Článek se zabývá problematikou násilí v rodinách s mezinárodním prvkem, kdy řešením této
konfliktní situace je útěk rodiče s dítětem do země, z níž rodič pochází. Často jsou tyto situace spojeny
zejména se skutečností, že si osoby, které se rozhodnou založit rodinu v zahraničí, neuvědomí všechny
důsledky svého rozhodnutí a nezajímají se o právní režim své životní situace. Nadále se domnívají, že
ačkoliv žijí trvale v zahraničí, stále spadají pod jurisdikci své rodné země a orgány jejich rodného státu jsou
příslušné a schopné řešit veškeré jejich problémy a problematické životní situace. Článek uvádí několik
faktorů, které mohou mít vliv na vznik krizové situace v mezinárodní rodině, stručně definuje mezinárodní
únos dítěte, a rozebírá specifika návratového řízení v případech, kdy v rodině docházelo k domácímu
násilí.Věnuje se rovněž problémům spojeným s dokazováním domácího násilí, k němuž mělo docházet
v jiné zemi, a otázce postavení dítěte jako přímé a nepřímé oběti domácího násilí.V závěru autorky shrnují
doporučený postup, jak řešit problematickou situaci výskytu násilí v rodině s mezinárodním prvkem,
aniž by konflikt ještě musel být vyhrocen řešením mezinárodního únosu dítěte. and The article deals with questions of domestic violence in international families, resulting
in an escape of one parent, together with the child, to the country of origin. These situations are frequently
caused by the fact that those who decide to establish a family abroad do not realize all the
aspects of their decision and are not aware of the legal framework in place. They believe that, although
they live permanently abroad, their marriage is governed by the legal framework of their country of
birth and that their country of origin are capable of to solving their situations. The article names some
factors that can influence the development of a crisis in an international family, it defines shortly
international child abduction and analyses the specificity of return proceedings in the cases where
domestic violence in a family occurs. Also it tackles the problem of evidence of domestic violence
which allegedly happened in a foreign country, as well the question of the position of the child
as direct or indirect victim of domestic violence. Finally, the authoresses recommends a procedure
to solve a problematic situation of domestic violence in an international family, without the need
to escalate the conflict with the international child abduction.
Sociology and sociological theory have been effective in analyzing societal and institutional conflict and violence, but less so in analyzing the specifics of interpersonal violence. This article examines the sociological significance of domestic violence. This relationship, or sometimes its neglect, is underlain by several tensions and paradoxes, which in turn have broader implications for sociology, sociological theory and social theory. These matters are examined through: the possible paradox of violence and intimacy in the phenomenon of domestic violence; the importance of the naming and framing of such violence; explanation, responsibility and agency; and gender, hegemony and discourse in men’s violence to known women, as part of a multi-faceted power approach.
The aim of the paper is to present and analyse the current state of perpetrator programmes in Eastern European and Baltic countries as this issue has barely been raised in the literature. It is connected to the fact that in described region such programmes are still relatively new phenomena and, compared to other European Union countries (mostly in Western and Northern Europe), the number of the programmes is still insufficient. Moreover, the number and character of the perpetrator programmes in Eastern European and Baltic countries is to a large extent determined by traditional gender relations, glorification of the traditional family and specific definitions of masculinities and femininities, as well as by the nature of the anti-violence legislation that exists in particular countries. The presented findings result from research on the specificity of work with perpetrators of domestic violence in the region. The analysis is based on the cases of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania and Poland. It is to a large extent the result of research conducted within the Daphne III project IMPACT: Evaluation of European Perpetrator Programmes (2013-2014) and of analysis of national reports delivered by country experts for a project conducted by the Work with Perpetrators - European Network in 2013., Katarzyna Wojnicka., and Obsahuje bibliografii