The Court of Justice of the European Union in the post-Lisbon era: impact of the ´Treaty of Lisbon on the EU judicature since its entry into force

Title:

The Court of Justice of the European Union in the post-Lisbon era: impact of the ´Treaty of Lisbon on the EU judicature since its entry into force

Creator:

Petrlík, David

Identifier:

https://cdk.lib.cas.cz/client/handle/uuid:fc9d1c47-333a-4def-9607-42e19962f68f
uuid:fc9d1c47-333a-4def-9607-42e19962f68f

Subject:

European union, Court of Justice, General Court, Treaty of Lisbon, proceedings, action for annulment, reference for a preliminary ruling, urgent preliminary ruling procedure, area of freedom, security and justice, regulatory acts, action brought by national Parliament for infringement of the principle of subsidiarity, nomination of members of the EU courts, change of philosophy of judicial review, and accession to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Type:

article, model:article, and TEXT

Description:

The Treaty of Lisbon has introduced several modifications concerning the EU courts that have already had a significant impact on their activity. The most important one is the possibility for all national courts to address to the Court of Justice references for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation and validity of acts of the Area of freedom, security and justice. A similar impact can be attributed to the possibility for natural and legal persons to contest regulatory acts which are of direct concern to them. However, the Treaty of Lisbon has also introduced modifications that have not had any significant impact on the activity of the EU courts. This is the case, for example, for the provisions on actions brought by national Parliaments for infringement of the principle of subsudiarity or the provisions on direct actions in the Area of freedom, security and justice.

Language:

English

Rights:

http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
policy:public

Source:

The lawyer quarterly: international journal for legal research | 2012 Volume:2 | Number:3

Harvested from:

CDK

Metadata only:

false