Current scientific theories strive to find one theory, which would describe the origin of life on Earth, but so far none were successful. To succeed i this field, one has to broader their view and accompany the scientific question with philosophy and set firmly the framework of research and define its borders. In order to assess the philosophical part of the work, one needs not to resort to new ideas only, because men and women in the past have already expressed their thoughts. They are however nowadays remembered only in history of arts and philosophy. In our recent article published in Nature Astronomy, we presented a very complex model for the creation of methane and its reprocessing to more complex organic molecules including nucleic acid bases from simple gaseous precursors. The purpose of this work is to show the reoeating cycle of the creation of complex molecules from CO2 and their subsequent destruction back to their basic parent molecules in comparison with the idea of Hieronymus Bosch. and Svatopluk Civiš.
Various types of artificial ant nests (formicaries) are described. These include simple laboratory types to more complex formicaries whose esthetic design is suitable for flat interiors. Formicaries facilitate not only the observation of natural ant behaviour inside a nest, but also of the remarkable practices used by young queens to appropriate the nest of a host ant species. In such equipment it is even possible to arrange a predatory raid by slave-making ants and observe their behaviour inside the attacked nest. Such observations would not have been possible in natural conditions. and Pavel Amcha.
This study seeks an answer to the question when and how the Czech romantic K. H. Mácha (1810–1836) started to be seen as a “modern” poet who could inspire authors writing decades after his death. The study proves that the image of “modern” Mácha as the first Czech poet to achieve the autonomy of art already existed between 1860 and 1890, and that Mácha’s artistic reputation grew constantly throughout the second half of the 19th century. This argument is based on a vast amount of evidence, mostly taken from literary journalism and criticism between 1858 and 1910 (the latter year seeing the centenary of Mácha’s birth).