English model for NameTag, a named entity recognition tool. The model is trained on CoNLL-2003 training data. Recognizes PER, ORG, LOC and MISC named entities. Achieves F-measure 84.73 on CoNLL-2003 test data.
English models for MorphoDiTa, providing morphological analysis, morphological generation and part-of-speech tagging.
The morphological dictionary is created from Morphium and SCOWL (Spell Checker Oriented Word Lists), the PoS tagger is trained on WSJ (Wall Street Journal). and This work has been using language resources developed and/or stored and/or distributed by the LINDAT/CLARIN project of the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic (project LM2010013).
The morphological POS analyzer development was supported by grant of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic No. LC536 "Center for Computational Linguistics". The morphological POS analyzer research was performed by Johanka Spoustová (Spoustová 2008; the Treex::Tool::EnglishMorpho::Analysis Perl module). The lemmatizer was implemented by Martin Popel (Popel 2009; the Treex::Tool::EnglishMorpho::Lemmatizer Perl module). The lemmatizer is based on morpha, which was released under LGPL licence as a part of RASP system (http://ilexir.co.uk/applications/rasp).
The tagger algorithm and feature set research was supported by the projects MSM0021620838 and LC536 of Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, GA405/09/0278 of the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic and 1ET101120503 of Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. The research was performed by Drahomíra "johanka" Spoustová, Jan Hajič, Jan Raab and Miroslav Spousta.
NER models for NameTag 2, named entity recognition tool, for English, German, Dutch, Spanish and Czech. Model documentation including performance can be found here: https://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/nametag/2/models . These models are for NameTag 2, named entity recognition tool, which can be found here: https://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/nametag/2 .
NER models for NameTag 2, named entity recognition tool, for English, German, Dutch, Spanish and Czech. Model documentation including performance can be found here: https://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/nametag/2/models . These models are for NameTag 2, named entity recognition tool, which can be found here: https://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/nametag/2 .
UDPipe is an trainable pipeline for tokenization, tagging, lemmatization and dependency parsing of CoNLL-U files. UDPipe is language-agnostic and can be trained given only annotated data in CoNLL-U format. Trained models are provided for nearly all UD treebanks. UDPipe is available as a binary, as a library for C++, Python, Perl, Java, C#, and as a web service.
UDPipe is a free software under Mozilla Public License 2.0 (http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/) and the linguistic models are free for non-commercial use and distributed under CC BY-NC-SA (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) license, although for some models the original data used to create the model may impose additional licensing conditions. UDPipe is versioned using Semantic Versioning (http://semver.org/).
UDPipe website http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/udpipe contains download links of both the released packages and trained models, hosts documentation and offers online demo.
UDPipe development repository http://github.com/ufal/udpipe is hosted on GitHub.
Tokenizer, POS Tagger, Lemmatizer and Parser models for all 50 languages of Universal Depenencies 2.0 Treebanks, created solely using UD 2.0 data (http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-1983). The model documentation including performance can be found at http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/udpipe/users-manual#universal_dependencies_20_models .
To use these models, you need UDPipe binary version at least 1.2, which you can download from http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/udpipe .
In addition to models itself, all additional data and value of hyperparameters used for training are available in the second archive, allowing reproducible training.
Tokenizer, POS Tagger, Lemmatizer and Parser models for 90 treebanks of 60 languages of Universal Depenencies 2.4 Treebanks, created solely using UD 2.4 data (http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-2988). The model documentation including performance can be found at http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/udpipe/models#universal_dependencies_24_models .
To use these models, you need UDPipe binary version at least 1.2, which you can download from http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/udpipe .
In addition to models itself, all additional data and value of hyperparameters used for training are available in the second archive, allowing reproducible training.
Tokenizer, POS Tagger, Lemmatizer and Parser models for 94 treebanks of 61 languages of Universal Depenencies 2.5 Treebanks, created solely using UD 2.5 data (http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-3105). The model documentation including performance can be found at http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/udpipe/models#universal_dependencies_25_models .
To use these models, you need UDPipe binary version at least 1.2, which you can download from http://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/udpipe .
In addition to models itself, all additional data and value of hyperparameters used for training are available in the second archive, allowing reproducible training.
Czech translation of WordSim353. The Czech translation of English WordSim353 word pairs were obtained from four translators. All translation variants were scored according to the lexical similarity/relatedness annotation instructions for WordSim353 annotators, by 25 Czech annotators. The resulting data set consists of two annotation files: "WordSim353-cs.csv" and "WordSim-cs-Multi.csv". Both files are encoded in UTF-8, have a header, text is enclosed in double quotes, and columns are separated by commas. The rows are numbered. The WordSim-cs-Multi data set has rows numbered from 1 to 634, whereas the row indices in the WordSim353-cs data set reflect the corresponding row numbers in the WordSim-cs-Multi data set.
The WordSim353-cs file contains a one-to-one mapping selection of 353 Czech equivalent pairs whose judgments have proven to be most similar to the judgments of their corresponding English originals (compared by the absolute value of the difference between the means over all annotators in each language counterpart). In one case ("psychology-cognition"), two Czech equivalent pairs had identical means as well as confidence intervals, so we randomly selected one.
The "WordSim-cs-Multi.csv" file contains human judgments for all translation variants.
In both data sets, we preserved all 25 individual scores. In the WordSim353-cs data set, we added a column with their Czech means as well as a column containing the original English means and 95% confidence intervals in separate columns for each mean (computed by the CI function in the Rmisc R package). The WordSim-cs-Multi data set contains only the Czech means and confidence intervals. For the most convenient lexical search, we provided separate columns with the respective Czech and English single words, entire word pairs, and eventually an English-Czech quadruple in both data sets.
The data set also contains an xls table with the four translations and a preliminary selection of the best variants performed by an adjudicator.