The concept of "Exclusivism" is considered to represent one of the most characteristic features of International Nuclear Law. This concept is reflected by regulating matters of uses of nuclear energy and ionising radiation exclusively by distinct principles, that govern legal relations arising in these matters. The concept of "Exclusivism" has been widely reflected in the provisions of international conventions, which have been adopted since the 1960s. This article aims to revisit this concept, taking the most recent developments in international and European law into regard. The article is dealing with the reasons and origins of the concept of "Exclusivism" in International Nuclear Law, with reflections of this concept in existing international treaties and at last but not at least, with most recent tendencies, that aim at jeopardising this concept., Jakub Handrlica., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy
The cyber sphere forms a fifth domain of activities were interactions between state and non-state actors could happen. It starts to play an important role within the conflicts and hostilities. Especially in these situations, international society does not have a unified view on the question how to deal with the activities in cyberspace. We could see the different forms of abuse of cyberspace also within the crisis in Ukraine. This crisis is a good example of the complexity of the legal approach and the (non)capability of the legal understanding of cyber operations and attacks. The goal of this article is to highlight this complexity and to determine the status of cyber incidents realized in the Ukraine from the perspective of international law., Jozef Valuch, Ondrej Hamuľák., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy
Anti-suit injunctions are rather unknown in the civil law legal system of the Czech Repbulic. The policy reasons for the rejection of anti-suit injunctions in the Czech Republic are rooted in the constitutional right of every person to assert, through the legally prescribed procedure, their rights before an independent and impartial court or, in specified cases, before another body. In other words, every person may commence proceedings before a competent court, or respectively before any court or another body (e.g. like an arbitral tribunal, etc.), which is then exclusively empowered to rule on its jurisdiction. Therefore, there is also no distinction between anti-suit injunctions in domestic and international litigation. Czech law does not have any alternative procedural or substantive devices that may have similar functions as anti-suit injunctions related to arbitration. It means that it is not possible to obtain a court order against a respondent prohibiting the respondent from commencing or continuing court proceedings in another forum in violation of an arbitration agreement., Alexander J. Bělohlávek., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy
This paper examines the possibility and the desirability of axiomatization in law. In the first part, the paper examines the notion of axiom and the ways how it was or could be introduced into law. It is here where the authors openly invite the reader to lose the conventional approach and think about alternative ways to build basic legal concepts. In the second part, the paper continues by presenting several theories which endeavored (or appeared to endeavor) to show that law can (and should be) axiomatized and which even attempted to axiomatize it. After establishing whether these theories were successful at all, the authors add some of their own ideas on the topic of axiomatization., Martin Madej, Filip Horák., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy
A: Belehrung, Prag, am 13. juli 1831, [2] s. -- B: Belehrung, wornach der an der asiatischen Brechruhr (Cholera morbus) Erkrankende und dessen Umgebung vor Ankunft des Arztes sich zu verhalten hat, Prag, im August 1831, [2] s. -- B: Ponaučenj, co magj činiti, kdož na azyatyckau choleru se rozstonali, y ti, kdož okolo nemocných těchtio gsau, W Praze w měsýcy srpnu 1831, [2] s. -- C. Instrukzion für die Ortsobrigkeiten im Königreiche Böhmen vor und nach dem Ausbruche der Brechruhr (Cholera morbus), Prag, am 14. Juli 1831, [3] s. -- D: Instrukzion für die politischen Kommissäre, und für die denselben zugewiesene Aerzte, welche von den k. Kreisämtern in Ortschaften abgesendet werden, wo der Ausbruch der asiatischen Brechruhr vermuthet wird, oder wirklich eingetreten ist, Prag, am 14.Juli 1831, [4] s. -- E. Belehrung für Aerzte und Wundärzte, wie sie sich und Andere von ansteckenden Krankheiten zu verwahren haben, und wie die Reinigung der verdächtigen Wonhungen und Sachen einzuleiten und vorzunehmen ist, Prag, im juli 1831, [4] s.