In pondering how the existing evidence pertaining to the early Slavs in Bohemia and Moravia may be assessed, the paper rejects the arguments presented by Naďa Profantová, Felix Biermann, and Andrej Pleterski, in particular the idea of a migration of the early Slavs from western Ukraine and Bukovina into Bohemia and Moravia. The chronology of assemblages of the so-called “culture with Prague-type pottery” proposed by Profantová is demonstrably wrong, while Pleterski’s idea of a specifically Slavic “kitchen culture” rests on insufficient knowledge of the changes in eating practices accompanying economic transformations in the Mediterranean region during the sixth and seventh centuries. Against Biermann’s uncritical treatment of the written sources, particularly of Fredegar, the paper argues that the text of the Chronicle of Fredegar is not to be taken at face value, but understood as a means to please Fredegar’s Austrasian audience. and V úvaze o hodnocení stávajícího dokladového materiálu vztahujícího se k raným Slovanům v Čechách a na Moravě odmítá autor tohoto textu argumenty přednesené Naďou Profantovou, Felixem Biermannem a Andrejem Pleterskim, obzvláště myšlenku příchodu prvotních Slovanů do Čech a na Moravu ze západní Ukrajiny a Bukoviny. Chronologie souborů takzvané „kultury s keramikou pražského typu“, předložená Profantovou, je prokazatelně chybná, kdežto Pleterského myšlenka specificky slovanské „kuchyňské kultury“ spočívá na nedostatečné obeznámenosti se změnami v jídelních zvycích doprovázejících ekonomické změny ve Středomoří během 6. a 7. století. Proti Biermannovu nekritickému zacházení s písemnými prameny, zvláště s Fredegarem, namítá autor, že text Fredegarovy kroniky nelze brát doslovně, nýbrž je jej třeba chápat jako snahu vyhovět Fredegarovu autrasijskému čtenářstvu.
The paper is designed as a set of reflections of a rather general nature. It describes the presence of Vietnamese in the Czech Republic during the last twenty years. The text captures changes describable only in trends. These are gradual transformations of local communities into modern Central European diaspora or a transnational community. For Vietnamese in the Czech Republic, the impulse to solve their economic situation dominates in terms of objective causes as well as the subjective reasoning of individual participants of the transfer. Business activities played a major role in the development of the community life of Vietnamese. These were either uncontrolled (unofficial) street sales of goods, variously organized retail or sales in wholesale markets. Phases of Vietnamese entrepreneurship in the Czech environment: 1.
Uncontrolled street stall selling (1990-1992) following previous business activities from the 1980s, 2. forming of urban and border zone markets (1992-1995), 3. so-called golden times of markets (1995-1998), 4. gradual decline in stall sales in markets and shift of Vietnamese business into stores (1998–today). A significant difference of Vietnamese existence is the fact that it does not seek a new identity when it moves to another country. A Vietnamese businessman is more strongly enclosed in his own cultural habits; after moving he prefers financial profit not only for himself but also for his family back in Vietnam. The dominant form containing
classic purchasing and sales of cheap goods is slowly
disappearing, the interest in making money is transforming and the tendency to establish new associations is apparent.