Search

Start Over Creator Urban, Petr Data provider Academy of Sciences Library/Knihovna Akademie věd ČR

2. Fenomenologie a interdisciplinarita: K otázce spolupráce fenomenologie a empirických věd

Creator:
Urban, Petr
Type:
article, model:article, and TEXT
Language:
Czech
Description:
Is the collaboration of phenomenology with non philosophical (particularly empirical) scientific disciplines an opportunity for phenomenology to de¬velop its potential and show its vitality, or does it rather constitute a risk, or even perhaps an unjustifiable excess and abandonment of its most essential methodological principles? Contemporary and classical phenomenologists do not adopt a united stance to this question. The Czech philosophical milieu typically treats this problem in a black and white framework: the collabora¬tion of phenomenology with other scientific disciplines is presented either as unproductive, even meaning less, or it is thought of as possible, desirable and full of promise. The main aim of this study is to present several distinc¬tions which are designed to provide a more supple and complex approach to the question of determining the correct possibilities and limits of the inter¬disciplinary collaboration of phenomenological philosophy.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ and policy:public

3. Filosofický časopis

Creator:
Urban, Petr, Filozofický ústav (Akademie věd ČR), Univerzita Karlova. Středoevropský institut pro filosofii, Rakouské kulturní fórum (Praha, Česko), and Geburt der Phänomenologie - Edmund Husserl zu Ehren (2010 : Praha, Česko)
Publisher:
Filosofia
Format:
183 s.
Type:
issue, normal, sborníky konferencí, special, proceedings of conferences, model:periodicalitem, and TEXT
Subject:
Husserl, Edmund, 1859-1938, 19.-20. století, filozofové, fenomenologie, novověká filozofie, philosophers, phenomenology, and modern philosophy
Language:
Czech and English
Description:
Mimořádné číslo 1 (2010/7), Geburt der Phänomenologie, Petr Urban (ed.)., Obsahuje biografické údaje, and Obsahuje bibliogr. a bibliogr. odkazy
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ and policy:public

6. Tělo a morální fenomenologie: Mezi Merleau-Pontym a Levinasem

Creator:
Urban, Petr
Type:
article, model:article, and TEXT
Language:
Czech
Description:
The “corporeal turn” which has taken place in 20th century thought, is closely related with the discovery of corporeality as a key motive of philosophical ethics. The aim of the present paper is to present and compare two phenomenological contributions to „bodily ethics“ – the fi rst one consists in an ethical interpretation of Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy, while the second one is explicitly contained in the thought of E. Levinas. The starting point of our analysis is the conception of intersubjectivity which diff ers radically in the thought of the two philosophers. While Merleau-Ponty stresses especially the primordial inter-corporeal resonance and empathy between myself and the other, Levinas’ view is based on the idea of an irreducible alterity of the other, which makes him to consider the relation between myself and the other as essentially asymmetrical. We attempt to show that the relation between Levinas’ and Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy of intersubjectivity is far more complex than it seems and that in order to develop the moral phenomenology of corporeality in a productive way, it is necessary to overcome certain one-sidedness both in Levinas and Merleau-Ponty. This overcoming is unthinkable without taking over the most productive motives of both philosophers’ views of intersubjectivity and corporeality and „Die Wende zur Leiblichkeit“, die in der Philosophie des 20. Jahrhunderts stattfand, ist untrennbar mit der Entdeckung der Leiblichkeit als Schlüsselmotiv der philosophischen Ethik verbunden. Ziel der Studie ist es, zwei phänomenologische Beiträge zur „leiblichen Ethik“ vorzustellen und zu vergleichen – der erste steht im Zusammenhang mit der ethischen Interpretation der Philosophie M. Merleau-Pontys, während der zweite explizit im Denken von E. Levinas enthalten ist. Ausgangspunkt der Interpretation ist die Analyse der Auff assung der Intersubjektivität, in der sich beide Denker deutlich voneinander unterscheiden. Während Merleau-Ponty insbesondere die primäre inter-leibliche Resonanz und Empathie zwischen mir und dem Anderen betont, baut Levinas auf dem Gedanken der nicht reduzierbaren Andersheit des Anderen, wobei er die Beziehung zwischen mir und dem Anderen als wesenhaft asymmetrisch betrachtet. Die Studie versucht nachzuweisen, dass die Beziehung zwischen der Philosophie der Intersubjektivität von Levinas und Merleau-Ponty weitaus komplexer ist, als es auf den ersten Blick erscheint, und dass für die fruchtbare Entwicklung einer moralischen Philosophie der Leiblichkeit die Überwindung einer gewissen Einseitigkeit sowohl bei Levinas als auch bei Merleau-Ponty erforderlich ist, Hand in Hand mit einer Anknüpfung an Levinas und Merleau-Ponty hinsichtlich der tragenden Motive ihrer Gedanken zur Intersubjektivität und Leiblichkeit.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public

7. Tělo druhého (zvířete) ve fenomenologii intersubjektivity

Creator:
Urban, Petr
Type:
article, model:article, and TEXT
Language:
Czech
Description:
The problem of intersubjectivity has, in modern philosophy, been traditionally bound up with the so-called problem of other (human) minds. This present study attempts to show that phenomenological approaches to the problem of intersubjectivity overcome the traditional intellectualist and mentalistic conceptions of intersubjectivity, and further that in some of their many varieties, they provide a promising way of overcoming the anthropocentric framework of this problem. Posing the question of the sense and character of animal-bodily co-existence leads to a phenomenology that transcends the concept of intersubjectivity in favour of the concept of interanimality. It also leads to the discovery of the phenomenon of bodily co-existence which shows itself to be fundamental for, among other things, the clarification of intersubjectivity in the narrow sense of experience with an inner aspect of the life of others.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public