The three larval instars of Megadytes (M.) carcharias Griffini and M. (Trifurcitus) fallax (Aubé) are described and illustrated in detail for the first time, with an emphasis on morphometry and chaetotaxy of the cephalic capsule, head appendages, legs, last abdominal segment and urogomphi. The ground plan of chaetotaxy of the genus Megadytes Sharp is described and illustrated based on three of the four recognised subgenera. First-instar larvae of Megadytes are characterised by the presence of a large number of additional sensilla on almost every part of the body. Primary chaetotaxy of the subgenera (Bifurcitus Brinck based on third instar) is very similar, with few differences including (1) shape of the setae on the anterior margin of the frontoclypeus; (2) presence or absence of a ring of multi-branched setae on distal third of mandible; and (3) number of setae on the urogomphus. A cladistic analysis of Dytiscidae, based on 169 larval characters and 34 taxa, indicates that: (1) Trifurcitus Brinck deserves generic status; (2) Cybistrini are not closely related to Hydroporinae; (3) the absence of a galea in Cybistrini is a secondary loss independent of that in Hydroporinae; (4) Cybistrini are well supported by many characters (including several aspects of first-instar chaetotaxy).
Phylogenetic relationships within the diving-beetle subfamily Hydroporinae are not well understood. Some authors include the genus Pachydrus Sharp, 1882 in the tribe Hyphydrini, whereas others are in favour of excluding Pachydrus from the Hyphydrini and placing it in its own tribe, Pachydrini. Larval characters have been underutilised in phylogenetic studies, mainly because the larvae of many taxa within the family are unknown. In this study, the phylogenetic relationships of Pachydrus are studied based on a cladistic analysis of 34 taxa and 122 morphological larval characters. For this purpose, larvae of P. obesus Sharp, 1882 are described and illustrated in detail for the first time, with particular emphasis on morphometry and chaetotaxy. First and second instars for the genus were unknown. The results support a monophyletic origin of the tribe Hyphydrini excluding Pachydrus, based on four unique character states. On the other hand, Pachydrus is resolved as the sister group of the Hydrovatini. These results suggest Pachydrus should not be placed in the Hyphydrini. Given that the Hyphydrini minus Pachydrus is a distinctive clade, based on this study, it seems useful to recognise this group as Hyphydrini. Including Pachydrus in Hyphydrini would leave the tribe with a single larval apomorphy, as most characters present in the Hyphydrini and Pachydrus are also present in the Hydrovatini. However, in the absence of larvae of Heterhydrus Fairmaire, 1869 and of a more comprehensive and inclusive analysis, we do not propose a formal exclusion of Pachydrus from Hyphydrini at this stage. Pachydrus is a highly distinctive genus within the Hydroporinae and is characterised by several larval apomorphies.