Plný text obsahuje 56 anglických abstraktů. (Jsou uvedeny v rámci Summary na str. 200-221.) and Výčet dalších autorů hesel/textů, kteří nemohli být z kapacitního hlediska uvedeni do položky Údaje o autorech:
Hoperniak, Vladimír (Sušice);
Kudelová, Mária (Šumperk);
Hutníková, Jana (Tachov);
Kabelíková, Božena (Třebíč);
Jakouběová, Vladimíra (Turnov);
Tarcalová, Ludmila (Uherské Hradiště);
Odehnal, Petr (Valašské Klobouky);
Sojková, Jana (Vrchabí);
Mikysková, Markéta (Vyškov);
Pavlištík, Karel, Prudká, Alena a Petráková, Blanka (Zlín);
Poláková, Květoslava (Znojmo);
Jelínková, Jaroslava (Železný Brod).
Překlad abstraktů do angličtiny:
Štěpán, Pavel (št) a Válka, Lukáš (lv).
The article defends the possibility of using evolutionary schemes in historical sciences, as models for interpreting cultural-historical changes. It points out the possibilities for maintaining certain space within master narratives for explaining the theories of partial developmental processes. The demographic data could, then, be used as hypothetical indicators of the processes of cultural-historical change., Jan Horský., and Obsahuje bibliografii
The article lays out Jonathan Israel’s central ideas on the European Enlightenment, as they have been developed in his Radical Enlightenment (2001), Enlightenment Contested (2006) and A Revolution of the Mind (2009). I explain his ‘controversialist method’ of intellectual history and point out the advantages and faults of this approach. Israel’s model of the heterogeneous Enlightenment is shown as a response to A. MacIntyre’s postmodern criticism, and to the older models of a ‘single Enlightenment’, as presented by P. Gay, or older models of multiple enlightenments, as presented by J. G. Pocock. However, Israel’s heterogeneous Enlightenment recognizes just one progenitor of the positive ‘modern values’, which is identified with the Radical wing. The article reviews Israel’ s narrative of the development and spread of the Radical Enlightenment in Europe and the struggles with the Enlightenment mainstream and within the Enlightenment mainstream. However, I also show some faults in Israel’s argument, mainly his view of the ‘secular morality’, which should have been the outcome of the Radical Enlightenment’s campaign. In conclusion, I point at the inconsistency of Israel’s reconstruction of the Enlightenment morals and the differences between his view and J. Schneewind’s interpretation., Ivo Cerman., and Obsahuje bibliografické odkazy
In the past couple of decades the social sciences have paid much
attention to the topic of boundaries and boundary regions. The present article analyses the changes in the discursive assessment of the Czech-Saxon boundary after 1989. It focuses on the transformation of the national and transnational culture and politics of history related to boundaries, cross-border regions and
cross-border interactions. The interplay of the socio-political transition with its discursive implications and the application of new methods and concepts in social sciences (boundary and identity studies, spatial turn etc.) created conditions for a significant
modification of the approach to boundaries and boundary regions. Concentrating on the public and academic discourse, the article assesses the conceptualization and representation of the
Czech-Saxon boundary in political and public rhetoric, historiography and museology. and Článek zahrnuje poznámkový aparát pod čarou