Karcinom prostaty jako jeden z nejčastějších zhoubných nádorů a příčina smrti u mužů představuje vysoce závažný medicínský, ale i společenský a ekonomický problém. Diagnostika a následná léčba – jak kurativní, tak především léčba pokročilých stadií, včetně jejich komplikací – je proces, který je velmi náročný. Jednak pro pacienty, protože zejména časná detekce karcinomu prostaty se týká obrovské cílové skupiny mužů, jednak pro zdravotnictví, protože stále rostoucí incidence a prevalence karcinomu prostaty klade na systém nesmírné nároky organizační, personální a v neposlední řadě i ekonomické. Není možno říci, jaká je optimální léčba, protože onemocnění představuje velmi heterogenní skupinu, ale je třeba se pokusit odpovědět na otázku, jaká je optimální léčba u konkrétního pacienta a zda vzhledem ke stadiu onemocnění je ta která léčebná modalita možná a hlavně smysluplná. Autor se zaměřil na karcinom prostaty vyšších stadií a rizikových skupin a hodnotí možnosti provedení a výsledky jednotlivých léčebných modalit – radikální operace a radioterapie., Prostate cancer – one of the most common malignant tumours and cause of death in men – represents very significant medical but also social and economic problem. Diagnostics and ensuing treatment (both curative treatment and treatment of advanced stages, including associated complications) is a very complex process, not only for patients (because early detection of prostate cancer affects large numbers of men) but also for healthcare systems, because continuously increasing incidence and prevalence have significant organizational, HR and last but not at least economic demands. Owing to the heterogeneous nature of prostate cancer the optimal therapy is not clear. But we can try to determine the best treatment in an individual patient and assess if it is feasible and justified considering the individual prostate cancer stage. The author focuses on higher stage prostate cancer and higher risk groups and evaluates the feasibility and results of individual treatment options – radical surgery and radiotherapy., and Vít V., Čermák A., Pacík D.
The clinical outcome of 153 Graves' disease patients treated with a wide dose range of radioactive iodine-131 (RAI) was analyzed retrospectively. Six to nine months after the first dose of RAI 60 patients (39%) were hypothyroid (or rather thyroxine-substituted) and 26 (17%) were euthyroid, while 67 patients (44%) did not respond properly: in 32 (21%) their antithyroid drug (ATD) dose could be reduced but not withdrawn (partial response) and 35 (23%) remained hyperthyroid or the same dose of ATD was necessary (no response). The outcome did not correspond significantly to the administered activity of RAI (medians 259, 259, 222, and 259 MBq for hypothyroid, euthyroid, partial, and no response subgroups, respectively), or the activity retained in the gland at 24 h (medians 127, 105, 143, and 152 MBq). The effect was, however, clearly, and in a stepwise pattern, dependent on initial thyroid volume (17, 26, 33 and 35 ml, P < 0.001) or activity per gram tissue retained at 24 h (6.02, 4.95, 4.75, and 4.44 MBq/g, P = 0.002). Also, higher residual level of thyrotoxicosis at the time of RAI treatment was connected with worse outcome. The dose-dependency of outcome was further analyzed. When our sample was divided into tertiles, according to the adjusted dose, the same modest success rates (47%) were seen in the lower and middle tertiles. However, doses higher than 5.88 MBq/g (the upper tertile) resulted in success rate of 75%. Finer division into decils has shown a threshold-like increase in cure rate between the 7th and the 8th decil. In the first 7 decils (doses ≤ 6 MBq/g) the complete response rate was 45 to 50%, in the 8th decil (6.0 to 7.8~MBq/g) it rose to 80% and was not further increased with increasing dose. Direct comparison of higher (> 6 MBq/g, cure rate 80%) and lower (≤ 6 MBq/g, cure rate 46%) doses gave highly significant difference (P < 0.001). With our dosing range we found a dose-dependent clinical outcome that suggests an optimum delivered dose near 6.5 MBq/g, resulting in successful treatment of ca 80% patients. and J. Čepková, J. Horáček, J. Vižďa, J. Doležal
Solitární extramedulární plazmocytom (SEP) je velmi vzácné maligní onemocnění. Osmdesát procent SEP se objevuje v oblasti hlavy a krku. V dalších lokalitách se jedná často o náhodný histopatologický nález. Hlavní léčebnou modalitou SEP v oblasti hlavy a krku je radioterapie, která umožňuje dosáhnout lokální kontroly v 80–100 % případů. Diskutována je dávka radioterapie a klinický cílový objem, především potřeba ozařování spádových lymfatických uzlin s ohledem na toxicitu léčby. Radioterapie s modulovanou intenzitou je novým léčebným přístupem, umožnujícím snížení toxicity léčby., Solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma (SEP) is a very uncommon malignant disease. Eighty percent of SEP occurs in head and neck region. Other localizations of the disease are often accidental histopathological findings. The main therapeutic modality in SEP of head and neck region is radiotherapy, which enables to achieve local control in 80–100% cases. The dose of radiotherapy and clinical target volume are discussed, mainly the necessity of lymph node irradiation considering the treatment toxicity. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is a new radiotherapy approach which offers a treatment toxicity reduction., Milan Vošmik, Vladimír Maisnar, and Lit. 17