The article presents a second part of an interpretation of the intention of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. The intention itself used to be considered a rather marginal topic until so called new-Wittgenteinian interpretations. The present article considers main sources to show what kind of content we can ascribe to the book. Its aim is to prove that Tractatus is not purely practical exercise, however, without stripping the book of its therapeutic side. This second part continues with interpretation of Wittgenstein’s correspndence with Russell, Frege, Ficker and comes to the conclusion for both parts considering mutual relation of all the sources., Článek představuje druhou část interpretace záměru Wittgensteinova Tractatus . Samotný záměr byl doposud považován za poněkud okrajové téma až do takzvaných novotavských interpretací. Tento článek se zabývá hlavními zdroji, které ukazují, jaký obsah můžeme knize přiřadit. Jejím cílem je dokázat, že Tractatus není čistě praktickým cvičením, aniž by se zbavil knihy o jeho terapeutické straně. Tato druhá část pokračuje výkladem Wittgensteinova correspndence s Russellem, Frege, Fickerem a dospěla k závěru, že obě části se zabývají vzájemným vztahem všech zdrojů., and Petr Glombíček
In Holan’s post-War poetic output, the cycle The Red Army Men (1947) enjoyshigh critical acclaim while the trio of his other works Thanks to the Soviet Union,A Memorial Service, and To You is regarded as a crude exercise in propaganda. Themain reason for this evaluative difference, my paper argues, is that the genre of thecycle enables the author to disseminate an ideological message similar to that of theunappreciated trio in a more subtle, less ostentatious manner. The first part of theessay analyzes the various techniques of portraiture employed by Holan to representordinary Russian soldiers (prosopopeia and ethopoeia). In the second part theideological potential of the genre is discussed. Since portrait by definition mustdepict an actual human subject, the very selection of the model and his/her featuresembroils such a work in a social reality and reflects the author’s attitude toward it.This worldview, however, is not added to the text mechanically, from without, butcomprises an integral part of the very mimetic apparatus that generates its overallmeaning.
The presented article is focused on the history of Russian and Czech folklore studies. It is based on the archive materials about N. E. Onchukov´s and J. Polívka´s plans to publish a collection of folklore texts and folklore research in Prague that were not realised.