P. Liessmann, an Austrian philosopher from the University of Vienna who is well-known for his essay "Theory of Uneducation". This work is critical of the European institutions of higher edication. The Council for the popularization of science of ASCR in cooperation the Philosophical institute of ASCR, organized a press conference and a lecture with Prof. Paul Konrad Liessmann, a well-known Austrian philosopher, awarded by the Austrian State Prize for Cultural Journalism in 1996 and Scientist Prize 2006 (2007). and Petr Hlaváček.
The study compiled as a part of EU prject ProAct ("Practical Regional Research and Innovation Policy in Action - the Efficient Tools for Regional Catching-up in New Member States" (Regions of Knowledge - FP6). The regional practices of innovation policy in eight EU member states are presented in case studies, elaborated for one region in each country with South Moravia representing the Czech Republic. South Moravian innovation policy is analyzed in three fundamental dimensions: strategy formation, policy deployment, and practices at the programme level. These are the constituent elements of the process that was defined by the ProAct consortium as so called "ProAct policy learning cycle". THe benchmark methodology (The ProAct Benchmarking Framework) was applied in the case studies to explore good pracices in regional innovation and research policy. In the study, the role of South Moravian Innovation Centre (JIC - Jihomoravské innovační centrum) is highlighted., Jiří Loudín, Adolf Filáček, Michal Kostka, Kateřina Tydláčková., and Obsahuje seznam literatury.
E-government becomes an important element of the emerging e-societies. There is a great diversity of strategies, policies and results related to its introduction. Educational and cultural conditions and possibilities are vital because they generate - or not - interests in ICTs and their various applications. So capacity building for e-government is a coplex porcess, not limited to introduciton of technological and organizational actions. Moreover e-government is costly and will require soon not only social but also econimic evaluation. These issues are explored in an illustrative case study of e-services in Poland. and Lech W. Zacher, Tomasz Białobłocki
The Council for the popularization of science of ASCR in cooperation the Philosophical institute of ASCR, organized a press conference and a lecture with Prof. Paul Konrad Liessmann, a well-known Austrian philosopher, awarded by the Austrian State Prize for Cultural Journalism in 1996 and Scientist Prize 2006 (2007). Konrad Paul Liessmann was born 1953 in Villach. He is professor at the Institute of Philosophy at the University of Vienna and the editor of Zsolnay’s PHILOSOPHICUM LECH series. and Luděk Svoboda.
The continuing development and improvement of the Academy´s Strategy AV 21 innovative project was one of the item at the Academy Assembly´s XLVIII Meeting. One of its task was also the Evaluation of the Research and Professional Activities of the Institutes of the CAS. The research evaluation of the Institutes of the CAS for the 2010-2014 period was focused on individual assessment units within individual Institutes; each assessment unit was evaluated by one of 13 field panels. The Academy Assembly is the foremost priority decision-making body of the Czech Academy of Sciences. Its meeting took place at the Municipal House in Vinohrady on April 21, 2016., [Luděk Svoboda]., and Autor užívá šifry lsd
The study presents some corpus-based results about dispositional reflexive constructions in Czech. One type of Czech dispositional reflexives expresses the evaluation of a mental state with regard to an event associated with the predicate (Snad se mu žije lehčeji.). The evaluation of experiencing an underlying event in a particular way is usually encoded lexically by an adverbial phrase, the licensing conditions of which have not yet been investigated both within Western formal approaches (''manner adverb'', ''some adverbial modification'') and within the Slavic grammatical tradition. Based on the analysis of corpus data, the formal (lexical, syntactic and prosodic) properties of this (explicit or implicit) adverbial argument will be examined. Then the frequency distribution of the adverbial argument (initial, preverbal, postverbal, final) within the clause will be established. Attention will also be given to the frequency of specific adverbs in both affirmative and negative clauses. Furthermore, an explanatory account of the adverbial selection in dispositional reflexives will be developed. When a reflexive verbal form is combined with an adverb (θ-identification), different main types of manner adverbs need to be distinguished, according to the semantic feature of ‘activation’ of the adverb [eval] and the θ-grid (<θ-Exp>, <θ- x>): obligatory evaluative (nerado ''unwillingly''), facultative evaluative (výborně ''excellently'') pragmatically evaluative (přirozeně ‘naturally‘) and non-evaluative adverbs (rozhořčeně ''indignantly'', rychle ''quickly''). Within the class of evaluative adverbs, one can further differentiate between primary evaluative adverbs (dobře ''well'') and secondary evaluative adverbs (vesele ''cheerfully''), according to their semantic structure. The behaviour of adverbs that do not define their pole as either positive or negative (normálně ''normally'', nějak ''somehow''), or those that can be tied contextually to both poles (zvláštně ''oddly'') will be outlined briefly. Finally, the proposed paper will discuss three distinct functions of the modifier sám, -a, -o (''alone'') in syntactic reflexives: autocausative, autoagentive and - last but not least - dispositional. and V této studii prezentujeme výsledky korpusového šetření z oblasti impersonálních reflexivních dispozitiv. Jeden typ českých dispozičních konstrukcí vyjadřuje hodnocení mentál-ního stavu se zřetelem k události specifikované predikátovým výrazem (Snad se mu žije lehče-ji.). Taková evaluace prožívání události je zpravidla lexikálně specifikována adverbiálními výrazy, jejichž charakteristika nebyla doposud v západních formálních popisech (''manner ad-verbs'') ani ve slavistické literatuře (''hodnotící adverbiální výraz'') podrobněji zachycena. Na základě pozorování korpusových dat nejdříve zjišťujeme formální prostředky (explicitního a implicitního) evaluativního adverbiálního argumentu. Zároveň statisticky vyhodnocujeme za prvé frekvenční distribuci slovosledné pozice adverbia (počáteční, antepozice, postverbální, koncová) v jednotlivých dispozičních strukturách a za druhé frekvenci konkrétních příslovcí jednak v kladných, jednak v záporných dispozitivech. Poté je podána teoretická koncepce ad-verbiální selekce v e-flexivních dispozitivech. Při spojení reflexivní formy slovesa s adverbiem (tzv. θ-identifikaci) rozlišujeme podle aktivace sémantického rysu [±eval] a θ-struktury (<θ- -Exp>, <θ-x>) obligátně evaluativní adverbia (nerado) od fakultativně evaluativních (výborně), pragmaticky evaluativních (přirozeně) a non-evaluativních (rozhořčeně, rychle). Dále dělíme třídu evaluativních adverbií podle jejich sémantické komponentní struktury na primárně (dobře) a druhotně (vesele) evaluativní. Okrajovou pozornost věnujeme i příslovcím, která svou pó-lovou specifikaci [pozitivně - negativně] bud’ blíže nedefinují (normálně, nějak) nebo naopak, která zároveň vystihují jak pozitivní, tak i negativní hodnocení (zvláštně). Na závěr vymezujeme tři funkce výrazu sám, -a, -o v reflexívních konstrukcích: funkci autokauzativní, autoagentivní a dispoziční.