a1_Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in conjunction with synchronized spirometry we an alyzed and compared diaphragm movement during tidal breathing and voluntary movement of the diaphragm while breath holding. Breathing cycles of 16 healthy subjects were examined using a dynamic sequence (77 slices in sagittal plane during 20 s, 1NSA, 240x256, TR4.48, TE2.24, FA90, TSE1, FOV 328). The amplitude of movement of the apex and dorsal costophren ic angle of the diaphragm were measured for two test conditions: tidal breathing and voluntary breath holding. The maximal inferior and superior positions of the diaphragm were subtracted from the corresponding positions during voluntary movements while breath holding. The average amplitude of inferio-superior mo vement of the diaphragm apex during tidal breathing was 27.3±10.2 mm (mean ± SD), and during voluntary movement while breath holding was 32.5±16.2 mm. Movement of the costophrenic angle was 39±17.6 mm during tidal breathing and 45.5±21.2 mm during voluntary movement while breath holding. The inferior position of the diaphragm was lower in 11 of 16 subjects (68.75 %) and identical in 2 of 16 (12.5 %) subj ects during voluntary movement compared to the breath holding. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to demonstrate that movement of the costophrenic angle and apex of the diaphragm ha d a linear relationship in both examined situations (r=0.876). A correlation was found between the amplitude of diaphragm movement during tidal breathing and lung volume (r=0.876). The amplitude of movement of the diaphragm with or without breathing showed no correlation to each other (r=0.074). The moveme nt during tidal breathing shows a correlation with the changes in lung volumes. Dynamic MRI demonstrated that individuals are capable of moving their diaphragm voluntarily, but the amplitude of movement differs from person to person., a2_In this study, the movements of the diaphragm apex and the costophr enic angle were synchronous during voluntary movement of the diaphragm while breath holding. Although the sample is small, this study confirms that the function of the diaphragm is not only respiratory but also postural and can be voluntarily controlled., P. Kolář, J. Neuwirth, J. Šanda, V. Suchánek, Z. Svatá, J. Volejník, M. Pivec., and Obsahuje bibliografii
The physiological control system of the heart produces a highly complex pattern of cardiac rhythmicity which is reflected in the variability of heart rate. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of posture and breathing frequency on the cardiac control system by various noninvasive techniques. Seven healthy subjects (24 ±5 years, mean age ± S.D.) were studied in the supine and sitting positions while breathing spontaneously or at a fixed rate (3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 60 breaths.min-1). Time series of instantaneous beat-to-beat heart rates were evaluated by spectral analysis and by the dimensionless approximate entropy parameter. The total spectral power as well as the low (<0.05 Hz) and mid frequency (0.05-0.12 Hz) spectral components were higher in the sitting position. Mean approximate entropy (± S.D.) (0.85 ±0.15 in sitting and 0.87±0.16 in lying subjects) was unaffected by postural changes or breathing frequencies higher than 6 breaths.min-1. Analysis in the frequency domain revealed that the activity of the autonomic components controlling heart rate was modified by ventilation and postural changes, whereas approximate entropy, a unique measure of the complexity and integrity of the cardiac control system, was almost unaffected by respiration and posture.
The influence of posture on the rhythms in blood pressure, heart rate and respiration was tested by means of spectral analysis in 14 healthy subjects. During squatting, standing and sitting, the finger blood pressure was recorded by the non- invasive Pefiaz technique together with cardiac intervals and respiratory movements. The power spectra obtained from five-minute samples showed that the respiratory components of cardiac interval and pulse pressure were reduced significantly in standing. Compared to squatting, a significant increase of total power in the medium frequency band (0.05-0.15 Hz) for cardiac interval, diastolic and mean pressure could be detected.
Despite abundant knowledge about the relationship between body size (i.e., body mass, lower limb length) and limb posture during locomotion on the level of interspecies variability, little is known about variation on the intraspecific level. We used an experimental approach to evaluate the relationship between body size and knee posture during walking in humans at specific gait events and at each percentage point of normalized stance phase. We detected significant negative correlation between knee flexion angle and body mass at the second peak of the vertical ground reaction force, but, in contrast to a previous study, we found no significant relationship between knee flexion angle and lower limb length. Although not significant, strengthened correlations between knee flexion angle and lower limb length were detected at late stance phase and these coincide well with the strengthened correlations between knee flexion angle and body mass. Our findings support the view that body size influences limb posture during locomotion even on the intraspecific level. In humans, larger individuals tend to use more extended knee postures in late stance of walking than do smaller individuals.
To investigate the vestibular and somatosensory interaction in human postural control, a galvanic vestibular stimulation of cosine bell shape resulting in a small forward or backward body lean was paired with three vibrations of both soleus muscles. The induced body lean was registered by the position of the center of foot pressure (CoP). During a quiet stance with eyes closed the vibration of both soleus muscles with frequency (of) 40 Hz, 60 Hz and 80 Hz resulted in the body lean backward with velocities related to the vibration frequencies. The vestibular galvanic stimulation with the head turned to the right caused forward or backward modification of CoP backward response to the soleus muscles vibration and peaked at 1.5-2 s following the onset of the vibration. The effect of the paired stimulation was larger than the summation of the vestibular stimulation during the quiet stance and a leg muscle vibration alone. The enhancement of the galvanic stimulation was related to the velocity of body lean induced by the leg muscle vibration. The galvanic vestibular stimulation during a faster body movement had larger effects than during a slow body lean or the quiet stance. The results suggest that velocity of a body postural movement or incoming proprioceptive signal from postural muscles potentiate the effects of simultaneous vestibular stimulations on posture., O. Dzurková, F. Hlavačka., and Obsahuje bibliografii a bibliografické odkazy