The study pays attention to the formation of the research into Nativ Americans, as well as to the ethical issues connected not only
with the discipline of cultural anthropology, but also of museology,
archaeology, or cultural studies. The study reflects the development
in the attitude to Nativ Americans since the second half of the 19th
century. It describes the foundation of the Institute of American Ethnology, the formation of anthropology in the USA as well as the era of Franz Boas, one of its founders. It also reflects the criticism by Indian academicians. It points out the interconnection between political ideologies, relation to Indians (and all indigenous inhabitants of North America) and definition of research, most visibly especially in connection with applied anthropology It also focuses on contemporary trends, ethical codes, and the role of the Native American and Indigenous Studies within the context of decolonization.
Th e paper aims at identifying, explaining and illustrating the aff ordances of “creative nonfi ction” as a style of writing social science. Th e fi rst part introduces creative nonfi ction as a method of writing which brings together empirical material and fi ction. In the second part, based on illustrations from my ethnographic research of European “crisis reporters,” written in the form of a novel about a fi ctional journalist, but also based on a review of existing social science research that employs a creative method of writing, I identify several main aff ordances of creative nonfi ction in socialscientifi c research. In particular, I argue that creative nonfi ction allows scientists to illustrate their fi ndings, to express them in an allegorical way, to organize data into a narrative, to let their pieces of research act in the social world, and to permeate research accounts with self-refl exive moments. I also discuss some apparent negative aff ordances: challenges that creative nonfi ction poses to readers and to the institutionalized academic discourse. Finally, I suggest that writing about sociological problems in the style of creative nonfi ction can help to produce more engaging and engaged texts, and I discuss the ethical implications of the approach. and Článek identifi kuje, vysvětluje a ilustruje afordance „kreativní nonfi kce“ jako stylu psaní o sociální vědě. V první části představuji kreativní nonfi kci jako metodu psaní, která kombinuje empirický materiál a imaginaci. Ve druhé části na základě ukázek z vlastního etnografi ckého výzkumu evropských “krizových reportérů”, psaného formou románu o fi ktivním novináři, a také na základě jiných sociálněvědných výzkumů, které používají kreativní metody psaní, identifi kuji několik hlavních afordancí kreativní nonfi kce v sociálněvědním výzkumu. Kreativní nonfi kce zejména umožňuje vědkyním a vědcům jinak a někdy lépe ilustrovat jejich zjištění, vyjádřit tato zjištění alegoricky, organizovat data a vytvářet narativ, podpořit efektivitu výzkumů v sociálním světě nebo také proložit výzkumný narativ seberefl exivními prvky. Text ale diskutuje i zjevné negativní afordance, tedy výzvy, které potenciálně plynou ze setkání kreativní nonfi kce se čtenářstvem a s institucionalizovaným akademickým diskurzem. Nakonec diskutuji některé etické implikace představeného přístupu a tvrdím, že psát o sociologických problémech ve stylu kreativní nonfi kce může pomoct vytvářet texty, které budou angažované i poutavé.
One part of the theme ”ethics and folklorism” concerns the ethnologist and his/her research, the other one folklorism itself.
Ethics is not a frequented word in the other part, although this
phenomenon - because of its importance it has in the society -
would deserve it. In the dominating part of the entire phase of
folklorism, there is no extensive awareness of ethical effect of several activities. Today, it is very difficult to differ in particular regions or locations, what has survived as a relic of older
traditions, what has been included in them for various reasons, how the first arrangers, choreographers, whose results were often passed off as transmissions of original materials, proceeded at their flights of imaginations. The phenomenon that we could call as “folk culture free for use” remains big problem as well. Here we are also missing an ethica codex that, however, does not concern just ethnology. The general need for ethics in relation to cultural tradition is not deep-rooted at all by us. It is a widely social matter and it should concern cultural tradition in the legal sense of the word - not to exploit it, not to misuse it commercially, to understand it as a part of national culture. In addition to the research principles, it is thus necessary to promote generally the fact that nobody may behave destructively or unethically to cultural heritage of any nature.
The issue of ethics is reflected in all UNESCO conventions.
For ethnology, Convention on Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, Convention on the Protection and Promotion of
the Diversity Cultural Expressions, Convention on the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage are the most important ones. UNESCO is based on faith in universal values on which it also builds itsattitude to ethical aspects of the research. It tries to establish common values and criteria for all countries, taking into a
special account the development countries. It is the World
Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) that deals with the issue
of ethics in relation to traditional knowledge, traditional cultural
expressions, and folklore. The most important aspects for the
protection of cultural heritage include the respect for cultural
diversity among nations, and the protection from the misuse of
traditional knowledge and awareness including their
commercialization.
The article opens the basic issues of ethics in the case of
collection-creating and presentation activity of museums. It defines the contemporary position of museums within the modern information society as a space for memory transformation. It points out the ethical dimension of curator’s work, whose presentation and interpretation results are connected with the institution
more than elsewhere. The interpretation as well as the involvement
of the public into this activity is a fundamentally ethical task of the museum as a memory institution. In this connection, the running discussion concerns the model of the community museum or “eco-museum” as an institution that is defined by its relation to the organism (the museum) and its environment (the society). This institution distinguishes itself by the ability to respond to or to adapt itself to the conditions and to create a wide network of social relations.
This paper considers various approaches to love and morality in Protestant society in the late 18th century, as illustrated in Czechlanguage religious and educational literature (Korunka, aneb Wjnek Pannenský wssechněm pobožným a sslechetným Pannám toho Gazyku užjwagjcým, Litomyšl 1784; Kazatel Domovnj, Brno 1783). Our focus is on divine love, man’s love of God, marital love, parental and filial love, and definitions of immorality. We also examine some contemporary reactions to religious and educational writings in the memoirs of one of their readers, the rural preacher and Bible scholar Tomáš Juren (1750-1829), as well as the differences between the Christian confessions in their attitude to the emotions., Sixtus Bolom-Kotari., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy
The article analyses the terms ''value'' and ''explanation'' as used in ethical studies, offers a critique of this usage and an alternative, pragmatically oriented semantics of ethical terms, based on the illocutionary act of judging. The term ''value'' is supposed to describe a super-predicate common to both ethical and aesthetical value judgments. However, the traditional over-reliance on the copulative predication and the idea that language describes reality lead to a one-sided view of ethical terms, and a construction of sentences like ''The intentional torturing of little children is morally wrong'', whose pragmatic function, and consequently meaning, is very unclear. If, on the other hand, we take as our paradigm the act of judging (in the literal sense of a judge presiding over a case) we will be able to sketch a new, lighter ethics which, admittedly, falls short of the traditional demands placed on this discipline, but whose semantics is closer to the actual words used in expressing approval and disapproval., Článek analyzuje pojmy ,,hodnota'' a ,,vysvětlení'' používané v etických studiích, nabízí kritiku tohoto užití a alternativní, pragmaticky orientovanou sémantiku etických pojmů, založenou na iluminačním aktu soudnictví. Termín ,,hodnota'' má popisovat super-predikát společný jak pro etické, tak pro estetické hodnoty. Avšak tradiční přehnané spoléhání se na kopulační predikci a myšlenka, že jazyk popisuje realitu, vede k jednostrannému pohledu na etické pojmy a konstrukci vět jako ,,úmyslné mučení malých dětí je morálně špatné'', jehož pragmatická funkce a tudíž význam, je velmi nejasný. Pokud na druhou stranu vezmeme jako naše paradigma akt posuzování (v doslovném smyslu soudce předsedajícího případu), budeme schopni načrtnout novou, lehčí etiku,což, uznávám, nenaplňuje tradiční požadavky kladené na této disciplíny, ale jejichž sémantika je blíž ke skutečné slova používaná v projeví souhlas a nesouhlas., and Marek Tomeček
Th is article considers the relevance of the ideas of Soviet jurist Evgeny Pashukanis for debates about the relationship between Marxism and justice. In particular, it employs these ideas as a criticism of those who seek to supplement Marx’s critique of capitalism with liberal theories of justice, paradigmatically those of John Rawls. Pashukanis’s analysis of the legal form as a kind of fetish, arising on the basis of capitalist relations of production, opens up the possibility of a similar criticism of theories of justice. Th is involves more than just the familiar critique that such theories are ideological; Pashukanis suggests an approach that recognises the practical eff ectiveness of theories of justice while also recognising their limits from the perspective of radical critique. Th is new approach allows for a better understanding of how theories of justice might form part of radical theory and practice today.
Článek se pokouší v Lévinasově rané filosofii odhalit náznaky, v pozdní tvorbě již plně rozvinuté, etické koncepce bytí-pro-druhého. První texty, jež jsou stále do značné míry formované Heideggerovou fundamentální ontologií, staví do popředí fenomén neosobního bytí – ono je [il y a]. Ukážeme, že mimo čistě ontologický záběr můžeme v Lévinasově postulaci pojmu identifikovat intence jednak existenciální, jednak etické. Nálada hrůzy, vyvěrající ze zkušenosti subjektu s il y a, totiž vrhá individuální vědomí v existenciální otřes, jenž zpřístupňuje možnost etického obratu. Toto existenciálně-etické prizma v první řadě utváří ucelený narativ, spojující Lévinasovy rané ontologické úvahy s etickou koncepcí rozvinutou v pozdní tvorbě, zadruhé pak poukazuje na význačnou formativní funkci nálad v existenciální fenomenologii. Především nálada hrůzy se ukazuje jako způsob, jak negativně fundovat i motivovat etické smýšlení., The article attempts to discover, in Levinas’ early philosophy, the first indications of what by his later writings would become a fully developed, ethical conception of being-for-the other. The first texts, which were in large measure shaped by Heidegger’s fundamental ontology, place the phenomenon of impersonal being – il y a (there is) – into the forefront. We show that, besides a purely ontological view, we can in Levinas’ postulation of the concept identify intentions that are both existential and ethical. The mood of horror, resulting from the subject’s experience with il y a, throws individual consciousness into an existential upheaval, opening up the possibility for an ethical turn. This existential-ethical prism forms, first of all, a comprehensive narrative, combining Levinas’ early ontological thinking with the ethical concept that he developed in his late work and, secondly, points to a significant formative function of moods in existential phenomenology. Above all, the mood of horror is showing itself to be a way to negatively serve and motivate ethical attitudes., and Notre étude essaye découvrir des signes du concept éthique de l’être pour autrui contenus déjà dans la première philosophie de Lévinas mais pleinement développés ultérieurement. Les textes premiers, influencés considérablement par l’ontologie fondamentale de Heidegger, mettent en avance le phénomène de l’être impersonnel – il y a. Nous allons montrer qu’en dehors de prise proprement ontologique dans la formulation première de ce concept par Lévinas on peut y identifier les intentions à la fois existentielles et éthiques. L’ambiance de l’horreur provenant de l’expérience du sujet avec il y a ébranle existentiellement la conscience individuelle en l’ouvrant à la Kehre éthique. Ce regard éthico-existentiel formule en premier lieu un récit complet liant les premières réflexions ontologiques de Lévinas à un concept éthique développé dans son travail ultérieur, il attire attention ensuite à l’importante fonction formative des ambiances dans la phénoménologie existentielle. C’est en effet surtout l’ambiance de l’horreur qui se révèle en tant que moyen permettant une fondation et motivation négatives de la réflexion éthique.
The study focuses on theoretical analysis of selected controversies on social and cultural anthropology with a special attention to the
habitual practice in the
organization of field research In his study, the author relies on selected ethnological concepts and submits a thesis that intraspecific competition and territorial and predatory behaviour of researchers can become a source of controversies within the discipline. In the conclusion, the author compares anthropologists and ethnologists to headhunters who - at the “initiative ritual” of field research - acquire the reputation of those by whom they carried out ihe field research.