CorefUD is a collection of previously existing datasets annotated with coreference, which we converted into a common annotation scheme. In total, CorefUD in its current version 0.1 consists of 17 datasets for 11 languages.
The datasets are enriched with automatic morphological and syntactic annotations that are fully compliant with the standards of the Universal Dependencies project. All the datasets are stored in the CoNLL-U format, with coreference- and bridging-specific information captured by attribute-value pairs located in the MISC column.
The collection is divided into a public edition and a non-public (ÚFAL-internal) edition. The publicly available edition is distributed via LINDAT-CLARIAH-CZ and contains 13 datasets for 10 languages (1 dataset for Catalan, 2 for Czech, 2 for English, 1 for French, 2 for German, 1 for Hungarian, 1 for Lithuanian, 1 for Polish, 1 for Russian, and 1 for Spanish), excluding the test data.
The non-public edition is available internally to ÚFAL members and contains additional 4 datasets for 2 languages (1 dataset for Dutch, and 3 for English), which we are not allowed to distribute due to their original license limitations. It also contains the test data portions for all datasets.
When using any of the harmonized datasets, please get acquainted with its license (placed in the same directory as the data) and cite the original data resource too.
References to original resources whose harmonized versions are contained in the public edition of CorefUD 0.1:
- Catalan-AnCora:
Recasens, M. and Martí, M. A. (2010). AnCora-CO: Coreferentially Annotated Corpora for Spanish and Catalan. Language Resources and Evaluation, 44(4):315–345
- Czech-PCEDT:
Nedoluzhko, A., Novák, M., Cinková, S., Mikulová, M., and Mírovský, J. (2016). Coreference in Prague Czech-English Dependency Treebank. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'16), pages 169–176, Portorož, Slovenia. European Language Resources Association.
- Czech-PDT:
Hajič, J., Bejček, E., Hlaváčová, J., Mikulová, M., Straka, M., Štěpánek, J., and Štěpánková, B. (2020). Prague Dependency Treebank - Consolidated 1.0. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), pages 5208–5218, Marseille, France. European Language Resources Association.
- English-GUM:
Zeldes, A. (2017). The GUM Corpus: Creating Multilayer Resources in the Classroom. Language Resources and Evaluation, 51(3):581–612.
- English-ParCorFull:
Lapshinova-Koltunski, E., Hardmeier, C., and Krielke, P. (2018). ParCorFull: a Parallel Corpus Annotated with Full Coreference. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan. European Language Resources Association.
- French-Democrat:
Landragin, F. (2016). Description, modélisation et détection automatique des chaı̂nes de référence (DEMOCRAT). Bulletin de l’Association Française pour l’Intelligence Artificielle, (92):11–15.
- German-ParCorFull:
Lapshinova-Koltunski, E., Hardmeier, C., and Krielke, P. (2018). ParCorFull: a Parallel Corpus Annotated with Full Coreference. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan. European Language Resources Association
- German-PotsdamCC:
Bourgonje, P. and Stede, M. (2020). The Potsdam Commentary Corpus 2.2: Extending annotations for shallow discourse parsing. In Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 1061–1066, Marseille, France. European Language Resources Association.
- Hungarian-SzegedKoref:
Vincze, V., Hegedűs, K., Sliz-Nagy, A., and Farkas, R. (2018). SzegedKoref: A Hungarian Coreference Corpus. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan. European Language Resources Association.
- Lithuanian-LCC:
Žitkus, V. and Butkienė, R. (2018). Coreference Annotation Scheme and Corpus for Lithuanian Language. In Fifth International Conference on Social Networks Analysis, Management and Security, SNAMS 2018, Valencia, Spain, October 15-18, 2018, pages 243–250. IEEE.
- Polish-PCC:
Ogrodniczuk, M., Glowińska, K., Kopeć, M., Savary, A., and Zawisławska, M. (2013). Polish coreference corpus. In Human Language Technology. Challenges for Computer Science and Linguistics - 6th Language and Technology Conference, LTC 2013, Poznań, Poland, December 7-9, 2013. Revised Selected Papers, volume 9561 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 215–226. Springer.
- Russian-RuCor:
Toldova, S., Roytberg, A., Ladygina, A. A., Vasilyeva, M. D., Azerkovich, I. L., Kurzukov,M., Sim, G., Gorshkov, D. V., Ivanova, A., Nedoluzhko, A., and Grishina, Y. (2014). Evaluating Anaphora and Coreference Resolution for Russian. In Komp’juternaja lingvistika i intellektual’nye tehnologii. Po materialam ezhegodnoj Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii
Dialog, pages 681–695.
- Spanish-AnCora:
Recasens, M. and Martí, M. A. (2010). AnCora-CO: Coreferentially Annotated Corpora for Spanish and Catalan. Language Resources and Evaluation, 44(4):315–345
References to original resources whose harmonized versions are contained in the ÚFAL-internal edition of CorefUD 0.1:
- Dutch-COREA:
Hendrickx, I., Bouma, G., Coppens, F., Daelemans, W., Hoste, V., Kloosterman, G., Mineur, A.-M., Van Der Vloet, J., and Verschelde, J.-L. (2008). A coreference corpus and resolution system for Dutch. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’08), Marrakech, Morocco. European Language Resources Association.
- English-ARRAU:
Uryupina, O., Artstein, R., Bristot, A., Cavicchio, F., Delogu, F., Rodriguez, K. J., and Poesio, M. (2020). Annotating a broad range of anaphoric phenomena, in a variety of genres: the ARRAU Corpus. Natural Language Engineering, 26(1):95–128.
- English-OntoNotes:
Weischedel, R., Hovy, E., Marcus, M., Palmer, M., Belvin, R., Pradhan, S., Ramshaw, L., and Xue, N. (2011). Ontonotes: A large training corpus for enhanced processing. In Handbook of Natural Language Processing and Machine Translation: DARPA Global Autonomous Language Exploitation, pages 54–63, New York. Springer-Verlag.
- English-PCEDT:
Nedoluzhko, A., Novák, M., Cinková, S., Mikulová, M., and Mírovský, J. (2016). Coreference in Prague Czech-English Dependency Treebank. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16), pages 169–176, Portorož, Slovenia. European Language Resources Association.
CorefUD is a collection of previously existing datasets annotated with coreference, which we converted into a common annotation scheme. In total, CorefUD in its current version 0.2 consists of 17 datasets for 11 languages.
The datasets are enriched with automatic morphological and syntactic annotations that are fully compliant with the standards of the Universal Dependencies project. All the datasets are stored in the CoNLL-U format, with coreference- and bridging-specific information captured by attribute-value pairs located in the MISC column.
The collection is divided into a public edition and a non-public (ÚFAL-internal) edition. The publicly available edition is distributed via LINDAT-CLARIAH-CZ and contains 13 datasets for 10 languages (1 dataset for Catalan, 2 for Czech, 2 for English, 1 for French, 2 for German, 1 for Hungarian, 1 for Lithuanian, 1 for Polish, 1 for Russian, and 1 for Spanish), excluding the test data.
The non-public edition is available internally to ÚFAL members and contains additional 4 datasets for 2 languages (1 dataset for Dutch, and 3 for English), which we are not allowed to distribute due to their original license limitations. It also contains the test data portions for all datasets.
When using any of the harmonized datasets, please get acquainted with its license (placed in the same directory as the data) and cite the original data resource too.
Version 0.2 consists of exactly the same datasets as the version 0.1. All automatically parsed datasets were re-parsed for v0.2 using UDPipe 2 with models trained on UD 2.6. Catalan-AnCora, Spanish-AnCora and English-GUM have been updated to match the their UD 2.9 versions.
CorefUD is a collection of previously existing datasets annotated with coreference, which we converted into a common annotation scheme. In total, CorefUD in its current version 1.0 consists of 17 datasets for 11 languages. The datasets are enriched with automatic morphological and syntactic annotations that are fully compliant with the standards of the Universal Dependencies project. All the datasets are stored in the CoNLL-U format, with coreference- and bridging-specific information captured by attribute-value pairs located in the MISC column. The collection is divided into a public edition and a non-public (ÚFAL-internal) edition. The publicly available edition is distributed via LINDAT-CLARIAH-CZ and contains 13 datasets for 10 languages (1 dataset for Catalan, 2 for Czech, 2 for English, 1 for French, 2 for German, 1 for Hungarian, 1 for Lithuanian, 1 for Polish, 1 for Russian, and 1 for Spanish), excluding the test data. The non-public edition is available internally to ÚFAL members and contains additional 4 datasets for 2 languages (1 dataset for Dutch, and 3 for English), which we are not allowed to distribute due to their original license limitations. It also contains the test data portions for all datasets. When using any of the harmonized datasets, please get acquainted with its license (placed in the same directory as the data) and cite the original data resource too. Version 1.0 consists of the same corpora and languages as the previous version 0.2; however, the English GUM dataset has been updated to a newer and larger version, and in the Czech/English PCEDT dataset, the train-dev-test split has been changed to be compatible with OntoNotes. Nevertheless, the main change is in the file format (the MISC attributes have new form and interpretation).
COSTRA 1.0 is a dataset of Czech complex sentence transformations. The dataset is intended for the study of sentence-level embeddings beyond simple word alternations or standard paraphrasing.
The dataset consist of 4,262 unique sentences with average length of 10 words, illustrating 15 types of modifications such as simplification, generalization, or formal and informal language variation.
The hope is that with this dataset, we should be able to test semantic properties of sentence embeddings and perhaps even to find some topologically interesting “skeleton” in the sentence embedding space.
Costra 1.1 is a new dataset for testing geometric properties of sentence embeddings spaces. In particular, it concentrates on examining how well sentence embeddings capture complex phenomena such paraphrases, tense or generalization. The dataset is a direct expansion of Costra 1.0, which was extended with more sentences and sentence comparisons.
Document-level testsuite for evaluation of gender translation consistency.
Our Document-Level test set consists of selected English documents from the WMT21 newstest annotated with gender information. Czech unnanotated references are also added for convenience.
We semi-automatically annotated person names and pronouns to identify the gender of these elements as well as coreferences.
Our proposed annotation consists of three elements: (1) an ID, (2) an element class, and (3) gender.
The ID identifies a person's name and its occurrences (name and pronouns).
The element class identifies whether the tag refers to a name or a pronoun.
Finally, the gender information defines whether the element is masculine or feminine.
We performed a series of NLP techniques to automatically identify person names and coreferences.
This initial process resulted in a set containing 45 documents to be manually annotated.
Thus, we started a manual annotation of these documents to make sure they are correctly tagged.
See README.md for more details.
The dataset used for the Ptakopět experiment on outbound machine translation. It consists of screenshots of web forms with user queries entered. The queries are available also in a text form. The dataset comprises two language versions: English and Czech. Whereas the English version has been fully post-processed (screenshots cropped, queries within the screenshots highlighted, dataset split based on its quality etc.), the Czech version is raw as it was collected by the annotators.