. This baselinemodel split of UD 2.0 CoNLL 2017 training data is available for download.
Furthermore, we also provide UD 2.0 CoNLL 2017 training data with automatically predicted morphology. We utilize the baseline models on development data and perform 10-fold jack-knifing (each fold is predicted with a model trained on the rest of the folds) on the training data.
Finally, we supply all required data and hyperparameter values needed to replicate the baseline models.
Baseline UDPipe models for CoNLL 2018 Shared Task in UD Parsing, and supplementary material.
The models require UDPipe version at least 1.2 and are evaluated using the official evaluation script. The models were trained using a custom data split for treebanks where no development data is provided. Also, we trained an additional "Mixed" model, which uses 200 sentences from every training data. All information needed to replicate the model training (hyperparameters, modified train-dev split, and pre-computed word embeddings for the parser) are included in the archive.
Additionaly, we provide UD 2.2 CoNLL 2018 training data with automatically predicted morphology. We utilize the baseline models on development data and perform 10-fold jack-knifing (each fold is predicted with a model trained on the rest of the folds) on the training data.
Lexicon of Czech verbal multiword expressions (VMWEs) used in Parseme Shared Task 2017. https://typo.uni-konstanz.de/parseme/index.php/2-general/142-parseme-shared-task-on-automatic-detection-of-verbal-mwes
Lexicon consists of 4785 VMWEs, categorized into four categories according to Parseme Shared Task (PST) typology: IReflV (inherently reflexive verbs), LVC (light verb constructions), ID (idiomatic expressions) and OTH (other VMWEs with other than verbal syntactic head).
Verbal multiword expressions as well as deverbative variants of VMWEs were annotated during the preparation phase of PST. These data were published as http://hdl.handle.net/11372/LRT-2282. Czech part includes 14,536 VMWE occurences:
1611 ID
10000 IReflV
2923 LVC
2 OTH
This lexicon was created out of Czech data. Each lexicon entry is represented by one line in the form:
type lemmas frequency PoS [used form 1; used form 2; ... ]
(columns are separated by tabs) where:
type ... is the type of VMWE in PST typology
lemmas ... are space separated lemmatized forms of all words that constitutes the VMWE
frequency ... is the absolute frequency of this item in PST data
PoS ... is a space separated list of parts of speech of individual words (in the same order as in "lemmas")
final field contains a list of all (1 to 18) used forms found in the data (since Czech is a flective language).
Model trained for Czech POS Tagging and Lemmatization using Czech version of BERT model, RobeCzech. Model is trained on data from Prague Dependency Treebank 3.5. Model is a part of Czech NLP with Contextualized Embeddings master thesis and presented a state-of-the-art performance on the date of submission of the work.
Demo jupyter notebook is available on the project GitHub.
A richly annotated and genre-diversified language resource, The Prague Dependency Treebank – Consolidated 1.0 (PDT-C 1.0, or PDT-C in short in the sequel) is a consolidated release of the existing PDT-corpora of Czech data, uniformly annotated using the standard PDT scheme. PDT-corpora included in PDT-C: Prague Dependency Treebank (the original PDT contents, written newspaper and journal texts from three genres); Czech part of Prague Czech-English Dependency Treebank (translated financial texts, from English), Prague Dependency Treebank of Spoken Czech (spoken data, including audio and transcripts and multiple speech reconstruction annotation); PDT-Faust (user-generated texts). The difference from the separately published original treebanks can be briefly described as follows: it is published in one package, to allow easier data handling for all the datasets; the data is enhanced with a manual linguistic annotation at the morphological layer and new version of morphological dictionary is enclosed; a common valency lexicon for all four original parts is enclosed. Documentation provides two browsing and editing desktop tools (TrEd and MEd) and the corpus is also available online for searching using PML-TQ.
The Prague Dependency Treebank 3.5 is the 2018 edition of the core Prague Dependency Treebank (PDT). It contains all PDT annotation made at the Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics under various projects between 1996 and 2018 on the original texts, i.e., all annotation from PDT 1.0, PDT 2.0, PDT 2.5, PDT 3.0, PDiT 1.0 and PDiT 2.0, plus corrections, new structure of basic documentation and new list of authors covering all previous editions. The Prague Dependency Treebank 3.5 (PDT 3.5) contains the same texts as the previous versions since 2.0; there are 49,431 annotated sentences (832,823 words) on all layers, from tectogrammatical annotation to syntax to morphology. There are additional annotated sentences for syntax and morphology; the totals for the lower layers of annotation are: 87,913 sentences with 1,502,976 words at the analytical layer (surface dependency syntax) and 115,844 sentences with 1,956,693 words at the morphological layer of annotation (these totals include the annotation with the higher layers annotated as well). Closely linked to the tectogrammatical layer is the annotation of sentence information structure, multiword expressions, coreference, bridging relations and discourse relations.