The article deals with the use of different types of connectors in the adversative complex phrases in Old Church Slavonic and their Greek parallels. The most common and most frequent conjuntions are a, nž, and to a certain extent obače, whereas the particle že is mostly defined as adversative by the semantics of the clauses. In some manuscripts from the 18th and 19th centuries appart from the use of no and a, examples of adversative sentences with the conjuctions ami and tuku are frequent, which are common also in Standard Macedonian (but ami mostly in dialects). The conjuction tuku has developed from the adverb tolku and the conjunction ami is taken from the Greek vernacular ami. The use of conjunctions from other languages - ami from Greek and ama from Turkish which had a significant influence on the spoken (Slavic) language in Macedonia vis-à-vis the language used in the Old Church Slavonic manuscripts shows that it was common to accept a foreign language construction. However, it should be mentioned that both conjunctions in Standard Macedonian are used as a kind of stylistic specifity, usually in colloquial style. The development and use of new conjunctions could also be explained by the phonemic characteristic of the conjuntion nž, to lose the nasal and thus to become not expressive enough as adversative.
In this paper, I combine an exposition of the historical development of sociology and the philosophy of science from the era of grand theories onwards, with an explication as to why the grand theories have failed. First, I trace some parallels in the history of each of the disciplines. After presenting their chronological development, I scrutinize the metatheoretical findings about the disciplines and examine the main ontological and epistemic reasons why attempts at these general theories or frameworks have not succeeded. Among them are the lack of a universal methodology and of a theoretical core, together with the impossibility of achieving a common objective view. On this basis I conclude that general theories or frameworks are not achievable in principle. As it turns out, however, some contemporary social theorists and philosophers still harbor hopes that they can be successfully formulated, or at the least do not rule out such a possibility. Thus, in closing, I argue that the critical points can also be applied to these latest attempts, as the call for grand theories or frameworks has never ceased and returns regularly with each new generation of social theorists and philosophers of science. and Tento článek kombinuje přehled historického vývoje sociologie a filosofie vědy od období „velkých“ teorií s výkladem toho, proč tyto teorie selhaly. V první části sleduji historické paralely v obou těchto disciplínách. Po představení jejich chronologického vývoje analyzuji metateoretické závěry, které z toho vyplývají, a zkoumám hlavní epistemické a ontologické důvody, proč neuspěly – mezi nimi chybějící univerzální metodologii a teoretické jádro i nemožnost dosažení objektivního náhledu. Z toho vyvozuji závěr, že velké teorie nejsou principiálně zkonstruovatelné. Ukazuje se nicméně, že některé současní sociální teoretici i filosofové vědy stále doufají, že takové teorie nebo rámce mohou být úspěšně formulovány, nebo přinejmenším takovou možnost nevylučují. V závěru argumentuji, že kritika vznesená vůči těmto dřívějším teoriím může být uplatněna i na tyto aktuální pokusy. Ukazuje se totiž, že volání po těchto teoriích a rámcích nikdy úplně nepřestalo a opakuje se s každou novou generací sociálních vědců a filosofů vědy.
The modern generation of electronic detectors, such as the CCD, have made improved photometry possible, especially at magnitudes near photographic plate limits and at wavelengths extending to the near infrared. Vigorous efforts should now be made to extend measurements to longer wavelengths since VandenBerg and Bell (1985) have recently calculated BVRI synthetic isochrones. Consequently, we have embarked on a program of CCD BVRI photometry for determining the ages of globular clusters.
From BVRI CCD frames obtained with the 1.54 Danish telescope at ESO-La Silla we have at this moment completed the reductions of the following 5 globular clusters: NGC 104 (47 Tuc), NGC 2298, NGC 5139 ( 0) Cen), NGC 6121 (M4), and NGC 6362. For these clusters, we have derived ages all close to 17x10^0y. Providing strong evidence that the globular cluster system is coeval, and that the epoch of the galactic contraction was short.