Deep Universal Dependencies is a collection of treebanks derived semi-automatically from Universal Dependencies (http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-3424). It contains additional deep-syntactic and semantic annotations. Version of Deep UD corresponds to the version of UD it is based on. Note however that some UD treebanks have been omitted from Deep UD.
Deep Universal Dependencies is a collection of treebanks derived semi-automatically from Universal Dependencies (http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-3687). It contains additional deep-syntactic and semantic annotations. Version of Deep UD corresponds to the version of UD it is based on. Note however that some UD treebanks have been omitted from Deep UD.
Texts in 107 languages from the W2C corpus (http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-097C-0000-0022-6133-9), first 1,000,000 tokens per language, tagged by the delexicalized tagger described in Yu et al. (2016, LREC, Portorož, Slovenia).
Texts in 107 languages from the W2C corpus (http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-097C-0000-0022-6133-9), first 1,000,000 tokens per language, tagged by the delexicalized tagger described in Yu et al. (2016, LREC, Portorož, Slovenia).
Changes in version 1.1:
1. Universal Dependencies tagset instead of the older and smaller Google Universal POS tagset.
2. SVM classifier trained on Universal Dependencies 1.2 instead of HamleDT 2.0.
3. Balto-Slavic languages, Germanic languages and Romance languages were tagged by classifier trained only on the respective group of languages. Other languages were tagged by a classifier trained on all available languages. The "c7" combination from version 1.0 is no longer used.
English-Slovak parallel corpus consisting of several freely available corpora (Acquis [1], Europarl [2], Official Journal of the European Union [3] and part of OPUS corpus [4] – EMEA, EUConst, KDE4 and PHP) and downloaded website of European Commission [5]. Corpus is published in both in plaintext format and with an automatic morphological annotation.
References:
[1] http://langtech.jrc.it/JRC-Acquis.html/
[2] http://www.statmt.org/europarl/
[3] http://apertium.eu/data
[4] http://opus.lingfil.uu.se/
[5] http://ec.europa.eu/ and This work has been supported by the grant Euro-MatrixPlus (FP7-ICT-2007-3-231720 of the EU and 7E09003 of the Czech Republic)
HamleDT 2.0 is a collection of 30 existing treebanks harmonized into a common annotation style, the Prague Dependencies, and further transformed into Stanford Dependencies, a treebank annotation style that became popular recently. We use the newest basic Universal Stanford Dependencies, without added language-specific subtypes.
Manual classification of errors of Czech-Slovak translation according to the classification introduced by Vilar et al. [1]. First 50 sentences from WMT 2010 test set were translated by 5 MT systems (Česílko, Česílko2, Google Translate and two Moses setups) and MT errors were manually marked and classified. Classification was applied in MT systems comparison [3]. Reference translation is included.
References:
[1] David Vilar, Jia Xu, Luis Fernando D’Haro and Hermann Ney. Error Analysis of Machine Translation Output. In International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 697-702. Genoa, Italy, May 2006.
[2] http://matrix.statmt.org/test_sets/list
[3] Ondřej Bojar, Petra Galuščáková, and Miroslav Týnovský. Evaluating Quality of Machine Translation from Czech to Slovak. In Markéta Lopatková, editor, Information Technologies - Applications and Theory, pages 3-9, September 2011 and This work has been supported by the grants Euro-MatrixPlus (FP7-ICT-2007-3-231720 of the EU and
7E09003 of the Czech Republic)
Manual classification of errors of English-Slovak translation according to the classification introduced by Vilar et al. [1]. 50 sentences randomly selected from WMT 2011 test set [2] were translated by 3 MT systems described in [3] and MT errors were manually marked and classified. Reference translation is included.
References:
[1] David Vilar, Jia Xu, Luis Fernando D’Haro and Hermann Ney. Error Analysis of Machine Translation Output. In International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 697-702. Genoa, Italy, May 2006.
[2] http://www.statmt.org/wmt11/evaluation-task.html
[3] Petra Galuščáková and Ondřej Bojar. Improving SMT by Using Parallel Data of a Closely Related Language. In Human Language Technologies - The Baltic Perspective - Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference Baltic HLT 2012, volume 247 of Frontiers in AI and Applications, pages 58-65, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 2012. IOS Press. and This work has been supported by the grant Euro-MatrixPlus (FP7-ICT-2007-3-231720 of the EU and
7E09003 of the Czech Republic)
Manually ranked outputs of Czech-Slovak translations. Three annotators manually ranked outputs of five MT systems (Česílko, Česílko2, Google Translate and two Moses setups) on three data sets (100 sentences randomly selected from books, 100 sentences randomly selected from Acquis corpus and 50 first sentences from WMT 2010 test set). Ranking was applied in MT systems comparison in [1].
References:
[1] Ondřej Bojar, Petra Galuščáková, and Miroslav Týnovský. Evaluating Quality of Machine Translation from Czech to Slovak. In Markéta Lopatková, editor, Information Technologies - Applications and Theory, pages 3-9, September 2011 and This work has been supported by the grant Euro-MatrixPlus (FP7-ICT-2007-3-231720 of the EU and
7E09003 of the Czech Republic)
Slovak morphological dictionary modeled after the Czech one. It consists of (word form, lemma, POS tag) triples, reusing the Czech morphological system for POS tags and lemma descriptions.