This article presents results of using proton therapy after operation of patient with brain meningioma. After operation brain meningiomas is known to not rarely recur due to certain localization and growth of tumor into main cerebral vessels, nerves and other main brain structures. This creates certain difficulties in operative access and surgical intervention, i.e. tumor resection. Proton therapy sharply reduces complications and improves the quality of life of patients., Jamshidjon Alimov, Rustamjon Alimov, and Literatura
Účel studie: Hlavním cílem studie bylo odhadnout dosažení patologické kompletní odpovědi nemocných trpících lokálně pokročilým adenokarcinomem rekta po předoperační (neoadjuvantní) chemoradioterapii (CHRT) s využitím individuálních farmakokinetických parametrů 5-fluorouracilu (5-FU). Sekundárním cílem bylo hodnocení bezpečnosti a snášenlivosti léčby. Tato otevřená prospektivní studie podporovaná grantem IGA NS 9693–04/2008 zahrnula 34 dospělých s lokálně pokročilým karcinomem konečníku ozařovaných do celkové dávky 50,4 Gy ve 28 frakcích po 1,8 Gy 10–15 MV paprsky v režimu 5 + 2 (5 dní radioterapie, 2 dny volno) s kontinuálně podávaným 5-FU v i. v. infuzi 200–1000 mg/m2 po dobu 4–5 týdnů kontinuálně 7denní infuzí. Chirurgická resekce následovala 4–6 týdnů po ukončení CHRT a po klinickém restagingu. Hodnocena byla klinická a patologická odpověď na chemoradioterapii pomocí zobrazovacího (MR) a histopatologického vyšetření, vyjádřená v % jako reziduální choroba. Výsledky a závěr: Výsledek dokládá vztah mezi velikostí kumulativní dávky 5-FU a kumulativní AUC 5-FU (r = 0,61, p < 0,001). Podobný vztah byl prokázán mezi kumulativní AUC 5-FU a metabolickým poměrem (poměr dosažených plazmatických koncentrací neaktivního metabolitu dihydrofluorouracilu (5-FUH2) ku koncentracím 5-FU, r = -0,80, p < 0,0001). Kumulativní AUC korelovala se stupněm odpovědi na léčbu (r = – 0,53, p < 0,005) a určovala také stupeň toxicity léčby. Pokud bychom chtěli dosáhnout kompletní patologickou odpověď, pak by denní dávka 5-FU měla být u středně rychlého metabolizéra >350 mg/m2 a kumulativní AUC1–39 dní > 50 mg/L*h. U žádného z nemocných nebyla nalezena mutace v genu pro dihydropyrimidindehydrogenázu (DPD) a multidrug resistance-1 protein (MDR-1), přesto byla nalezena vysoká interindividuální variabilita v dosažených plazmatických koncentracích 5-FU, a to i s ohledem na cirkadiální rytmus kinetiky léčiva., Background and Purpose: The main goal of the present study was to estimate the early patients´response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CHRT) based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with curative aim in relation to plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-FU. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the safety and tolerability of the regimen. Patients and Methods: This open prospective study enrolles 34 adult patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, who received 5-FU 200 -1000 mg/m2 administered as a continuous i. v. infusion over 4–5 week and radiotherapy delivered with 10–15 MV photon beams at 1.8 Gy/fraction up o 50.4 Gy in 28 daily fractions for 5 days a week. Surgical resection with curative aim followed 4–6 weeks after the completion of CHRT and clinical restaging. Pathologic response evaluation and the rate of tumor regression was evaluated using tumor downstaging by MR, histopathological staging, and expressed as residual disease (%). Results and Conclusion: The outcome evidenced the correlation between the cumulative 5-FU dose and cumulative AUC of 5-FU (r = 0.61; p < 0.001). The similar relationship was demonstrated between the cumulative AUC and metabolic ratio (the plasma concentration od inactive metabolite dihydrofluotouracile 5-FUH2 to 5-FU; r = -0.80; p < 0.0001). The cumulative AUC was correlated with tumor regression rate (r = -0.53; p < 0.005) and determined toxicity grade. To reach pCR, the daily dose of 5-FU in patient with average metabolic ratio of 5-FUH2/5-FU should be >350 mg/m2 and the cumulative AUC1–39days > 50 mg/L*h. No mutation of gene for enzyme dihydropyrimidindehydrogenase (DPD) and mutidrug resistance-1 protein (MDR-1) were identified, although the interindividual variability of 5-FU plasma concentration was high, also with regard to circadial 5-FU pharmacokinetics variability., Jiří Grim, Miloš Hroch, Jaroslav Chládek, Ondřej Slanař, Jiří Petera, Jiřina Martínková, and Literatura 27
The clinical outcome of 153 Graves' disease patients treated with a wide dose range of radioactive iodine-131 (RAI) was analyzed retrospectively. Six to nine months after the first dose of RAI 60 patients (39%) were hypothyroid (or rather thyroxine-substituted) and 26 (17%) were euthyroid, while 67 patients (44%) did not respond properly: in 32 (21%) their antithyroid drug (ATD) dose could be reduced but not withdrawn (partial response) and 35 (23%) remained hyperthyroid or the same dose of ATD was necessary (no response). The outcome did not correspond significantly to the administered activity of RAI (medians 259, 259, 222, and 259 MBq for hypothyroid, euthyroid, partial, and no response subgroups, respectively), or the activity retained in the gland at 24 h (medians 127, 105, 143, and 152 MBq). The effect was, however, clearly, and in a stepwise pattern, dependent on initial thyroid volume (17, 26, 33 and 35 ml, P < 0.001) or activity per gram tissue retained at 24 h (6.02, 4.95, 4.75, and 4.44 MBq/g, P = 0.002). Also, higher residual level of thyrotoxicosis at the time of RAI treatment was connected with worse outcome. The dose-dependency of outcome was further analyzed. When our sample was divided into tertiles, according to the adjusted dose, the same modest success rates (47%) were seen in the lower and middle tertiles. However, doses higher than 5.88 MBq/g (the upper tertile) resulted in success rate of 75%. Finer division into decils has shown a threshold-like increase in cure rate between the 7th and the 8th decil. In the first 7 decils (doses ≤ 6 MBq/g) the complete response rate was 45 to 50%, in the 8th decil (6.0 to 7.8~MBq/g) it rose to 80% and was not further increased with increasing dose. Direct comparison of higher (> 6 MBq/g, cure rate 80%) and lower (≤ 6 MBq/g, cure rate 46%) doses gave highly significant difference (P < 0.001). With our dosing range we found a dose-dependent clinical outcome that suggests an optimum delivered dose near 6.5 MBq/g, resulting in successful treatment of ca 80% patients. and J. Čepková, J. Horáček, J. Vižďa, J. Doležal
Adjuvantná rádioterapia prispieva k lepším výsledkom u pacientov s karcinómom prsníka po prsník zachovávajúcej operácii. Ožarovanie celého prsníka je spojené s poškodením srdca a pľúc, zvýšením kardiovaskulárných ochorení a mortality, a vývojom karcinómu pľúc, teda s rizikami, ktoré sa môžu objaviť 15–20 rokov po liečbe. Ožarovanie prsníka v pronačnej polohe pacientky je jednou z možností ako redukovať radiačne podmienenú toxicitu u pacientiek s veľkými prsníkmi podstupujúcimi adjuvantnú liečbu. V kazuistikách poukážeme na rozdiely v objeme srdca a pľúc pri oboch polohách, porovnáme dozimetrické parametre pri ožarovaní prsníka v oboch pozíciách a poukážeme na rozdiely pri ich plánovaní. Tieto techniky nie je možné kombinovať s ožiarením lymfatických uzlín, ale môžu byť použité pri liečbe obojstranných nádorov., Adjuvant radiotherapy contributes to better outcomes in patients with breast cancer after breast conserving surgery. Whole breast irradiation is associated with damage to the heart and lungs, increased cardiovascular mortality, and the development of lung cancer, that is, with the risks that may occur 15–20 years after treatment. Breast irradiation in the prone position, is one of the way to reduce radiation toxicity in patients conditioned with large breasts undergoing adjuvant therapy. In case reports point out the differences in the volume of the heart and lungs at both locations, we compare the dosimetric parameters in breast irradiation in both positions and point out the differences in their planning. These techniques can not be combined with irradiation of the lymph nodes, but they can be used in the treatment of bilateral tumors., Andrea Masaryková, David Lederleitner, and Literatura