On the basis of rich material from Asia, a recently described group of dandelions, Taraxacum sect. Stenoloba Kirschner et Štěpánek, is revised taxonomically. Four previously described species are recognized: T. sinomongolicum, newly typified, T. mongoliforme, with a lectotype replacing the original holotype now not extant, and a new epitype, T. scariosum, a new combination of Leontodon scariosus Tausch, replacing the frequently confused names, T. asiaticum, newly typified, and T. stenolobum, and T. multisectum, a taxon for the first time compared with other members of the section. Three new species are described: T. abax occupies a large range from S Siberia and Mongolia to NE China, T. abalienatum and T. odibile are known from Mongolia and SE Siberia. Taraxacum abax and T. abalienatum represent core species of the section Stenoloba, whilst T. odibile exhibits a mixture of characters of sections Stenoloba and Leucantha. All the known members of the section Stenoloba are agamosperms. Taraxacum mongoliforme, T. abax and T. scariosum proved to be triploid with 2n = 24. This account includes detailed descriptions and an identification key.
This paper presents an overview of the latest information about the beginnings of the technology of pottery making in the area of the forest-steppe belt in Siberia and the Russian part of Eastern Europe all the way to the Ural Mountains. From a continental point of view, a brief spatiotemporal diagram presents a completely different background of the beginnings of pottery in our lands and also in corresponding parts of Southeast Europe, where the origin of pottery has traditionally been linked to the Neolithisation of Europe. The earliest pottery technology in China dates back to 20 000 BP, followed by all the subsequent data from the Far East area to Lake Baikal. The earliest pottery culture, Jomon, which had been developing in Japan for more than ten thousand years, is not included here. In the Russian part of Eastern Europe, pottery technology starts developing only after 8 000 BP. Typologically uniform and mostly unchangeable development of beaker-shaped pottery, mostly with a pointed bottom, is common for both these areas. This development continues in Scandinavia and adjacent areas of the Baltic and in Atlantic Europe. In the central parts of Europe, similar shapes only occur sporadically in the earliest period. However, the earliest Eurasian pottery had influenced the development of later prehistoric periods. Numerous settlement groups on the Eurasian continents were characterised by two traditions that are archaeologically recognisable. In simple terms, one of the traditions was agricultural, the other conservative. and Práce předkládá přehled nejnovějších informací o počátcích technologie výroby keramiky v oblastech lesostepního pásma Sibiře a ruské východní Evropy až k Uralu. Data nejstarší keramické technologie v Číně přesahují číslo 20 tis. BC. Na území ruské východní Evropy začíná vývoj keramické technologie většinou až po roce 8000 BC. Obě oblasti spojuje typologicky jednotný a málo proměnlivý vývoj kotlovitých tvarů převážně se špičatým dnem. Na tento vývoj navazuje srovnatelně kulturní posloupnost ve Skandinávii a v přilehlých oblastech Baltu i Evropského pobřeží Atlantiku. V centrálních oblastech Evropy se podobné tvary vyskytnou v nejstarším období zcela ojediněle. Eurasijská nejstarší keramika však nepochybně ovlivnila vývoj i v pozdějších pravěkých obdobích. Početné skupiny osídlení na evropském i eurasijském kontinentu se vyznačovaly dvojí tradicí hmatatelnou archeologicky nejen v keramice. Zjednodušeně řečeno, jedna byla zemědělská, druhá konzervativní.
in summer 2009, we documented active summer campsites at lakes and abandoned winter and spring campsites in open tundra (mountain ridge of Yangana Pe) and forest tundra (Oktyaberskaya, north of Labytnangi). Discussion of the floristic and zoological potentials of tundra, forest tundra, and forest for nutriture shows that plant resources and fish are available predominantly in summer while reindeer occur in these regions during fall, winter and spring, as they return from summer pastures further to the north. Movements of the individual Nenets families depend on ownership of sufficient reindeer. Missing components of the nutriture are substituted by purchasing consumer products. The documented camps are structured along discrete zones such as interior living areas (including children´s playgrounds), exterior areas with evidence of woodworking, processing reindeer, and other activities, peripheral toss zones, and dispersed activity remains in the surrounding landscape (some of which may have ritual meaning). Certain variation recorded in the individual camps is caused by distances between camps, to the nearest shop and to communication networks, by demographic structure of the site, by activities of the inhabitants and their financial potential (after selling some of the reindeer in winter, for example). The scope of these comparisons is enriched by Upper Paleolithic evidence from central European hunters’ settlements which display a basically similar camp structure and zonality but include (of course) different types of objects and activities., Jiří Svoboda ... [et al.]., and Obsahuje seznam literatury
Archaeological excavations conducted at the settlement-sanctuary of Ust-Polui, located just north of the Arctic Circle in Western Siberia yielded the oldest remains of early iron production in the Circumpolar region of Asia. Ust-Polui archaeological finds associated with metallurgy of iron are dated back to the 3rd century BC – 2nd century AD. Hence the finds date the origins of metallurgical technologies used in the north of Western Siberia virtually several centuries back in time and geographically extend the spread of iron metallurgy between the eras significantly. It seems that Ust-Polui is the most northern point on the Earth where iron metallurgy was developed by ancient people. The discovery of new iron production site poses an important question – what are the reasons and ways of appearance of the iron smelting technologies in the Polar North of Siberia? It is possible that all knowledge was obtained from outside via contacts with metal producing societies, who lived in the eastern regions of the Ural Mountains (to the southwest of Ust-Polui), and knew how to produce iron about two thousand years ago. and Archeologické výzkumy osady-svatyně Ust-Polui, nacházející se severně od arktického kruhu v západní Sibiři, odkryly nejstarší pozůstatky rané výroby železa v polárních oblastech Asie. Archeologické nálezy spojené s metalurgií železa jsou datovány od 3. stol. př. n. l. do 2. stol. n. l. Datují tak počátky užívání metalurgických technologií v severozápadní Sibiři prakticky o několik století dříve a geograficky výrazně rozšiřují prostor, v němž se železná metalurgie mezi danými obdobími šířila. Zdá se, že Ust-Polui je nejsevernějším bodem planety, kde byla starověká metalurgie železa rozvinuta. S objevem nové lokality s doklady metalurgie železa vyvstává důležitá otázka – z jakých důvodů a jakým způsobem se metalurgie železa za polárním kruhem na severu Sibiře objevila? Je možné, že veškeré poznání bylo získáno zvenčí prostřednictvím kontaktů se společnostmi vyrábějícími kovy, které žily ve východních oblastech Uralských hor (na jihozápad od Ust-Polui) a které si osvojily znalost výroby železa již před dvěma tisíci lety.