Hodnocení a sledování průběhu veřejně politických opatření (včetně politiky podpory zdraví) je, zejména v rámci diskurzu na poli veřejné politiky jako vědní disciplíny, chápáno jako nedílná součást tvorby a realizace veřejné politiky, která by měla přispívat k naplňování demokratických principů ve veřejné správě. Vlastní evaluační praxe, a tedy i konečný smysl hodnocení, se však může značně lišit od odborných akademických metodologických doporučení a deklarací v rámci strategických veřejně politických dokumentů. Cílem předkládaného článku je na základě systematické rešerše vytvořit teoretický rámec pro exploraci a porozumění evaluační praxi v politice podpory zdraví na národní úrovni (včetně podmínek, které na ni mohou působit) a představit zjištění některých zahraničních autorů, kteří zkoumali jednotlivé případy evaluační praxe., Public policy (including health promotion policy) evaluation and monitoring is considered, especially in the discourse on the ground of public policy as an academic discipline, to be an integral part of public policy creation and implementation, which should contribute to promotion of democratic principles in public administration. The particular evaluation practice and hence the very meaning of evaluation, may differ greatly from academic methodological recommendations and declarations included in strategic public policy documents. The aim of the article is to create a theoretical framework which can be used for exploration and understanding of evaluation practice in the health promotion policy at the national level (including various conditions which can influence the evaluation practice) and introduce some of the findings of authors dealing with particular cases of evaluation practice., and Eva Tušková
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FDP in patients with ocular ischemic syndrome. Material and methods. The material for this study is based on results of a comprehensive examination and treatment of 53 patients with a diagnosis OIS. The average age of the patients was 57,8 ± 6,82 year. 19 of them women, 34 men. 27 patients entered to the main group (1) which received standard therapy in combination with intravenous FDP (fructose 1,6-bisphosphate). 26 patients in the control group (2) received standard treatment. Results. In applying the FDP combined with comprehensive therapy in the main group resulted in increased of visual acuity by 32.8%, parameters of retinal sensitivity by 17.8%, reducing the area of scotomas compared with patients of the control group. Optical coherence tomography registered significant changes in the dynamics in patients of the main group - reducing the edema and restoration of RNFL and ONH. Recovery of visual function may have contributed neuroprotective activity of the drug FDP by a protective effect on nerve tissue, reducing the effects of hypoxic stress. Conclusions. The use of standard therapy in combination with FDP in the treatment of ocular ischemic syndrome has a positive effect on the course of the disease, thereby, increase of visual acuity, a decrease in sectoral loss in vision fields, the positive dynamics OCT parameters, improving hemodynamic parameters at Doppler imaging in dynamics., Dilbar Makhkamova, and Literatura
Few studies concerning the occurrence of cow’s milk allergy with the use of double-blind, placebo controlled food challenge test in adolescents and adult patients suffering from atopic dermatitis exist. Aim: To evaluate the occurrence of cow’s milk allergy in adolescents and adults suffering from atopic dermatitis. Method: Altogether 179 persons suffering from atopic dermatitis were included in the study: 51 men and 128 women entered the study with the average age of 26.2 (s.d. 9.5 years). Complete dermatological and allergological examinations were performed. Results: The positive results in specificIgE and in skin prick tests were recorded in 12% of patients. According to the open exposure tests and double-blind, placebo controlled food challenge tests these patients are only sensitized to cow’s milk without clinical symptoms of allergy. Double-blind, placebo controlled food challenge test confirmed food allergy to cow milk only in one patient (worsening of atopic dermatitis), the oral allergy syndrome was observed in another one patient, occurrence of this allergy was altogether 1.1%. Conclusion: Cow’s milk allergy rarely plays a role in the worsening of atopic dermatitis in adolescent and adult patients., Jarmila Čelakovská, Květuše Ettlerová, Karel Ettler, Jaroslava Vaněčková, Josef Bukač, and Literatura 29
INTRODUCTION: A previous study has employed shear-wave ultrasound elastographic imaging to assess corneal rigidity in an ex-vivo porcine eye model. This study employs the same modality in vivo in a rabbit eye model in order to assess lens, ciliary body and total ocular rigidity changes following the instillation of atropine and pilocarpine. METHODS: Ten non-pigmented female rabbits were examined. Measurements of the lens, ciliary body and total ocular rigidity as well as lens thickness and anterior chamber depth were taken with the Aixplorer system (SuperSonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France) with the SuperLinear™ SL 15-4 transducer in both eyes at baseline as well as after pilocarpine and atropine instillation. The IOP was also measured with the TonoPen tonometer. RESULTS: Changes in rigidity in the examined areas following atropine instillation were statistically not significant. Ciliary body rigidity was significantly increased whereas lens and total ocular rigidity were significantly reduced following pilocarpine instillation. The decrease in lens rigidity following pilocarpine was significantly associated with the respective increase in ciliary body rigidity. CONCLUSIONS: Shear-wave ultrasound elastography can detect in vivo rigidity changes in the anterior segment of the rabbit eye model and may potentially be applied in human eyes, providing useful clinical information on conditions in which rigidity changes play an important role, such as glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation syndrome or presbyopia. and E. T. Detorakis, E. E. Drakonaki, H. Ginis, N. Karyotakis, I. G. Pallikaris
Motivation Until recently it was considered that 65 years is cutoff for defining patients as elderly, but newer reports indicate that this age limit shift to 70 years of age. Elderly patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer, associated comorbidities and poor performance status represent a specific population and a challenge for use of chemotherapy. Primary aim was to evaluate the impact of mono therapy with oral etoposide on overall survival in elderly patients (≥ 70 years of age) with advanced non small cell lung cancer and poor performance status (PS) ≥ 2 (clinical stage IIIb and IV ), and as well to evaluate tolerability of this therapy. Secondary aim was to evaluate response rate. Methods Retrospectively, medical records of 79 female and male patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer and poor performance status treated with oral etoposide (2x25 mg 20 days/10 days pause) in period from 2007 till 2010 were checked for relevant data. Data regarding demographics, performance status, overall survival, response rates and drug toxicity were collected. For statistical analysis we used Pearson chi-square test, T-test, Kaplan-Meier product limited method and Cox regression. Results Median overall survival (OS) was 31 weeks, in patients with PS 2 overall survival was 34 weeks, and in group with PS 3 was only 24 weeks. Partial response was registered in 20.2% of patients, stable disease in 41.85 % and disease progression in 38% of patients. Treatment was well tolerated, febrile neutropenia and toxic deaths were not registered. Toxic effects didn't have statistically significant influence on OS. Conclusion Oral etoposide used as mono therapy has been shown as moderate effective and very safe in treating elderly patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer and poor performance status so it represents a good therapy option for treating this specific population., Zoran Andrić, Vladimir Kovčin, Slobodanka Crevar, Zafir Murtezani, Sanja Kostić, and Literatura
Přestože jsou publikovány některé zkušenosti s podáváním amikacinu jednou denně u dospělých a dětí, není dosud doloženo, zda je podávání aminoglykosidů jednou denně bezpečné u starších pacientů. Podávání aminoglykosidových antibiotik jednou denně je sice pohodlnější a pravděpodobně i nákladově efektivnější, avšak u starších pacientů je možné riziko kumulativní toxicity. Toto riziko může být zvýšeno obzvláště při současném užívání dalších nefrotoxických látek. Přes toto riziko je podávání aminoglykosidů jednou denně u starších pacientů běžné a jeho důsledky nejsou dosud známy. Uvádíme případ sedmdesátiletého muže, u kterého byly zjištěny extrémně toxické hladiny amikacinu při dávkování jednou denně (1 g/denně v 30minutové infuzi) spolu se zhoršením renálních funkcí., Although some experience with single daily doses of amikacin in adults and children has been reported, to date there is no clear evidence whether the once-daily regime of aminoglycosides is safe to be administered to elderly patients. Despite the convenience and potential cost-effectiveness of once-daily administration of aminoglycoside antibiotics, there is concern over the potential cumulative toxicity associated with their use in elderly patients. This may be particularly relevant where there is concomitant use of other nephrotoxic agents. However, despite these concerns, the use of once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides is common in elderly patients and the consequences are unquantified. We present a case of 70 years old male patient, who developed extremely toxic levels of amikacin on a once-daily regime (1 g/day in 30 min. infusion) with clear evidence of renal function impairment., Tesfaye Hundie, B. Jedličková, Richard Průša, and Lit. 25