Additional three Czech reference translations of the whole WMT 2011 data set (http://www.statmt.org/wmt11/test.tgz), translated from the German originals. Original segmentation of the WMT 2011 data is preserved. and This project has been sponsored by the grants GAČR P406/11/1499 and EuroMatrixPlus (FP7-ICT-2007-3-231720 of the EU and 7E09003+7E11051 of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic)
CzEng 1.0 is the fourth release of a sentence-parallel Czech-English corpus compiled at the Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics (ÚFAL) freely available for non-commercial research purposes.
CzEng 1.0 contains 15 million parallel sentences (233 million English and 206 million Czech tokens) from seven different types of sources automatically annotated at surface and deep (a- and t-) layers of syntactic representation. and EuroMatrix Plus (FP7-ICT-2007-3-231720 of the EU and 7E09003+7E11051 of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic),
Faust (FP7-ICT-2009-4-247762 of the EU and 7E11041 of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic),
GAČR P406/10/P259,
GAUK 116310,
GAUK 4226/2011
Czech-Slovak parallel corpus consisting of several freely available corpora (Acquis [1], Europarl [2], Official Journal of the European Union [3] and part of OPUS corpus [4] – EMEA, EUConst, KDE4 and PHP) and downloaded website of European Commission [5]. Corpus is published in both in plaintext format and with an automatic morphological annotation.
References:
[1] http://langtech.jrc.it/JRC-Acquis.html/
[2] http://www.statmt.org/europarl/
[3] http://apertium.eu/data
[4] http://opus.lingfil.uu.se/
[5] http://ec.europa.eu/ and This work has been supported by the grant Euro-MatrixPlus (FP7-ICT-2007-3-231720 of the EU and 7E09003 of the Czech Republic)
Manual classification of errors of Czech-Slovak translation according to the classification introduced by Vilar et al. [1]. First 50 sentences from WMT 2010 test set were translated by 5 MT systems (Česílko, Česílko2, Google Translate and two Moses setups) and MT errors were manually marked and classified. Classification was applied in MT systems comparison [3]. Reference translation is included.
References:
[1] David Vilar, Jia Xu, Luis Fernando D’Haro and Hermann Ney. Error Analysis of Machine Translation Output. In International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 697-702. Genoa, Italy, May 2006.
[2] http://matrix.statmt.org/test_sets/list
[3] Ondřej Bojar, Petra Galuščáková, and Miroslav Týnovský. Evaluating Quality of Machine Translation from Czech to Slovak. In Markéta Lopatková, editor, Information Technologies - Applications and Theory, pages 3-9, September 2011 and This work has been supported by the grants Euro-MatrixPlus (FP7-ICT-2007-3-231720 of the EU and
7E09003 of the Czech Republic)
Manually ranked outputs of Czech-Slovak translations. Three annotators manually ranked outputs of five MT systems (Česílko, Česílko2, Google Translate and two Moses setups) on three data sets (100 sentences randomly selected from books, 100 sentences randomly selected from Acquis corpus and 50 first sentences from WMT 2010 test set). Ranking was applied in MT systems comparison in [1].
References:
[1] Ondřej Bojar, Petra Galuščáková, and Miroslav Týnovský. Evaluating Quality of Machine Translation from Czech to Slovak. In Markéta Lopatková, editor, Information Technologies - Applications and Theory, pages 3-9, September 2011 and This work has been supported by the grant Euro-MatrixPlus (FP7-ICT-2007-3-231720 of the EU and
7E09003 of the Czech Republic)
Texts
The Prague Czech-English Dependency Treebank 2.0 (PCEDT 2.0) is a major update of the Prague Czech-English Dependency Treebank 1.0 (LDC2004T25). It is a manually parsed Czech-English parallel corpus sized over 1.2 million running words in almost 50,000 sentences for each part.
Data
The English part contains the entire Penn Treebank - Wall Street Journal Section (LDC99T42). The Czech part consists of Czech translations of all of the Penn Treebank-WSJ texts. The corpus is 1:1 sentence-aligned. An additional automatic alignment on the node level (different for each annotation layer) is part of this release, too. The original Penn Treebank-like file structure (25 sections, each containing up to one hundred files) has been preserved. Only those PTB documents which have both POS and structural annotation (total of 2312 documents) have been translated to Czech and made part of this release.
Each language part is enhanced with a comprehensive manual linguistic annotation in the PDT 2.0 style (LDC2006T01, Prague Dependency Treebank 2.0). The main features of this annotation style are:
dependency structure of the content words and coordinating and similar structures (function words are attached as their attribute values)
semantic labeling of content words and types of coordinating structures
argument structure, including an argument structure ("valency") lexicon for both languages
ellipsis and anaphora resolution.
This annotation style is called tectogrammatical annotation and it constitutes the tectogrammatical layer in the corpus. For more details see below and documentation.
Annotation of the Czech part
Sentences of the Czech translation were automatically morphologically annotated and parsed into surface-syntax dependency trees in the PDT 2.0 annotation style. This annotation style is sometimes called analytical annotation; it constitutes the analytical layer of the corpus. The manual tectogrammatical (deep-syntax) annotation was built as a separate layer above the automatic analytical (surface-syntax) parse. A sample of 2,000 sentences was manually annotated on the analytical layer.
Annotation of the English part
The resulting manual tectogrammatical annotation was built above an automatic transformation of the original phrase-structure annotation of the Penn Treebank into surface dependency (analytical) representations, using the following additional linguistic information from other sources:
PropBank (LDC2004T14)
VerbNet
NomBank (LDC2008T23)
flat noun phrase structures (by courtesy of D. Vadas and J.R. Curran)
For each sentence, the original Penn Treebank phrase structure trees are preserved in this corpus together with their links to the analytical and tectogrammatical annotation. and Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic projects No.:
MSM0021620838
LC536
ME09008
LM2010013
7E09003+7E11051
7E11041
Czech Science Foundation, grants No.:
GAP406/10/0875
GPP406/10/P193
GA405/09/0729
Research funds of the Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Czech Republic, Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic: No. 1ET101120503
Students participating in this project have been running their own student grants from the Grant Agency of the Charles University, which were connected to this project. Only ongoing projects are mentioned: 116310, 158010, 3537/2011
Also, this work was funded in part by the following projects sponsored by the European Commission:
Companions, No. 034434
EuroMatrix, No. 034291
EuroMatrixPlus, No. 231720
Faust, No. 247762
Testing set from WMT 2011 [1] competition, manually translated from Czech and English into Slovak. Test set contains 3003 sentences in Czech, Slovak and English. Test set is described in [2].
References:
[1] http://www.statmt.org/wmt11/evaluation-task.html
[2] Petra Galuščáková and Ondřej Bojar. Improving SMT by Using Parallel Data of a Closely Related Language. In Human Language Technologies - The Baltic Perspective - Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference Baltic HLT 2012, volume 247 of Frontiers in AI and Applications, pages 58-65, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 2012. IOS Press. and The work on this project was supported by the grant EuroMatrixPlus (FP7-ICT-
2007-3-231720 of the EU and 7E09003 of the Czech Republic)