Systolic blood pressure (SBP) changes control the cardiac interbeat intervals (IBI) duration via baroreflex. Conversely, SBP is influenced by IBI via non- baroreflex mechanisms. Both causal pathways (feedback - baroreflex and feedforward - non- baroreflex) form a closed loop of the SBP- IBI interaction. The aim of this study was to assess the age -related changes in the IBI - SBP interaction. We have non -invasively recorded resting beat -to- beat SBP and IBI in 335 healthy subjects of different age, ranging from 11 to 23 years. Using a linear autoregressive bivariate model we obtained gain (Gain SBP,IBI, used traditionally as baroreflex sensitivity) and coherence (CohSBP,IBI) of the SBP-IBI interaction and causal gain and coherence in baroreflex (Gain SBP → IBI , Coh SBP → IBI ) and coherence in non- baroreflex (CohIBI→SBP) directions separately. A non -linear approach was used for causal coupling indices evaluation (C SBP → IBI , C IBI → SBP ) quantifying the amount of information transferred between signals. We performed a correlation to age analysis of a ll measures. CohIBI→SBP and CIBI→SBP were higher than CohSBP→IBI and CSBP→IBI, respectively. Gain SBP,IBI increased and Coh SBP → IBI decreased with age. The coupling indices did not correlate with age. We conclude that the feedforward influence dominated at rest. The increase of Gain SBP,IBI with age was not found in the closed loop model. A decrease of Coh SBP → IBI could be related to a change in the cardiovascular control system complexity during maturation., J. Svačinová, M. Javorka, Z. Nováková, E. Závodná, B. Czippelová, N. Honzíková., and Obsahuje bibliografii
Decreased baroreflex sensitivity is an early sign of autonomic dysfunction in patients with type-1 diabetes mellitus. We evaluated the repeatability of a mild baroreflex sensitivity decrease in diabetics with respect to their heart rate. Finger blood pressure was continuously recorded in 14 young diabetics without clinical signs of autonomic dysfunction and in 14 age-matched controls for 42 min. The recordings were divided into 3-min segments, and the mean inter-beat interval (IBI), baroreflex sensitivity in ms/mm Hg (BRS) and mHz/mm Hg (BRSf) were determined in each segment. These values fluctuated in each subject within 42 min and therefore coefficients of repeatability were calculated for all subjects. Diabetics compared with controls had a decreased mean BRS (p=0.05), a tendency to a shortened IBI (p=0.08), and a decreased BRSf (p=0.17). IBI correlated with BRS in diabetics (p=0.03); th is correlation was at p=0.12 in the controls. BRSf was IBI independent (controls: p=0.81, diabetics: p=0.29). We conclude that BRS is partially dependent on mean IBI. Thus, BRS reflects not only an impairment of the quick baroreflex responses of IBI to blood pressure changes, but also a change of the tonic sy mpathetic and pa rasympathetic heart rate control. This is of significance during mild changes of BRS. Therefore, an examination of the BRSf index is highly recommended, because this examin ation improves the diagnostic value of the measurement, particul arly in cases of early signs of autonomic dysfunction., J. Svačinová ... [et al.]., and Obsahuje bibliografii a bibliografické odkazy
In this study we tested whether joint evaluation of the frequency (fcs) at which maxima of power in the cross-spectra between the variability in systolic blood pressure and inter-beat intervals in the range of 0.06-0.12 Hz occur together with the quantification of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) may improve early detection of autonomic dysfunction in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). We measured 14 T1DM patients (age 20.3-24.2 years, DM duration 10.4-14.2 years, without any signs of autonomic neuropathy) and 14 age-matched controls (Co). Finger arterial blood pressure was continuously recorded by Finapres for one hour. BRS and fcs were determined by the spectral method. Receiver-operating curves (ROC) were calculated for fcs, BRS, and a combination of both factors determined as F(z)=1/(1+exp(-z)), z=3.09–0.013*BRS– 0.027*fcs. T1DM had significantly lower fcs than Co (T1DM: 88.8±6.7 vs. Co: 93.7±3.8 mHz; p<0.05), and a tendency towards lower BRS compared to Co (T1DM: 10.3±4.4 vs. Co: 14.6±7.1 ms/mm Hg; p=0.06). The ROC for Fz showed the highest sensitivity and specificity (71.4 % and 71.4 %) in comparison with BRS (64.3 % and 71.4 %) or fcs (64.3 % and 64.3 %). The presented method of evaluation of BRS and fcs forming an integrated factor Fz could provide further improvement in the risk stratification of diabetic patients., N. Honzíková ... [et al.]., and Obsahuje seznam literatury