Search

Start Over Format print Subject estetika Type model:article

1. Fyzický vzhled jako mechanismus sociální stratifikace: Berry, B. The power of looks. Social stratification of physical appearance

Creator:
Jaroslava Hasmanová Marhánková
Format:
print, bez média, and svazek
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
fyzický vzhled člověka, sociální stratifikace, estetika, body image, social stratification, aesthetics, physical-appearance-based bias, 18, and 316.3
Language:
Czech
Description:
[autor recenze] Jaroslava Hasmanová Marhánková.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public

2. Jan Chlíbec - Tomáš Černušák, Savonarola a Florencie. Jeho působení a estetické názory

Creator:
Pavlína Cermanová
Format:
print
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
Savonarola, Girolamo, 1452-1498, 15. století, křesťanská teologie, křesťanští reformátoři, estetika, biografie, Christian theology, Christian reformers, aesthetics, biography, Florencie (Itálie), 5, and 27
Language:
Czech
Description:
[autor recenze] Pavlína Cermanová.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public

3. Neznámý zápis z Meißnerových přednášek z estetiky a rétoriky: (Pokus o dataci a charakteristiku vídeňského rukopisu)

Creator:
Hlobil, Tomáš
Format:
print, text, regular print, bez média, and svazek
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
Meißner, August Gottlieb, 1753-1807, estetika, romantismus, aesthetics, romanticism, 8, and 94(437)
Language:
Czech and English
Description:
This essay aims to describe hitherto unknown notes of aesthetics lectures given by August Gottlieb Meißner (1753-1807) at Prague University. It compares these notes (made by a certain Wagner, and deposited in the Wienbibliothek im Rathaus) with notes deposited in Czech libraries, and seeks to determine their place chronologically amongst notes made by others attending Meißner’s lectures over the years. The most important difference in content between the earlier known notes and Wagner’s is Meißner’s negative attitude towards the Schlegel brothers. This attitude slightly alters our existing notion of his views on the relationship between literature and morality. Taken alone, the collections of notes in Czech libraries had led one to conclude that this Prague ordinarius was an ardent libertine, who dared, even at a conservative Austrian university, to push for the autonomy of art, including a thorough split between art and morality, regarding not only works of art, but also, to a certain extent, the artists themselves. By contrast, the Vienna MS as a matter of priority restricts this split to art, and limits it to the higher, moral aims of the artist as citizen. His approach to questions of morality and to the Schlegel brothers demonstrates that while Meißner considered himself part of the liberally enlightened current of contemporaneous literature, which made moving the emotions the central aim of art, he was no longer an adherent of up­and­coming Romanticism with its extreme conviction about unlimited authorial liberty, which stemmed from the philosophical Idealism of the times. This attitude to the Schlegel brothers also suggests that Wagner attended Meißner’s lectures in aesthetics and rhetoric in the winter of 1800/1., Tomáš Hlobil., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public

4. Pražské univerzitní přednášky z estetiky Johann Heinricha Dambecka: (Hledání jejich autentické podoby)

Creator:
Tomáš Hlobil
Format:
print, bez média, and svazek
Type:
article, studie, studies, model:article, and TEXT
Subject:
Dambeck, Johann Heinrich Mathias, 1774-1820, Karlo-Ferdinandova universita, 1780-1820, estetici, estetika, muzikologie, vysokoškolští učitelé, aesthetics, aesthetists, college teachers, musicology, Praha (Česko), Prague (Czechia), 78.01, 111.852, 378.011.3-051, 111.852-051, and (048.8)
Language:
Czech
Description:
Studie Tomáše Hlobila se zabývá náplní přednášek estetika Johanna Heinricha Dambecka, které Dambeck přednášel během svého pedagogického působení na pražské univerzitě., This article examines contemporaneous reports about two versions of lectures in aesthetics, which were given at Prague University by Johann Heinrich Dambeck (1774–1820). They were recorded by the publisher Joseph Adolf Hanslik (1785–1859) in a manuscript summary in 1819 and a two-volume book published in 1822 and 1823. The article presents a comparison of the two sources in order to determine which parts of the commentary originate with Dambeck and which with Hanslik. Considering the large scope and the bibliographical nature of the chief part of the appendices to the book, the author of the article concludes that they originated not with Dambeck, but with Hanslik., Tomáš Hlobil., Rubrika: Studie, and Německé resumé na s. 130, anglický abstrakt na s. 123.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ and policy:public

5. Romantika jako epistemologická alternativa otevřená Kantovou Kritikou soudnosti

Creator:
Ďurďovič, Martin
Format:
print, bez média, and svazek
Type:
model:article and TEXT
Subject:
věda, teorie poznání, estetika, teleologie, filozofie umění, science, aesthetics, teleology, philosophy of art, německá romantika, epistemology, German romanticism, 12, and 00
Language:
Czech
Description:
Cílem článku je ukázat, že německá raná romantika, která položila filosofické základy romantického hnutí, nebere příklon k subjektivitě prožívání jako odklon od poznání, nýbrž jako jiný způsob poznání. Romantická niternost nachází svůj protějšek ve zkušenosti světa, jemuž umění dokáže propůjčit hlubší význam než racionální filosofie a věda. Tento nový pohled na poznání je romantiky použit jak na výklad přírody, tak duchovní lidské skutečnosti. Článek upozorňuje na to, že vedle dědictví spinozismu měla romantická epistemologie důležitý zdroj v některých úvahách Kantovy Kritiky soudnosti. Tato vazba je sledována zvláště na příkladu filosofie umění F. W. J. Schellinga. Argumentace článku je rozvinuta v kritické konfrontaci se subjektivistickou interpretací romantiky H.-G. Gadamera, čímž se ozřejmuje její širší epistemologický dosah i aktuálnost. Návaznost německých romantiků na Kantovu Kritiku soudnosti se spíše než tendencí k subjektivizaci estetiky projevovala ve snaze o estetizaci poznání., The aim of the article is to show how German romanticism, which laid the philosophical foundations for the Romantic Movement, understood the shift toward lived subjectivity not as a deviation from knowledge, but as another form of knowledge. Romantic inwardness finds its counterpart in the experience of the world, which is granted deeper meaning by art than it is by rational philosophy or science. This new view of knowledge is applied to both nature and human spiritual reality. The article notes that, besides the legacy of Spinozism, another importance source of romantic epistemology was the thoughts Kant put forth in his Critique of Judgement. This link is traced in particular in the philosophy of art of F. W. J. Schelling. At the same time, the article pursues a line of argument that critically confronts the subjectivistic interpretation of romanticism espoused by H.-G. Gadamer, what unveils the epistemological reach and current relevance of the topic. Th e German romantics’ embrace of Kant’s Critique of Judgement is manifested not so much in a tendency to subjectivize aesthetics as in their attempt to aestheticize the knowledge., and Martin Ďurďovič.
Rights:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ and policy:public