INTRODUCTION: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) became standard of care for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) under the age of 65 years. We routinely perform ASCT for newly diagnosed MM since 1996 in our department. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all 285 transplants in 185 patients done for MM from January 1996 till December 2010. We analyzed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) regarding conditioning, stage, complete or very good partial remission (CR, VGPR) achievement, renal impairment, single vs. double transplant. RESULTS: Estimated 10-years survival of the whole set of patients is 39% (median survival 95 months). Patients with renal impairment show same OS as those without (p = 0.22). Patients show similar overall survival and event free survival regardless of type of transplant. We observed better outcome in terms of overall survival in patients treated with new drugs (p = 0.0014). Reaching CR or VGPR was not translated into better OS (p = 0.30) and EFS (p = 0.10). Also stage of the disease and whether single or double transplant was used did not make any significant difference in the outcome. CONCLUSION: Stem cell transplantation greatly improved outcome of patients with MM. Poor outcome of allogeneic transplantation in our group of patients is related to high transplant related mortality (20% vs. 0%) and unexpected high relapse rate. There is a trend towards better survival, when new drugs are incorporated at any time in the course of the disease. This fact supports hypothesis that use of these drugs with ASCT should translate into better long-term outcome. and J. Radocha, V. Maisnar, A. Zavrelová, M. Cermanová, M. Lánská, M. Kmonícek, L. Jebavý, M. Bláha, J. Malý, P. Zák
Mezi pojmem cílené léčby a individualizací léčby na míru mohou být často velké rozdíly. V naší kazuistice naopak prezentujeme si tuaci, kdy jedině léčba cílená byla u pacienta s kolorektálním karcinomem jako jediná spojena s klinickým benefitem. Kromě extrémní důležitosti chirurgie i u metastatického onemocnění by tak mohla být dokumentována potřeba vyzkoušet efekt cílené léčby u většiny pacientů, přestože se v její indikaci často nemůžeme opírat o žádné prediktivní faktory., There might be big differences between the terms of targeted therapy and treatment tailoring. In our case report we describe situation when targeted therapy as the only method was associated with a clinical benefit in a patient with colorectal cancer. In addition to extrem importance of surgery also in treatment of metastatic disease this could be a clear documentation of need to explore the effect of targeted therapy in the majority of patients although we are often unable to define any predictive markers for it´s indication, and Tomáš Svoboda