Analysis of the cartel legislation and leniency programs in Germany and the Czech Republic

Title:

Analysis of the cartel legislation and leniency programs in Germany and the Czech Republic

Creator:

Kocí, Miloš

Identifier:

https://cdk.lib.cas.cz/client/handle/uuid:520df731-aaab-4cff-8514-c7288e772beb
uuid:520df731-aaab-4cff-8514-c7288e772beb

Subject:

leniency program, cartel law, effectiveness, and comparative study

Type:

article, model:article, and TEXT

Description:

Judging the influence of private law enforcement on the success of the leniency programs is a veryinteresting and current topic. When dealing with it, it is necessary to find an answer to following question:How should be handled the initiative of the European Commission to strengthen the private law pillar ofthe cartel law enforcement not to weaken the public law pillar at the same time? It is possible to assume thatthe support of private enforcement of damages discourages cartel participants to report the existence of acartel and avoid the fine imposed by the state, because by admitting a cartel they potentially face an evenlarger financial burden than in the case of a fine. However, the other point of view is, taking into account thevery low effort of the impaired parties (mainly consumers) to enforce their claims through private means,that the support of private enforcement should not be perceived as a danger to the functionality of leniencyprograms, but only as their suitable complement, which can exert sufficient pressure on the cartel participantsto perform their activities in accordance with law. The article strives to show that at the moment the supportof private enforcement of cartel law does not pose any danger to leniency programs and that the implementationof legal institutions proposed by the European Commission, which would emphasize the role of privateenforcement, is desirable.

Language:

English

Rights:

http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
policy:public

Source:

The lawyer quarterly: international journal for legal research | 2013 Volume:3 | Number:3

Harvested from:

CDK

Metadata only:

false