Tento článek z pozůstalosti profesora Ladislava Tondla poukazuje na to, že hodnoty představují neodmyslitelný kontext komunikace a rozhodování. Vychází z předpokladu, že každý komunikační akt se odehrává za jistých okolností a podmínek, ve spojení se zjištěnou problémovou situací a ve vztazích s určitými potřebami a cíli a směry naší činnosti. Součástí těchto podmínek je soubor vlivů a okolností, které lze charakterizovat jako hodnotová atmosféra. Tato atmosféra a s ní spojené faktory mohou modifikovat význam dané komunikace, a to nejen v sémantickém smyslu, ale také ve smyslu relevance, důležitosti a potřebnosti daného sdělení., This posthumously published article by professor Ladislav Tondl argues that values present a necessary context of communication and decision making. Every communication act takes place under particular circumstances and conditions, in relation with an identified problematic situation and the corresponding needs and intentions or goals. A part of these conditions is made up of influences and circumstances that can be described as value environment. This environment can modify meaning of communication not only semnatically, but also in terms of relevance, importance and necessity of the message., and Ladislav Tondl.
The essay in this issue reflects the Ebola virus disease (EVD) by world-renowned immunologist Professor Ivo Hána. EVD first appeared in 1976 in simultaneously in Nzara, Sudan and in Yambuku, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). It was detected in a village in the DRC near the Ebola River, from which the disease takes its name. and Ivo Hána.
Článek se zabývá problematickou politické korektnosti ve vztahu k feministické fi losofi i vědy. Zaměřuje pozornost na užší pojem politické korektnosti – hodnotově motivovanou nekorektní práci s fakty. Konstatuje, že navzdory explicitnímu soustředění feministických autorek a autorů na význam hodnot v projektu vědy nelze chápat feministickou fi losofi i vědy jako politicky korektní nebo jako vybízení k politicky korektní vědě. Naopak se politicky korektní argumentace v tomto užším smyslu mohou dopou- štět i práce vystupující proti feministické či politicky korektní agendě ve vědě., The paper deals with the question of political correctness with respect to feminist philosophy of science. It focuses on a narrower notion of political correctness – treating facts incorrectly due to value motives. It finds that despite the feminist authors’ explicit focus on the importance of values in the scientifi centerprise, feminist philosophy of science cannot be understood as politically correct or as promoting politically correct science. On the other hand, politically correct arguments (in this narrower sense) can be used also by works speaking against the feminist or politically correct agenda in science., and Ondřej Beran.
In the presence of Deputy Minister of Education, Youth and Sports, Stanislav Štech, Rector of Charles University Tomáš Zima, Vice-President of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vladimír Mareček, and other important guests, the implementation phase of the BIOCEV project - the Biotechnology and Biomedicine Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and Charles University in Vestec was concluded on December 18, 2015. Full operation is beginning in January 2016. BIOCEV currently implements five research programmes and consists of six sets of research infrastructure and service laboratories. By 2020, as many as 450 researchers, including 200 post-graduate students, are supposed to work at the BIOCEV Centre. The Centre´s objective is to leam details about organisms at the molecular level that can be used in applied research and in the development of new therapeutic procedures. and Marina Hužvárová.
Dr. Petr Jehlička, Snr Lecturer in Environmental Geography at the Open University in Milton Keynes, United Kingdom, points out that some twenty-five years after the end of socialism, between one and two thirds of the East European middle classes still continue to grow some of the food consumed in their households - mostly not for economic reasons but primarily as their hobby. Nevertheless, social sciences in the West and a considerable part of scientific literature on home gardening in the global North continue to view this informal food production in Eastern Europe as an activity of mainly disadvantaged segments of society. He argues, moreover, that concepts generated in the Western context, where this activity is only marginal, are considered as universal knowledge, while data gathered in Eastern Europe, where household food production is dominant, are viewed as marginal and less interesting. He also describes ways in which Eastern Europe can contribute to broad international debates about this issue and various other topics in social sciences. and Jana Olivová.