The correlation between baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and the spectrum component at a frequency of 0.1 Hz of pulse intervals (PI) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) was studied. SBP and PI of 51 subjects were recorded beat-to-beat at rest (3 min), during exercise (0.5 W/kg of body weight, 9 min), and at rest (6 min) after exercise. BRS was determined by a spectral method (a modified alpha index technique). The subjects were divided into groups according to the spectral amplitude of SBP at a frequency of 0.1 Hz. The following limits of amplitude (in mm Hg) were used: very high ≥ 5.4 (VH); high 5.4 > H ≥ 3 (H); medium 3 > M ≥ 2 (M), low < 2 (L). We analyzed the relationships between 0.1 Hz variability in PI and BRS at rest, during the exercise and during recovery in subgroups VH, H, M, L. The 0.1 Hz variability of PI increased significantly with increasing BRS in each of the groups with identical 0.1 Hz variability in SBP. This relationship was shifted to the lower values of PI variability at the same BRS with a decrease in SBP variability. The primary SBP variability increased during exercise. The interrelationship between the variability of SBP, PI and BRS was identical at rest and during exercise. A causal interrelationship between the 0.1 Hz variability of SBP and PI, and BRS was shown. During exercise, the increasing primary variability in SBP due to sympathetic activation was present, but it did not change the relationship between variability in pulse intervals and BRS., N. Honzíková, A. Krtička, Z. Nováková, E. Závodná., and Obsahuje bibliografii
Decreased baroreflex sensitivity is an early sign of autonomic dysfunction in patients with type-1 diabetes mellitus. We evaluated the repeatability of a mild baroreflex sensitivity decrease in diabetics with respect to their heart rate. Finger blood pressure was continuously recorded in 14 young diabetics without clinical signs of autonomic dysfunction and in 14 age-matched controls for 42 min. The recordings were divided into 3-min segments, and the mean inter-beat interval (IBI), baroreflex sensitivity in ms/mm Hg (BRS) and mHz/mm Hg (BRSf) were determined in each segment. These values fluctuated in each subject within 42 min and therefore coefficients of repeatability were calculated for all subjects. Diabetics compared with controls had a decreased mean BRS (p=0.05), a tendency to a shortened IBI (p=0.08), and a decreased BRSf (p=0.17). IBI correlated with BRS in diabetics (p=0.03); th is correlation was at p=0.12 in the controls. BRSf was IBI independent (controls: p=0.81, diabetics: p=0.29). We conclude that BRS is partially dependent on mean IBI. Thus, BRS reflects not only an impairment of the quick baroreflex responses of IBI to blood pressure changes, but also a change of the tonic sy mpathetic and pa rasympathetic heart rate control. This is of significance during mild changes of BRS. Therefore, an examination of the BRSf index is highly recommended, because this examin ation improves the diagnostic value of the measurement, particul arly in cases of early signs of autonomic dysfunction., J. Svačinová ... [et al.]., and Obsahuje bibliografii a bibliografické odkazy
In this study we tested whether joint evaluation of the frequency (fcs) at which maxima of power in the cross-spectra between the variability in systolic blood pressure and inter-beat intervals in the range of 0.06-0.12 Hz occur together with the quantification of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) may improve early detection of autonomic dysfunction in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). We measured 14 T1DM patients (age 20.3-24.2 years, DM duration 10.4-14.2 years, without any signs of autonomic neuropathy) and 14 age-matched controls (Co). Finger arterial blood pressure was continuously recorded by Finapres for one hour. BRS and fcs were determined by the spectral method. Receiver-operating curves (ROC) were calculated for fcs, BRS, and a combination of both factors determined as F(z)=1/(1+exp(-z)), z=3.09–0.013*BRS– 0.027*fcs. T1DM had significantly lower fcs than Co (T1DM: 88.8±6.7 vs. Co: 93.7±3.8 mHz; p<0.05), and a tendency towards lower BRS compared to Co (T1DM: 10.3±4.4 vs. Co: 14.6±7.1 ms/mm Hg; p=0.06). The ROC for Fz showed the highest sensitivity and specificity (71.4 % and 71.4 %) in comparison with BRS (64.3 % and 71.4 %) or fcs (64.3 % and 64.3 %). The presented method of evaluation of BRS and fcs forming an integrated factor Fz could provide further improvement in the risk stratification of diabetic patients., N. Honzíková ... [et al.]., and Obsahuje seznam literatury