Recenzent rekapituluje historické publikace věnované od roku 1990 Filozofické fakultě Univerzity Karlovy v Praze v době komunistického režimu (1948-1989) a hodnotí Petráňovu rozsahem impozantní knihu jako završení dosavadního výzkumu. Podle něj si autor klade podstatné obecné otázky po důvodech snadného přijetí a dlouhodobého trvání komunistického režimu, rezignace společnosti a izolovanosti disentu za takzvané normalizace, domnívá se ale, že přesvědčivějším odpovědím na ně brání částečné zatížení výkladu „totalitárněhistorickým narativem“, stavícím do protikladu vládnoucí režim a společnost. Oceňuje, že profesor Josef Petráň (1930-2017) jako historik raného novověku, který již od šedesátých let přednášel na pražské filozofické fakultě, propojuje líčení její historie s vlastním příběhem v žánru ego-histoire, nevyhýbá se přitom problematickým momentům a neusiluje o sebeobhajobu. Hlavní teze, v níž Petráň částečně rehabilituje kvalitu odborné produkce Filozofické fakulty UK v komunistickém období, je podle něj podložená a největší přínos knihy vidí v mimořádně bohaté faktografii., The reviewer recaps historical publications since 1990 deducated to the Faculty of Arts of the Charles University in Prague at the time of the Communist regime (1948-1989), assessing Petráň´s impressive book Philosophers making a revolution: Faculty of Arts of the Charles University in Prague during the Communist experiment (1948-1968-1989) as the climax of the author´s research efforts so far. In his opinion, the author is asking himself essential general questions concerning the reasons of easy acceptance and long-term existence of the Commmunist regime, resignation of the society, and isolated nature of the dissent during the so-called normalization; however, he argues the author´s answers could have been more convincing if the book had not been partly burdened by the "totalitarian historical narrative" presenting the ruling regime and the society as opposite entities. He appreciates that Professor Petráň (1930-2017) as an early modern era historian lecturing at the Faculty of Arts in Prague since the 1960s, connects the portrayal of its history with his own ego-histoire story while not avoiding questionable moments and not attempting to defend himself. The main principle of the book, namely Petráň´s partial rehabilitation of the quality of professional production of the Faculty of Arts at the time of the Communist regime, is, in the reviewer´s opinion, substantiated, and the reviewer sees the book greatest contribution in its exceptionally rich factography., [autor recenze] Petr Andreas., and Obsahuje bibliografii a bibliografické odkazy
Prague Spring was a period of political liberalization in Czechoslovakia during the era of its Soviet domination after World War II. It began on January 5, when reformist Alexander Dubček came to power, and continued until August 21, when the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact allies invaded this country to halt the reforms. The Prague Spring reforms were an attempt by Dubček to grant additional rights to citizens as a part of his partial decentralization of the economy and democratization. and Jitka Vondrová.
The paper deals with the stories representing the suicide of Prague (German writing) authors, Christian Heinrich Spieß, Johann Friedrich Ernst Albrecht and Reactions to the Wertheriads, which document the divergent development of cutures of subjectivity (Reckwitz) in Central Europe in the age of Enlightenment. The first part of the paper reconstructs the influence of the radical preromantism and Sturm und Drang, namely The Sorrows of Young Werther in the Bohemian Lands. Next, It compares the Stories written by Spieß and Albrecht with Werther as a paradigmatic text and its model of Subjectivity. It focuses to the Story Die neue Sapfo written by Spieß in 1779, which documents the genesis of his later stories and the development of the conception of the role of the subject., Václav Smyčka., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy
The author presents the preliminary results of the excavation of the Mikulčice acropolis fortifi cation near Church II. Any rampart is the largest such structure built by the Mojmír dynasty. The importance of this particular fortifi cation lies in the fact that it is the rampart of the main area of one of the top Great Moravian centers of power that protected, among other things, a number of religious buildings and a district with the only properly documented stone palace of a Great Moravian ruler. Great Moravian rampart is composed of a stone face wall, clay-wood core strengthened by grates and a stone substructure ringed by stake palisades, in front of, and in some places partially under, the face wall. The substructure’s role was most likely to bear the face wall’s weight and to strengthen the artifi cial slope under it against water erosion by the nearby river. The conclusion poses the main issues and unknowns that remain to be discovered and answered about the Mikulčice fortifi cation, Marian Mazuch., and Obsahuje seznam literatury
The article maps a numerically limited and religiously and socially discriminated group of pre‐tolerance and tolerance non‐Catholics, thus a group of persons of restricted education, which was except some rare examples limited to the basic level. In this regard, the text offers a more compendious analysis of one confessional and social group that was most of the time just a restricted recipient of the enlightened ideas and education spread by so‐called "plebeian" intelligence and most of all by new protestant preachers. This group showed however a great ability to absorb, transform, create and spread within their community the adopted and own thoughts, the fact that significantly contributed to their emancipation in the following period., Eva Hajdinová., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy
Článek obsahuje přehled výzkumů z období paleolitu, mezolitu, neolitu, eneolitu, doby bronzové, doby železné, doby římské a doby stěhování národů, středověku a novověku.
Článek obsahuje přehled výzkumů z období paleolitu, neolitu, eneolitu, doby bronzové, doby železné, doby římské a doby stěhování národů, středověku a novověku.
Článek obsahuje přehled výzkumů z období paleolitu, mezolitu, neolitu, eneolitu, doby bronzové, doby železné, doby římské a doby stěhování národů., Overwiew of excavations in Moravia and Silesia 2010 = Übersicht den Grabungen in Mähren und Schlesien 2010 /., and Obsahuje seznam literatury