Examination of 4055 molluscs of 10 species from cenotes (= sinkholes) and other freshwater bodies in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico revealed the presence of-larval stages of 13 trematodes. The following species were found: Echinochasmus leopoldinae Scholz, Ditrich et Vargas-Vázquez, 1996, E. macrocaudatus Ditrich, Scholz et Vargas-Vázquez, 1996 (Echi-nostomatidae), Saccocoelioides sp. (? sogandaresi Lumsden, 1963) (Haploporidae), Crassicutis cichlasomae Manter, 1936, pleurolophocercous ophthalmocercaria sp. (Homalometridae), Ascocotyle (Ascocotyle) sp., Ascocotyle (Phagicola) nana Ransom, 1920 (Heterophyidae), Oligogonotylus manieri Watson, 1976 (Cryptogonimidae), Genarchella astyanactis (Watson, 1976) (Derogenidae), xiphidiocercariae sp. 1, 2 and 3 (Lecithodendriidae?), and furcocercaria gen. sp. (Fellodistomidae). The life-cycle of the derogenid Genarchella astyanactis was studied for the first time. It was found that it differs from that of G. genarchella: the first intermediate host, Pyrgophorus coronatus (Pfeiffer, 1839), released cystophorous furcocercariae of G. astyanactis that developed, after ingestion by the second intermediate host, copepods (experimentally Mesocyclops chaci Fiers, Reid, Ilife et Suárez-Morales, 1996), into metacercariae resembling by their morphology juvenile trematodes found in the stomach of Aslya-nax fasciatus. No progenetic cercariae (metacercariae) found in G. genarchella were observed in the life-cycle of G. astyanactis. Rediae and cystophorous furcocercariae were recovered from naturally infected snails and snails experimentally kept in contact with eggs from the uterus of G. astyanactis adults.
Some previous work on arthropod development is insufficiently detailed or incompletely reported. Much of the published information in this area is of limited use for the general analysis of life cycles. These difficulties arise primarily because many experiments do not control fully for the strain of the material (and even its specific identity) nor for rearing conditions, do not adequately take account of the complexity of life cycles and their stages, or are restricted to only part of the life cycle. For example, 285such factors as variable numbers of instars, sexual differences, abbreviated or hidden stages and dormancies may mean that the "average durations" reported apply to an unknown mixture of developmental types. Nor are experiments always designed or results reported and analysed in a logical and transparent manner. Undefined terms may obscure what actual developmental intervals were measured. Highly derived developmental or demographic measures may obscure core data. Statistical information may be inadequate. Such pitfalls are reviewed here, suggesting ways to ensure that results on the duration of development are both valid for specific studies and more widely useful. General experimental difficulties, recommended background information that should be provided, recommended life-cycle intervals and their terminology, and recommended ways to report numerical and statistical information are briefly summarized in tabular form.