Manual classification of errors of English-Slovak translation according to the classification introduced by Vilar et al. [1]. 50 sentences randomly selected from WMT 2011 test set [2] were translated by 3 MT systems described in [3] and MT errors were manually marked and classified. Reference translation is included.
References:
[1] David Vilar, Jia Xu, Luis Fernando D’Haro and Hermann Ney. Error Analysis of Machine Translation Output. In International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pages 697-702. Genoa, Italy, May 2006.
[2] http://www.statmt.org/wmt11/evaluation-task.html
[3] Petra Galuščáková and Ondřej Bojar. Improving SMT by Using Parallel Data of a Closely Related Language. In Human Language Technologies - The Baltic Perspective - Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference Baltic HLT 2012, volume 247 of Frontiers in AI and Applications, pages 58-65, Amsterdam, Netherlands, October 2012. IOS Press. and This work has been supported by the grant Euro-MatrixPlus (FP7-ICT-2007-3-231720 of the EU and
7E09003 of the Czech Republic)
Manually ranked outputs of Czech-Slovak translations. Three annotators manually ranked outputs of five MT systems (Česílko, Česílko2, Google Translate and two Moses setups) on three data sets (100 sentences randomly selected from books, 100 sentences randomly selected from Acquis corpus and 50 first sentences from WMT 2010 test set). Ranking was applied in MT systems comparison in [1].
References:
[1] Ondřej Bojar, Petra Galuščáková, and Miroslav Týnovský. Evaluating Quality of Machine Translation from Czech to Slovak. In Markéta Lopatková, editor, Information Technologies - Applications and Theory, pages 3-9, September 2011 and This work has been supported by the grant Euro-MatrixPlus (FP7-ICT-2007-3-231720 of the EU and
7E09003 of the Czech Republic)
Data
-----
We have collected English-Odia parallel data for the purposes of NLP
research of the Odia language.
The data for the parallel corpus was extracted from existing parallel
corpora such as OdiEnCorp 1.0 and PMIndia, and books which contain both
English and Odia text such as grammar and bilingual literature books. We
also included parallel text from multiple public websites such as Odia
Wikipedia, Odia digital library, and Odisha Government websites.
The parallel corpus covers many domains: the Bible, other literature,
Wiki data relating to many topics, Government policies, and general
conversation. We have processed the raw data collected from the books,
websites, performed sentence alignments (a mix of manual and automatic
alignments) and released the corpus in a form suitable for various NLP
tasks.
Corpus Format
-------------
OdiEnCorp 2.0 is stored in simple tab-delimited plain text files, each
with three tab-delimited columns:
- a coarse indication of the domain
- the English sentence
- the corresponding Odia sentence
The corpus is shuffled at the level of sentence pairs.
The coarse domains are:
books ... prose text
dict ... dictionaries and phrasebooks
govt ... partially formal text
odiencorp10 ... OdiEnCorp 1.0 (mix of domains)
pmindia ... PMIndia (the original corpus)
wikipedia ... sentences and phrases from Wikipedia
Data Statistics
---------------
The statistics of the current release are given below.
Note that the statistics differ from those reported in the paper due to
deduplication at the level of sentence pairs. The deduplication was
performed within each of the dev set, test set and training set and
taking the coarse domain indication into account. It is still possible
that the same sentence pair appears more than once within the same set
(dev/test/train) if it came from different domains, and it is also
possible that a sentence pair appears in several sets (dev/test/train).
Parallel Corpus Statistics
--------------------------
Dev Dev Dev Test Test Test Train Train Train
Sents # EN # OD Sents # EN # OD Sents # EN # OD
books 3523 42011 36723 3895 52808 45383 3129 40461 35300
dict 3342 14580 13838 3437 14807 14110 5900 21591 20246
govt - - - - - - 761 15227 13132
odiencorp10 947 21905 19509 1259 28473 24350 26963 704114 602005
pmindia 3836 70282 61099 3836 68695 59876 30687 551657 486636
wikipedia 1896 9388 9385 1917 21381 20951 1930 7087 7122
Total 13544 158166 140554 14344 186164 164670 69370 1340137 1164441
"Sents" are the counts of the sentence pairs in the given set (dev/test/train)
and domain (books/dict/...).
"# EN" and "# OD" are approximate counts of words (simply space-delimited,
without tokenization) in English and Odia
The total number of sentence pairs (lines) is 13544+14344+69370=97258. Ignoring
the set and domain and deduplicating again, this number drops to 94857.
Citation
--------
If you use this corpus, please cite the following paper:
@inproceedings{parida2020odiencorp,
title={OdiEnCorp 2.0: Odia-English Parallel Corpus for Machine Translation},
author={Parida, Shantipriya and Dash, Satya Ranjan and Bojar, Ond{\v{r}}ej and Motlicek, Petr and Pattnaik, Priyanka and Mallick, Debasish Kumar},
booktitle={Proceedings of the WILDRE5--5th Workshop on Indian Language Data: Resources and Evaluation},
pages={14--19},
year={2020}
}
The January 2018 release of the ParaCrawl is the first version of the corpus. It contains parallel corpora for 11 languages paired with English, crawled from a large number of web sites. The selection of websites is based on CommonCrawl, but ParaCrawl is extracted from a brand new crawl which has much higher coverage of these selected websites than CommonCrawl. Since the data is fairly raw, it is released with two quality metrics that can be used for corpus filtering. An official "clean" version of each corpus uses one of the metrics. For more details and raw data download please visit: http://paracrawl.eu/releases.html
The dataset used for the Ptakopět experiment on outbound machine translation. It consists of screenshots of web forms with user queries entered. The queries are available also in a text form. The dataset comprises two language versions: English and Czech. Whereas the English version has been fully post-processed (screenshots cropped, queries within the screenshots highlighted, dataset split based on its quality etc.), the Czech version is raw as it was collected by the annotators.
Post-editing and MQM annotations produced by the QT21 project. As described in
@InProceedings{specia-etal_MTSummit:2017,
author = {Specia, Lucia and Kim Harris and Frédéric Blain and Aljoscha Burchardt and Viviven Macketanz and Inguna Skadiņa and Matteo Negri and and Marco Turchi},
title = {Translation Quality and Productivity: A Study on Rich Morphology Languages},
booktitle = {Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit XVI},
year = {2017},
pages = {55--71},
address = {Nagoya, Japan},
}
Test data for the WMT 2017 Automatic post-editing task (the same used for the Sentence-level Quality Estimation task). They consist in German-English triplets (source and target) belonging to the pharmacological domain and already tokenized. Test set contains 2,000 pairs. All data is provided by the EU project QT21 (http://www.qt21.eu/).
Test data for the WMT 2017 Automatic post-editing task (the same used for the Sentence-level Quality Estimation task). They consist in 2,000 English-German pairs (source and target) belonging to the IT domain and already tokenized. All data is provided by the EU project QT21 (http://www.qt21.eu/).
Test data for the WMT 2018 Automatic post-editing task. They consist in English-German pairs (source and target) belonging to the information technology domain and already tokenized. Test set contains 1,023 pairs. A neural machine translation system has been used to generate the target segments. All data is provided by the EU project QT21 (http://www.qt21.eu/).